3.4 Dangling/Misplaced Modifiers & Wordiness Reduction
Key Takeaways
- Modifiers must be placed directly adjacent to the noun or pronoun they describe to prevent ambiguity and illogical statements.
- Dangling modifiers occur when an introductory modifying phrase lacks a logical subject in the sentence, incorrectly modifying whatever noun follows the comma.
- Misplaced modifiers are separated from their target noun, leading to absurd or unintentional meanings in narrative reports.
- Conciseness requires replacing bloated police jargon and wordy prepositions with direct, precise action verbs and plain language.
- Eliminating redundant expressions (e.g., 'surrounding environment,' 'consensus of opinion,' 'past history') improves narrative efficiency and PELLETB clarity scores.
3.4 Dangling/Misplaced Modifiers & Wordiness Reduction
In law enforcement writing, clarity and conciseness are paramount. A police report must communicate facts directly, without ambiguity, and in the fewest words necessary. Two major obstacles to effective incident writing are modifier placement errors (dangling and misplaced modifiers) and wordiness (bloated police jargon and redundant expressions). On the California POST PELLETB Writing subtest, test-takers are evaluated extensively on their ability to detect illogical modifier attachments and to transform bloated sentences into concise, direct prose.
1. Demystifying Modifiers in Police Narratives
A modifier is a word, phrase, or clause that describes, clarifies, or provides additional detail about another element in a sentence. Adjectives, adverbs, prepositional phrases, and participial phrases all function as modifiers.
- Standard Rule of Proximity: To ensure clarity, a modifier must be placed as close as possible to the specific noun or pronoun it is intended to modify.
When modifiers are separated from their target nouns, or when the target noun is omitted entirely, the sentence becomes grammatically distorted and often conveys an absurd or illogical meaning.
2. Dangling Modifiers: Identification and Repair
A dangling modifier occurs when an introductory modifying phrase—usually an -ing or -ed participial phrase—lacks a logical subject in the main clause. Grammatically, an introductory phrase modifies the noun that immediately follows the comma. If that noun cannot logically perform the action described in the phrase, the modifier "dangles."
The Classic Law Enforcement Modifier Trap
Consider the following sentence commonly seen on police report writing exams:
- Dangling Modifier: Walking down the hallway, the stolen firearm was found by Officer Davis.
- Analysis: The introductory phrase is "Walking down the hallway." What noun immediately follows the comma? "The stolen firearm." Grammatically, this asserts that the stolen firearm was walking down the hallway! Because a firearm cannot walk, the modifier dangles illogically.
Two Methods for Correcting Dangling Modifiers
Method A: Make the True Actor the Subject of the Main Clause
Change the subject following the comma so that it represents the person or entity performing the action in the introductory phrase.
- Corrected (Method A): Walking down the hallway, Officer Davis found the stolen firearm.
- Check: Who was walking down the hallway? Officer Davis. The modifier now correctly attaches to Officer Davis.
Method B: Turn the Introductory Phrase into a Dependent Clause
Expand the introductory modifier into a complete dependent clause containing its own subject and verb.
- Corrected (Method B): While Officer Davis was walking down the hallway, he found the stolen firearm.
Additional Law Enforcement Examples
-
Dangling: Searching the suspect's vehicle, a concealed dagger was discovered under the floor mat.
- Analysis: Did the concealed dagger search the vehicle? No.
- Corrected: Searching the suspect's vehicle, Deputy Martinez discovered a concealed dagger under the floor mat.
-
Dangling: After reviewing the security footage, the suspect was arrested.
- Analysis: Did the suspect review the security footage? No, the officer did.
- Corrected: After reviewing the security footage, Officer Jenkins arrested the suspect.
3. Misplaced Modifiers: Causes and Corrections
A misplaced modifier occurs when a modifier is placed too far from the word it modifies, creating confusion or unintended humor. Unlike a dangling modifier, the target noun is present in the sentence—it is simply located in the wrong position.
Misplaced Modifier Examples in Reports
-
Misplaced: Officer Martinez arrested the suspect wearing a bulletproof vest.
- Problem: Is Officer Martinez wearing the vest, or is the suspect? As written, "wearing a bulletproof vest" attaches to "suspect." If the officer wore the vest, the modifier is misplaced.
- Corrected (Officer wearing vest): Wearing a bulletproof vest, Officer Martinez arrested the suspect.
- Corrected (Suspect wearing vest): Officer Martinez arrested the suspect, who was wearing a bulletproof vest.
-
Misplaced: The officer retrieved the spent bullet casing from the victim that was fired from a 9mm pistol.
- Problem: Grammatically implies the victim was fired from a 9mm pistol.
- Corrected: From the victim, the officer retrieved the spent bullet casing that was fired from a 9mm pistol.
The Danger of Limiting Modifiers (Only, Almost, Nearly, Barely)
Limiting modifiers must be placed immediately before the word they qualify. Changing their position alters the entire meaning of the sentence.
- Sentence A: Officer Kim only advised the suspect of his rights. (Officer Kim advised rights and did nothing else—did not arrest, search, or question).
- Sentence B: Officer Kim advised only the suspect of his rights. (Officer Kim advised the suspect, but not the bystander or co-defendant).
4. Wordiness Reduction & Eliminating Bloated Police Jargon
Law enforcement narratives frequently suffer from "wordiness"—the unnecessary use of bloated, pseudo-official phrases where simple, direct words would be far clearer and more effective. On the PELLETB, the clearest option is almost always the most direct and concise version that retains complete factual accuracy.
Eliminating Bloated Phrases
Replace wordy multi-word phrases with single, precise words:
| Bloated Phrase | Concise Equivalent | Report Application Example |
|---|---|---|
| at this point in time | now / currently | Officer Lee is currently processing the scene. |
| due to the fact that | because | The suspect fled because he heard sirens. |
| in the event that | if | Call dispatch if the suspect returns. |
| prior to | before | Officer Davis arrived before backup. |
| subsequent to | after | The suspect confessed after his arrest. |
| for the purpose of | to | Deputies searched the trunk to locate the stolen items. |
| in close proximity to | near | The collision occurred near Main Street. |
| conducted an investigation into | investigated | Detectives investigated the burglary. |
| made an observation of | observed | Officer Miller observed the infraction. |
| proceeded to travel | drove / walked | The suspect drove west on Highway 50. |
Eliminating Redundant Expressions
Redundancy occurs when two words express the exact same concept. Strip away deadwood words to sharpen narrative prose:
- Redundant: Past history -> Concise: History
- Redundant: Consensus of opinion -> Concise: Consensus
- Redundant: Completely eliminated -> Concise: Eliminated
- Redundant: Red in color -> Concise: Red
- Redundant: Rectangular in shape -> Concise: Rectangular
- Redundant: Travel at a high rate of speed -> Concise: Speeding / Traveling at 80 mph
Before-and-After Conciseness Transformations
- Bloated Narrative: Subsequent to securing the perimeter, Officer Smith made an observation of a male subject proceeding to travel in close proximity to the residence at a high rate of speed. (29 words)
- Concise Narrative: After securing the perimeter, Officer Smith observed a male subject speeding near the residence. (14 words - 52% word reduction, zero loss of facts).
5. PELLETB Clarity Test Strategy
When answering Writing Clarity questions on the PELLETB:
- Scan for Introductory Phrases: If a sentence begins with an -ing phrase (Walking down the street..., Searching the trunk...), verify that the noun following the comma is the true actor. Eliminate any option where the modifier dangles.
- Identify Bloated Jargon: Strike out options containing wordy expressions like "due to the fact that," "at this point in time," or "made an observation of."
- Verify Misplaced Adverbs: Ensure limiting adverbs like "only" or "nearly" are adjacent to the exact word they modify.
- Choose Direct Active Sentences: Select the sentence that is grammatically correct, active in voice, direct in modifier placement, and free of redundant filler.
Identify the sentence that correctly places the modifier to eliminate a dangling or misplaced modifier error.
Which of the following options expresses the narrative event with optimal conciseness and clarity, avoiding official police jargon and wordiness?