8.1 Innovation: Types, Essentials and Leading Innovation
Key Takeaways
Innovation is the introduction of something new that creates value; an invention that never reaches customers or operations is not yet an innovation.
Doblin's ten types of innovation are grouped into configuration, offering and experience innovations.
McKinsey's eight essentials of innovation are aspire, choose, discover, evolve, accelerate, scale, extend and mobilise.
Early-stage innovation is better funded in stages against learning milestones than judged by a single traditional ROI test.
Leaders of innovation balance paradoxes such as support versus confrontation and patience versus urgency.
8.1 Innovation: Types, Essentials and Leading Innovation
Executive Summary: Module 4 turns analysis into options for growth, and innovation is the engine behind most of them. This section defines innovation, classifies its types (including Doblin's ten types), summarises McKinsey's eight essentials of an innovative organisation, explains why early-stage innovation cannot be judged by traditional return-on-investment tests alone, and sets out the paradoxes leaders must manage to make innovation happen.
What Counts as Innovation?
Innovation is the introduction of something new—a product, service, process or business model—that creates value, either by increasing what customers will pay for or by improving efficiency, cost or market position. An invention that never reaches customers or operations is not yet an innovation. For organisations seeking above-industry growth, innovation is one of the most reliable sources of competitive advantage, because it creates positions that rivals have not yet matched.
Degrees and kinds of innovation
- Incremental innovation improves what already exists (a faster model, a lower-cost process); radical innovation creates something substantially new.
- Sustaining innovation improves performance for existing customers; disruptive innovation starts with simpler, cheaper offerings that existing leaders overlook (Section 13.2).
- Joe Tidd and John Bessant's 4Ps classify innovation by target: product (what is offered), process (how it is made or delivered), position (the context or market in which it is introduced) and paradigm (the underlying business model).
Doblin's Ten Types of Innovation
The Doblin framework (Larry Keeley and colleagues) shows that innovation can occur anywhere in a business, not only in the product. Its ten types fall into three groups:
| Group | Type | Question it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration (inner workings) | Profit model | How do we make money? |
| Network | How do we connect with others to create value? | |
| Structure | How do we organise and align talent and assets? | |
| Process | What signature methods do we use to do our work? | |
| Offering (core product or service) | Product performance | What distinguishing features and functions do we offer? |
| Product system | What complementary products and services link together? | |
| Experience (customer-facing) | Service | How do we support the value of our offerings? |
| Channel | How do we deliver offerings to customers? | |
| Brand | How do we represent our offerings and business? | |
| Customer engagement | How do we foster compelling interactions? |
Doblin's research found that innovations combining several types are harder to copy than a single product feature. A fast-fashion retailer, for example, may combine process innovation (very short design-to-shelf cycles), network innovation (tightly coordinated suppliers) and channel innovation (seamless online and store experience).
The Eight Essentials of Innovation
McKinsey's study of innovative companies (2015) identified eight essentials. The first four are strategic and creative; the last four are organisational:
- Aspire: leaders treat innovation as essential and set measurable targets for it.
- Choose: the organisation invests in a balanced portfolio of initiatives, allocating time, money and people according to risk.
- Discover: it generates differentiated insights about customers, technology and business models.
- Evolve: it is willing to change its business model, not just its products.
- Accelerate: it moves ideas from concept to launch quickly, cutting bureaucracy.
- Scale: it launches at the right magnitude, with the capacity to meet demand.
- Extend: it uses external networks—partners, suppliers, universities, customers.
- Mobilise: it motivates and rewards people to take the risks innovation requires.
Judging Innovation Financially
Traditional return-on-investment and payback tests assume predictable cash flows, known markets and stable costs. Early-stage innovation has none of these, so forcing it through standard capital budgeting usually makes it look unattractive and starves it of funds. Finance professionals can help by:
- funding innovation in stages, releasing money as milestones are met (a real-options approach);
- managing a portfolio across core improvements, adjacent extensions and transformational bets rather than judging each project in isolation;
- tracking learning milestones (customer evidence, prototype results) before financial returns are expected;
- asking hard questions: How will this affect our financial position? Have hidden implementation costs been included? Can we fund the period before the innovation becomes profitable? How will we measure success?
Leading Innovation: Managing Paradoxes
Innovation is a collective activity, and leaders must design a culture and structure that supports it. Research by Linda Hill and colleagues (Collective Genius) describes six paradoxes that leaders of innovation must balance rather than resolve:
| Paradox | The tension |
|---|---|
| Individual vs collective identity | Creative individuals must also commit to the team |
| Support vs confrontation | People need safety to share ideas, and rigorous challenge to test them |
| Learning vs performance | Experimentation takes time, while short-term targets still matter |
| Improvisation vs structure | Teams must adapt freely, yet commercialisation needs disciplined process |
| Patience vs urgency | Some work (such as safety testing) cannot be rushed, while competitors keep moving |
| Bottom-up vs top-down | Ideas often come from the front line, but leaders must allocate resources and set direction |
Companies known for innovation, such as 3M, combine stretch targets with a collaborative culture that treats failure as information, encourages people to challenge assumptions and brings diverse perspectives into decisions.
Applying the Frameworks to a Case
When a case asks you to evaluate an organisation's innovation, work through three steps:
- Classify what the organisation is doing using the ten types. Many firms innovate only in product performance, which is the easiest type for rivals to copy.
- Diagnose capability against the eight essentials. For example, an organisation may generate good ideas (discover) but fail to fund them consistently (choose) or launch too slowly (accelerate).
- Recommend changes to leadership and resourcing: a portfolio with staged funding, cross-functional teams, partnerships to extend capability, and incentives that reward sensible risk-taking.
This links innovation to the strategic options generated later in the module: the Ansoff growth vectors (Section 6.1), new product and service development (Sections 8.2 and 8.3) and the approaches in Section 8.4.
A logistics company rebuilds its warehouse routing system so that delivery times halve, while the products it delivers and its customer interface stay the same. Under Doblin's ten types, which category does this innovation belong to?
Experience, because delivery speed is part of customer engagement
It is not an innovation, because the product is unchanged
Offering, because customers receive their goods faster
Configuration, specifically a process innovation in how the work is done
A start-up launches a popular app, but its servers crash on launch day because demand far exceeds capacity. Which of McKinsey's eight essentials of innovation did it neglect?
Scale
Extend
Discover
Aspire
A pharmaceutical company refuses to shorten clinical safety testing, but drives its regulatory, manufacturing and marketing teams to be ready on the day approval arrives. Which paradox of leading innovation does this illustrate?
Individual versus collective identity
Bottom-up versus top-down
Patience versus urgency
Improvisation versus structure
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.