1.4 Federalism: Constitutional Division of Powers and Intergovernmental Relations

Federalism: Constitutional Division of Powers and Intergovernmental Relations

Federalism is a structural system of governance in which constitutional sovereignty is divided between a central national authority and constituent political units (the states). In the American system, neither level of government derives its existence or ultimate authority from the other; instead, both the federal government and state governments draw their authority directly from the United States Constitution.

---

1. Comparing Systems of Government

To appreciate the innovation of American federalism, it must be contrasted with the other two major structural arrangements of state power:

• Unitary System: All sovereign authority resides in a single, centralized national government. Subnational administrative units (such as provinces, departments, or counties) exist solely at the pleasure of the central government and exercise only powers delegated to them (e.g., the United Kingdom, France, Japan).
• Confederal System (Confederation): An alliance of sovereign, independent states that delegates strictly limited and enumerated powers to a weak central governing body. The central body cannot act directly upon individual citizens without state consent (e.g., the Articles of Confederation, the Confederate States of America, the European Union).
• Federal System: Power is constitutionally divided and shared between a central national government and subnational states, each possessing protected spheres of autonomy (e.g., the United States, Canada, Germany, Australia).

---

2. The Constitutional Architecture of Powers

The Constitution categorizes governmental authority into distinct classes of powers:

A. Enumerated (Expressed) Powers

Explicitly written down and granted to the national government in the text of the Constitution. Most are concentrated in Article I, Section 8, comprising 27 specific congressional powers, including:

• Laying and collecting taxes, duties, and excises.
• Coining and regulating the value of money.
• Regulating commerce with foreign nations and among the several states (Interstate Commerce Clause).
• Declaring war, raising and supporting armies, and providing a navy.
• Establishing uniform rules of naturalization and laws on bankruptcies.

B. Implied Powers

Powers not explicitly listed in the constitutional text, but reasonably deduced as necessary to carry out the enumerated powers. Their constitutional foundation rests in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18—the Necessary and Proper Clause (often called the Elastic Clause):

• "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States..."
• Examples: Establishing a national banking system (to support taxing and borrowing), creating the Air Force (under the power to raise military forces), enacting federal minimum wage and labor safety laws (under the interstate commerce power).

C. Inherent Powers

Powers that belong to the national government simply by virtue of being a sovereign state in the international community. They are not tied to specific clauses, but exist as inherent attributes of sovereignty (e.g., acquiring new territory, controlling national borders, expelling undocumented aliens, defending against foreign subversion).

D. Reserved Powers (The States)

Under the Tenth Amendment, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

• The Police Powers: States possess the broad, inherent authority to enact legislation promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of their inhabitants.
• Examples of Reserved Powers: Establishing public school systems, administering local elections and voter registration, issuing professional and driver's licenses, creating municipal governments, regulating marriage and divorce, establishing criminal law codes for non-federal offenses.

E. Concurrent Powers

Powers held and exercised simultaneously by both the national government and state governments within their respective jurisdictions:

• Levying and collecting taxes (citizens pay both federal and state income taxes).
• Borrowing money on public credit.
• Establishing court systems.
• Enacting, enforcing, and adjudicating laws.
• Chartering commercial banks and corporations.
• Exercising eminent domain (taking private property for public use with just compensation under the Fifth Amendment).

F. Prohibited (Denied) Powers

Powers explicitly denied to government to protect individual liberty:

• Denied to both National and State Governments:
  • Bills of Attainder: Legislative acts that inflict punishment on specific individuals or groups without a judicial trial.
  • Ex Post Facto Laws: Retroactive criminal statutes that punish actions committed before the law was enacted, or increase the severity of punishment retroactively.
  • Granting Titles of Nobility: Formal creation of aristocratic titles.
• Denied to the National Government Alone (Article I, Section 9): Suspending the writ of habeas corpus except in cases of rebellion or invasion; taxing exports from any state.
• Denied to State Governments Alone (Article I, Section 10): Entering into foreign treaties or alliances; coining money; emitting bills of credit; maintaining standing armies or navies in peacetime without congressional consent; levying duties on imports or exports.

---

3. Interstate Relations and Constitutional Clauses

Article IV of the Constitution governs "horizontal federalism"—the legal relationships and obligations among the fifty states:

A. The Full Faith and Credit Clause (Article IV, Section 1)

Requires each state to recognize and give legal effect to the "public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State." A legal judgment, driver's license, divorce decree, or civil debt awarded in a Texas court must be recognized and enforced by courts in Ohio.

B. The Privileges and Immunities Clause (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1)

Prohibits states from unreasonably discriminating against citizens of other states. A state cannot deny out-of-state residents access to state courts, the right to buy or hold property, or protection by state police.

• Permissible Distinctions: States may draw reasonable distinctions where state taxpayer funding or local political sovereignty is involved (e.g., charging higher tuition for out-of-state students at state universities, or restricting voting in state elections to bona fide residents).

C. The Extradition Clause (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2)

Mandates that an individual charged with treason, felony, or other crime who flees across state lines must, upon the demand of the executive authority of the state from which they fled, be delivered up and returned to face justice.

D. The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2)

Establishes that the U.S. Constitution, federal statutes enacted under constitutional authority, and national treaties are the "supreme Law of the Land." If a state constitutional provision or state statute directly conflicts with a valid federal law, the state law is null and void (the doctrine of federal preemption).

---

4. Landmark Marshall Court Rulings on Federalism

Under Chief Justice John Marshall (1801–1835), the Supreme Court issued two monumental opinions that fundamentally cemented national supremacy and expanded federal implied powers:

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

• Background: In 1816, Congress chartered the Second Bank of the United States. In 1818, the state of Maryland levied a heavy tax on all banks operating in the state not chartered by the state legislature, targeting the Baltimore branch of the national bank. Bank cashier James McCulloch refused to pay the tax.
• Issue 1: Does Congress have the constitutional authority to charter a national bank?
  • Holding: Yes. Although chartering a corporation is not an enumerated power, Marshall held that under the Necessary and Proper Clause, Congress has broad implied powers to select reasonable means to execute its enumerated fiscal duties (taxing, borrowing, coining money, and supporting armies). Marshall declared that "necessary" does not mean "absolutely indispensable," but rather "convenient, or useful."
• Issue 2: Can a state tax an entity of the federal government?
  • Holding: No. Under the Supremacy Clause, federal authority reigns supreme over state law. Because "the power to tax involves the power to destroy," allowing a state to tax a federal institution would subordinate the national government to state sovereignty.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

• Background: The New York state legislature granted Robert Livingston and Robert Fulton an exclusive monopoly to operate steamboats on New York waters, which was licensed to Aaron Ogden. Thomas Gibbons operated a competing steamboat service between New York and New Jersey under a federal coasting license granted by an act of Congress. Ogden sued to stop Gibbons.
• Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Gibbons. Marshall defined commerce broadly as all commercial intercourse between nations and parts of nations, including navigation. Furthermore, under the Interstate Commerce Clause, federal power over interstate commerce is comprehensive, supreme, and preempts conflicting state monopolies.

---

5. The Historical Evolution of Federalism

[ DUAL FEDERALISM: 1789–1930s ]             [ COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM: 1930s–Present ]
       "Layer Cake"                                    "Marble Cake"
------------------------------                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Federal Powers (Foreign, Defense)             Federal & State Powers Mingled Together
------------------------------                 Shared Costs, Administration & Goals
  State Powers (Police, Welfare)               (Medicaid, Highways, Welfare, Education)
------------------------------                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dual Federalism ("Layer Cake" Federalism: 1789–1930s)

• Characterized by a strict, clear jurisdictional division of responsibilities between the national and state governments.
• The national government exercised exclusive control over national defense, foreign policy, and foreign/interstate tariffs, while state governments exercised exclusive control over civil rights, criminal justice, education, labor conditions, and public welfare.
• The Supreme Court acted as an active referee, regularly striking down federal attempts to regulate manufacturing or child labor as infringements on state Tenth Amendment reserved powers (e.g., Hammer v. Dagenhart, 1918).

