3.3 Valuation Approaches (Sales Comparison, Cost, Income) and BPOs
Key Takeaways
- The sales comparison approach adjusts comparables to the subject; adjust the comp, never the subject, and subtract for superior comp features.
- The cost approach equals reproduction or replacement cost minus depreciation plus land value, and is best for new or special-purpose properties.
- Depreciation has three forms: physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and external (economic) obsolescence.
- The income approach uses capitalization: Value = Net Operating Income / Capitalization Rate; the GRM is a quick screening tool for residential rentals.
- A BPO is an agent's price opinion for listing or lending, narrower and cheaper than a formal appraisal.
The Three Approaches to Value
Appraisers use up to three approaches, each rooted in the principle of substitution. The most appropriate approach depends on the property type:
- Sales comparison - best for homes and land (active markets with comps).
- Cost - best for new, unique, or special-purpose buildings (schools, churches).
- Income - best for income-producing property (apartments, offices, retail).
Sales Comparison Approach (SCA)
The SCA values the subject by comparing recently sold, similar properties (comparables or comps) and adjusting for differences. The golden rule: adjust the comparable, not the subject.
- If the comp is superior (e.g., it has an extra bathroom the subject lacks), subtract from the comp's price.
- If the comp is inferior, add to the comp's price.
Worked example - subject sold price unknown:
| Feature | Comp A sold price | Adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| Base sale price | $400,000 | - |
| Comp has extra garage bay (superior) | -$8,000 | |
| Subject has updated kitchen (comp inferior) | +$10,000 | |
| Comp has larger lot (superior) | -$5,000 | |
| Adjusted indicated value | $397,000 |
We start at $400,000, subtract $8,000 and $5,000 for the comp's superior features, and add $10,000 because the comp is inferior on the kitchen, indicating $397,000 for the subject.
Reconciliation and the right approach for the property
After completing the applicable approaches, the appraiser reconciles — weighting the most reliable approach for the assignment, never averaging. The weighting follows the property type:
| Property | Most reliable approach | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Typical single-family home | Sales comparison | Active market, many comps |
| New or special-purpose (school, church, library) | Cost | Few/no comparable sales |
| Apartment, office, retail | Income | Buyers pay for the income stream |
| Vacant residential land | Sales comparison | Comps of similar lots |
Effective age, economic life, and the age-life method
Depreciation in the cost approach is often estimated by the age-life (straight-line) method: accrued depreciation = (effective age / total economic life) x reproduction or replacement cost of improvements. A building with an effective age of 12 years (how old it acts, after renovations) and a total economic life of 60 years has depreciated 12/60 = 20%. On $300,000 of improvement cost, that is $60,000 of depreciation, leaving $240,000 before land is added back at full value.
Note effective age can be lower than actual age when a building is well maintained or renovated, or higher when it is neglected — a frequent exam distinction.
A comparable sold for $350,000. It has a finished basement the subject lacks, worth $15,000, and the subject has a deck the comp lacks, worth $6,000. What is the adjusted value indication for the subject?
Cost Approach
The cost approach reasons that a buyer would pay no more than the cost to build an equivalent. The formula is:
Value = (Reproduction or Replacement Cost - Depreciation) + Land Value
- Reproduction cost rebuilds an exact replica (same materials).
- Replacement cost rebuilds equivalent utility with modern materials and is more commonly used.
Worked example:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Replacement cost of improvements | $320,000 |
| Less: accrued depreciation | -$48,000 |
| Depreciated improvement value | $272,000 |
| Plus: land value (always added at full value, land does not depreciate) | +$90,000 |
| Indicated value | $362,000 |
The cost approach shines for new construction and special-purpose properties where comps are scarce. A trap: land is never depreciated - depreciation applies only to improvements.
The Three Types of Depreciation
Depreciation in appraisal means loss in value from any cause. There are three categories:
| Type | Cause | Curable? | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical deterioration | Wear, tear, age | Often curable | Worn roof, peeling paint |
| Functional obsolescence | Outdated design or features | Sometimes curable | One-car garage, no central air, bedroom only reachable through another |
| External (economic) obsolescence | Factors outside the property | Incurable | New landfill nearby, declining neighborhood, high interest rates |
The key distinction: external obsolescence comes from outside the property line and is always considered incurable because the owner cannot fix it.
Income Approach
For income-producing property, value derives from the income it generates. The core formula uses direct capitalization:
Value = Net Operating Income (NOI) / Capitalization Rate
NOI is effective gross income minus operating expenses (it excludes debt service and depreciation). Worked example:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Effective gross income | $96,000 |
| Less: operating expenses | -$36,000 |
| Net operating income (NOI) | $60,000 |
| Capitalization rate | 8% (0.08) |
| Value = $60,000 / 0.08 | $750,000 |
Note the inverse relationship: a higher cap rate yields a lower value (more risk demanded), and a lower cap rate yields a higher value. If the cap rate rose to 10%, value would fall to $600,000.
Gross Rent Multiplier (GRM)
For small residential rentals, appraisers use a quick screening tool, the gross rent multiplier:
GRM = Sale Price / Gross Monthly Rent
If comparable rentals sell at a GRM of 150 and the subject rents for $2,000/month, the estimated value is 150 x $2,000 = $300,000. The GRM uses gross rent (not net), ignores expenses, and is a rough indicator only - never a substitute for full capitalization. A variant, the gross income multiplier (GIM), uses annual income.
Broker Price Opinions and CMAs
A broker price opinion (BPO) is a licensed agent's or broker's estimate of likely sale price, often ordered by lenders for short sales, foreclosures, or portfolio reviews. A comparative market analysis (CMA) is similar but typically prepared to help a seller set a list price.
Both rely mainly on comparable sales but are not appraisals: they are faster, cheaper, performed by licensees rather than appraisers, and may not be used in place of an appraisal for a federally related transaction. Many states bar agents from calling a BPO an 'appraisal' or charging appraisal-style fees for one.
An apartment building has a net operating income of $84,000. Investors in the market expect a 7% capitalization rate. Using direct capitalization, the indicated value is: