5.2 Emphasis, Other Matter, and Going Concern

Key Takeaways

  • Emphasis-of-matter paragraphs highlight a matter that is appropriately presented or disclosed in the financial statements and is fundamental to users' understanding.
  • Other-matter paragraphs address a matter not presented in the statements that is relevant to the audit, the auditor's responsibilities, or the report.
  • Neither paragraph modifies the opinion; they add emphasis or context only.
  • Substantial doubt about going concern is assessed for one year beyond the financial statement issuance date under AU-C 570, after evaluating management's plans.
  • If going-concern doubt remains but disclosure is adequate, a nonissuer auditor issues an unmodified opinion with a separate going-concern section.
Last updated: June 2026

Report Language That Does Not Modify the Opinion

The 2026 AUD Blueprint explicitly tests the appropriate use of emphasis-of-matter and other-matter paragraphs (under AU-C 706 for nonissuers). These are high-yield precisely because they look like modifications but are not. They add information or draw attention; they never change the auditor's conclusion. If the underlying matter is mishandled, the problem migrates back to the Section 5.1 opinion grid.

Emphasis vs. Other Matter

Paragraph typePoints toRequired vs. discretionaryCommon CPA examples
Emphasis-of-matterA matter presented or disclosed in the financial statementsMay be required or discretionaryGoing-concern uncertainty, major subsequent event, significant related-party transaction, special-purpose framework, justified change in accounting principle
Other-matterA matter not presented in the statementsMay be required or discretionaryPrior-period statements audited by a predecessor, supplementary information responsibilities, restricted-use alert, required supplementary information

An emphasis-of-matter paragraph is used when a matter is so important it is fundamental to users' understanding. The auditor references the related note. The matter must be appropriately disclosed; if disclosure is omitted or materially wrong, the issue becomes a GAAP departure and the opinion may be qualified or adverse. An other-matter paragraph gives context about the audit, the auditor's responsibilities, or the report itself, and never points to a matter inside the statements.

On the exam, deciding which paragraph applies is frequently the entire question, so always ask first: is this matter inside the financial statements or outside them?

Going Concern Decision Path

Under AU-C 570, going concern begins as an evidence-and-disclosure issue, not an automatic modification. The auditor evaluates whether conditions and events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time (one year beyond the date the financial statements are issued, or available to be issued).

Red-flag conditions include recurring operating losses, working-capital deficiencies, negative operating cash flows, loan-covenant defaults, denial of usual trade credit, restructuring of debt, loss of a key customer or franchise, or an uninsured catastrophe.

Next, evaluate management's plans. Plans are more persuasive when specific, feasible, and within management's control. A signed financing commitment, an executed asset-sale agreement, or a binding owner-support letter outweighs a vague intention to seek capital.

Reporting Outcomes

  1. No substantial doubt after considering plans: issue the normal report.
  2. Doubt remains, disclosure adequate: nonissuer auditor issues an unmodified opinion plus a separate Substantial Doubt About the Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern section.
  3. Doubt remains, disclosure inadequate: this is a GAAP departure - qualified or adverse depending on pervasiveness.
  4. Evidence about going concern cannot be obtained: treat as a scope limitation - qualified or disclaimer.

For issuers, PCAOB standards (AS 2415) use an explanatory paragraph rather than the nonissuer "separate section" label, and the going-concern look-forward period is tied to one year from the financial statement date. CPA questions usually make the entity type explicit when the form differs.

Consistency and Comparability

A justified change in accounting principle that is properly accounted for and disclosed does not modify the opinion, but it does require an emphasis-of-matter paragraph referring to the change. By contrast, an unjustified change, or one accounted for incorrectly, is a GAAP departure affecting the opinion. Do not confuse consistency (same principles period to period) with comparability (presentation across periods).

Traps to Avoid

  • Do not use an emphasis paragraph to fix bad disclosure - inadequate disclosure modifies the opinion.
  • Do not modify the opinion solely because substantial doubt exists if disclosure is adequate.
  • Do not classify a matter as other-matter without first confirming it is not in the statements.
  • A going-concern paragraph is never a substitute for the auditor's responsibility to evaluate management's disclosures.

Worked Example: Same Doubt, Four Reports

A manufacturer has negative working capital, a defaulted loan covenant, and recurring losses. Substantial doubt clearly exists. Trace the four possible outcomes:

  1. Management secures a signed refinancing and waiver from the bank before the report date; the auditor concludes the plans alleviate the doubt. Unmodified, no special section.
  2. Doubt is not alleviated, but the note fully describes the conditions, plans, and the going-concern uncertainty. Unmodified with a separate going-concern section.
  3. Doubt is not alleviated, and management refuses to disclose the uncertainty. This is a GAAP departure (inadequate disclosure) - qualified or adverse by pervasiveness.
  4. The auditor cannot obtain evidence about the feasibility of the rescue plan. This is a scope limitation - qualified or disclaimer.

Notice the doubt is identical in all four; only the disclosure quality and evidence availability move the report.

Required Communications With Governance

When substantial doubt is identified, the auditor communicates to those charged with governance: whether the conditions raise substantial doubt, the auditor's evaluation of management's plans, the adequacy of disclosure, and the implications for the auditor's report. This communication is required even when disclosure is adequate and the opinion stays unmodified.

Other Information and the Report

Under AU-C 720, the auditor reads other information in documents containing the audited statements (for example, an annual report's management discussion). If there is a material inconsistency or a material misstatement of fact in the other information that management refuses to correct, the auditor describes it in a separate Other Information section. This does not modify the opinion on the financial statements, but it alerts users - a frequent exam contrast with emphasis and other-matter paragraphs.

Quick Reference Checklist

  • Is the matter inside the financial statements? If yes, candidate for emphasis-of-matter; if no, candidate for other-matter.
  • Is the relevant disclosure adequate? If no, the opinion is modified, not emphasized.
  • For going concern, is doubt alleviated by feasible plans within management's control?
  • For a change in principle, is it justified and properly applied? If yes, emphasize; if no, modify.
Test Your Knowledge

A nonissuer has substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's note adequately describes the conditions, the plans, and the uncertainty, and the auditor agrees the disclosure is adequate. What is the most likely report effect?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Which situation most likely calls for an other-matter paragraph rather than an emphasis-of-matter paragraph in a nonissuer audit report?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

A nonissuer voluntarily and justifiably changes from FIFO to weighted-average inventory costing, accounts for it correctly, and fully discloses the change. How should the auditor report?

A
B
C
D