Cooperative Federalism ("Marble Cake" Federalism: 1930s–Present)

• Sparked by the economic devastation of the Great Depression, Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, and Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society.
• National and state governments share responsibilities, costs, and administration in overlapping policy arenas (e.g., interstate highway construction, unemployment insurance, Medicaid, and environmental protection).
• The boundaries between national and state spheres are blurred and intertwined, resembling a marble cake.

---

6. Fiscal Federalism and the Dynamics of Intergovernmental Aid

Fiscal federalism refers to the pattern of spending, taxing, and providing grants in the federal system. Grants-in-aid represent the primary financial lever by which the federal government influences state policy priorities.

Categorical Grants

Federal funds allocated to states and municipalities for specific, narrowly defined purposes:

1. Formula Grants: Distributed according to a precise mathematical formula established by federal statute or regulation based on demographic factors like state population, poverty rates, or per-capita income (e.g., Medicaid, Title I educational funding).
2. Project Grants: Awarded on a competitive basis to state, local, or non-governmental applicants who submit detailed grant proposals (e.g., National Science Foundation research grants, highway safety initiatives).

• Conditions of Aid ("Strings Attached"): To receive categorical funds, states must comply with specific federal directives. In South Dakota v. Dole (1987), the Supreme Court upheld federal legislation conditioning 5% of federal highway funds on states raising their legal drinking age to 21, establishing that Congress may attach reasonable conditions to federal funds to promote the general welfare.

Block Grants

Federal funds grouped into broad, generalized functional areas (such as community development, public health, or law enforcement) that give states wide latitude and administrative discretion on how the money is spent. Block grants are strongly favored by advocates of state autonomy.

The Devolution Revolution and Welfare Reform

During the 1980s and 1990s, conservative political leaders launched the Devolution Revolution—an effort to scale back the size of the national government and transfer policy responsibility, discretion, and funding back to the states.

• PRWORA of 1996: The high-water mark of devolution occurred when Congress and President Bill Clinton enacted the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (welfare reform). It dismantled the sixty-year-old New Deal entitlement program Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC, a rigid categorical grant) and replaced it with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)—a fixed block grant that gave states broad authority to design their own work requirements, eligibility standards, and time limits.

Mandates and Unfunded Mandates

Federal rules, statutes, and standards that compel state and local governments to comply with national requirements under threat of civil or criminal penalties, or as a condition of receiving federal assistance.

• Unfunded Mandates: Requirements imposed on states without accompanying federal funding to cover implementation costs. Examples include the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which mandated retrofitting public buildings and buses with wheelchair ramps, and the Clean Air Act.
• Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA): Requires the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to identify and analyze any federal mandate exceeding specified financial thresholds, establishing procedural hurdles to curb unfunded federal burdens.

Judicial Limits on Federal Commerce Power: United States v. Lopez (1995)

Following six decades of unbroken expansion of congressional power under the Interstate Commerce Clause, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice William Rehnquist reasserted constitutional limits in United States v. Lopez (1995):

• Issue: High school senior Alfonso Lopez was convicted under the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which made carrying a firearm in a school zone a federal crime. Congress justified the law under the Commerce Clause, arguing that school gun violence disrupts education, adversely affecting the national economy.
• Holding: The Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that the federal law was unconstitutional. Possession of a gun in a local school zone is a non-economic, purely local criminal activity that does not "substantially affect" interstate commerce. The Court emphasized that accepting the government's expansive logic would obliterate any distinction between national and local authority, usurping state police powers under the Tenth Amendment.