2.4 Standard V: Investment Analysis, Recommendations & Actions and Standard VII: Responsibilities as a CFA Member or Candidate

2.4 Standard V: Investment Analysis, Recommendations & Actions and Standard VII: Responsibilities as a CFA Member or Candidate

Why this matters at Level II: the Ethics learning modules ask you to apply the Code and Standards to a fact pattern, not to recite them. Standard V is the Standard most often violated in the research-note vignettes that dominate Level II Ethics item sets, and Standard VII is the one candidates most often get wrong on a single sentence of wording.

---

1. Standard V(A): Diligence and Reasonable Basis

Members and candidates must exercise diligence, independence, and thoroughness in analysing investments and making recommendations, and must have a reasonable and adequate basis, supported by appropriate research and investigation, for any analysis, recommendation, or action.

Three fact patterns recur in Level II vignettes:

1. Relying on a third party. Using an outside research provider, a sell-side note, or a data vendor is permitted, but only after the member has made reasonable efforts to determine that the source is sound. Reasonable efforts include reviewing the provider's assumptions, the rigour of its process, the independence of its review, and whether its own analysts are qualified. A member who simply forwards an external buy recommendation without any review has violated V(A), even if the recommendation turns out to be correct.
2. Relying on a quantitative model. A member who uses a factor screen, a machine-learning classifier, or an option-pricing model must understand its inputs, assumptions, and limits, and must test how it behaves outside the range of data used to build it. "The model said so" is never a reasonable basis. This is the point where Level II Ethics deliberately connects to Quantitative Methods: a model fitted to a non-stationary series, or one whose out-of-sample error explodes, is not an adequate basis.
3. Group research reports. If a member disagrees with the conclusion of a team report, the member is not required to dissociate as long as the report reflects a reasonable and adequate basis and the member's name is attached only to the process, not to a specific opinion the member rejects. Members may ask that their names be removed; if the basis itself is unreasonable, dissociation becomes mandatory.

The level of diligence expected scales with the role. A supervisory analyst who signs off on a note carries more responsibility than a junior contributor. Secondary or "one-off" recommendations do not carry a lower bar.

---

2. Standard V(B): Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients

Standard V(B) has four operative requirements:

Standard V(B) also requires prompt disclosure of any material change to the investment process. Adding a machine-learning overlay to a previously fundamental process, or switching a benchmark, is material. Routine parameter re-estimation inside a disclosed process is not.

Brevity is permitted. A member may issue a short recommendation summary as long as the supporting detail is available to clients on request and the summary does not become misleading through omission.

---

3. Standard V(C): Record Retention

Members must develop and maintain appropriate records supporting their analyses, recommendations, actions, and other investment-related communications.

• Records may be paper or electronic; the substance, not the medium, matters.
• Where no regulator specifies a period, CFA Institute recommends retaining records for seven years.
• Records created in the course of employment are the property of the firm. A member changing employers may not take files, models, or client lists without written permission — this is where V(C) collides with Standard IV(A) Loyalty in vignettes.
• Reconstructing a supporting file "from memory" after the fact does not satisfy V(C). Working from publicly available information only is the one permitted way to rebuild a research process at a new firm.

---

4. Standard VII: Responsibilities as a CFA Institute Member or Candidate

Standard VII(A): Conduct as Participants in CFA Institute Programs

Members and candidates must not engage in conduct that compromises the reputation or integrity of CFA Institute, the CFA designation, or the integrity, validity, or security of CFA Institute programs. In practice this prohibits:

• disclosing or soliciting specific exam questions or content, including in online forums and study groups, in any window after the exam;
• misrepresenting information on a Professional Conduct Statement or in the charter application;
• violating testing-centre rules, including continuing to work after time is called.

Expressing an opinion about CFA Institute, its policies, its curriculum, or its exam difficulty is not a violation. The line is content and integrity, not criticism.

Standard VII(B): Reference to CFA Institute, the CFA Designation, and the CFA Program

Members must not misrepresent or exaggerate the meaning or implications of membership, holding the CFA designation, or candidacy in the CFA Program.

Correct usage rules that Level II tests almost verbatim:

• CFA is an adjective or proper noun, never a plural or possessive: "she is a CFA charterholder", not "she is a CFA" and not "CFA's".
• There is no partial designation. "Level II CFA", "CFA Level II" after a name, or "CFA (expected 2027)" are all violations. A permitted factual statement is "candidate in the CFA Program, Level II" or "passed all three levels of the CFA Program".
• Membership is a continuing state: to claim membership a member must complete the annual Professional Conduct Statement and pay dues. A lapsed member may not use the designation until reinstated.
• The designation may never be presented as a predictor of performance. "Our CFA charterholders deliver superior returns" violates VII(B) (and also Standard III(D) if it presents performance misleadingly).

5. Applying Standards V and VII in a Level II Vignette

Level II Ethics item sets present three to five actions inside one narrative and ask which is least likely to violate the Code and Standards, or which specific Standard is violated. The efficient method is to label each action with a Standard number before reading the answer choices.

Worked fact pattern. Elena Rusu is an analyst at a firm that publishes equity research. During one week she:

1. Publishes a note on a semiconductor issuer with a 12-month target price derived from an internally built discounted cash flow model whose growth input she took from an outside consultant's report, without reviewing the consultant's methodology.
2. Writes in the note: "Free cash flow will rise 22% next year."
3. Adds a proprietary sentiment score built from earnings-call transcripts to her published process, without telling clients.
4. Deletes her model spreadsheet after publication because the firm's storage quota was exceeded.
5. Signs her note "Elena Rusu, Level II CFA".

Note that none of these five items is a Standard III or IV issue. Vignette writers deliberately place Standard V facts inside a client-relationship narrative so that candidates reach for "Loyalty, Prudence, and Care" by reflex.

Fast decision rules

• If the fact pattern turns on what the analyst knew or checked, it is V(A).
• If it turns on what the client was told, it is V(B).
• If it turns on what was written down and kept, it is V(C).
• If it turns on exam content or the letters after a name, it is VII.

Recommended firm procedures

For each Standard V element, the Standards of Practice Handbook expects a member to be able to recommend a concrete procedure rather than an aspiration:

• maintain a written research review policy naming who approves a note and against what checklist;
• keep a model inventory documenting each model's data window, assumptions, and revalidation date;
• publish a disclosure document describing the investment process and require an update whenever a material process change is approved;
• set a record-retention schedule of at least seven years where no regulation binds, with electronic archiving that survives an employee's departure.