3.10 Parameter Tradeoffs: Resolution and Scan Time
Key Takeaways
- Acquisition Time (Ta) for a standard 2D spin echo sequence is calculated using the formula Ta = TR × Ny × NEX, where Ny is the number of phase encoding steps.
- Fast Spin Echo (FSE) sequences accelerate scan time by the Echo Train Length (ETL) or Turbo Factor, yielding the scan time formula Ta = (TR × Ny × NEX) / ETL.
- Spatial Resolution is determined by voxel size; smaller voxels yield higher spatial resolution but result in lower SNR and potentially longer scan times.
- Parallel Imaging (SENSE/GRAPPA) uses multi-channel coils to skip phase encoding steps, reducing scan time by the acceleration factor (R) but decreasing SNR by a factor of g × √R (where g is the geometry factor).
Parameter Tradeoffs: Resolution and Scan Time
In MRI, optimizing the balance between spatial resolution and scan time is a critical task for the technologist. High spatial resolution is required to resolve small anatomical details, but it typically demands smaller voxel sizes. Smaller voxels contain fewer spins, resulting in lower SNR, which technologists often compensate for by using parameters that increase the total acquisition time.
Acquisition Time Calculations
The scan time for an MRI sequence depends on the pulse sequence family and the selected scan parameters. Technologists must master the mathematical formulas for calculating acquisition times for the ARRT registry exam.
1. 2D Spin Echo (SE) and Gradient Echo (GRE) Sequence
For standard 2D sequences, the acquisition time ($T_a$) is determined by:
Where:
-
TR (Repetition Time): The time between successive RF excitation pulses (in seconds).
-
$N_y$ (Phase Matrix): The number of phase encoding steps.
-
NEX (Number of Excitations): The number of times each phase line is collected.
-
Worked Example: A T1-weighted spin echo sequence is programmed with a TR of 500 ms, a phase matrix of 256, and a NEX of 2.
2. Fast Spin Echo (FSE) Sequence
FSE sequences collect multiple phase encoding lines during each TR interval by applying a series of 180-degree refocusing pulses. The number of echoes collected per TR is the Echo Train Length (ETL) or Turbo Factor. The formula is:
- Worked Example: A T2-weighted FSE sequence is programmed with a TR of 4000 ms, a phase matrix of 256, a NEX of 2, and an ETL of 16.
3. 3D Volume Acquisition
3D sequences excite an entire volume of tissue rather than individual slices. Spatial localization along the slice axis requires an additional phase encoding step, called slice encoding (or partitions). The formula is:
Where $N_z$ is the number of slice-encoding partitions.
- Worked Example: A 3D gradient echo sequence has a TR of 20 ms, a phase matrix of 256, 64 slice partitions, and a NEX of 1.
Spatial Resolution Factors
Spatial resolution is defined as the ability to distinguish two separate points in tissue as distinct structures. It is determined by the size of the voxels: smaller voxels result in higher spatial resolution.
Voxel Dimensions
Voxel size is determined by three parameters:
- Pixel Width (Frequency axis): $\text{FOV}_{\text{frequency}} \div \text{Frequency Matrix}$
- Pixel Length (Phase axis): $\text{FOV}_{\text{phase}} \div \text{Phase Matrix}$
- Voxel Depth (Slice axis): Slice thickness
Parameter Adjustments for High Resolution:
- Reduce FOV: Decreasing the FOV reduces the pixel size, increasing spatial resolution, but decreases SNR.
- Increase Matrix Size: Increasing matrix size (e.g., from 192 to 256 phase steps) decreases pixel size, increasing spatial resolution.
- Decrease Slice Thickness: Thinner slices reduce voxel depth, increasing spatial resolution along the z-axis and reducing partial volume averaging.
Phase Matrix vs. Frequency Matrix Tradeoffs
Understanding how the matrix dimensions affect scan time is critical:
- Frequency Encoding Matrix: Increasing the frequency matrix size (e.g., from 256 to 512) increases spatial resolution along the readout axis but has no effect on scan time. Frequency encoding occurs during readout, which takes milliseconds.
- Phase Encoding Matrix: Increasing the phase matrix size (e.g., from 256 to 512) increases spatial resolution along the phase axis but increases scan time. Each phase encoding line requires a separate TR interval.
Rectangular FOV / Asymmetric FOV
To save scan time when imaging anatomy that is longer in one direction (e.g., spine or extremities), a rectangular FOV (rFOV) is used.
- By reducing the phase FOV (e.g., to 50% of the frequency FOV), the number of phase encoding steps ($N_y$) can be cut in half while maintaining the same pixel size (spatial resolution).
- This reduces the scan time by 50% without altering spatial resolution or causing aliasing, provided the anatomy does not exceed the borders of the reduced phase FOV.
Advanced Acceleration Techniques
When clinical needs require short scan times (e.g., for pediatric, dyspneic, or claustrophobic patients), technologists use advanced acceleration options:
1. Fractional NEX (Partial Fourier)
- The Physics: k-space has conjugate symmetry, meaning the top half is a mirror image of the bottom half.
- The Method: The scanner collects only a fraction of the phase lines (e.g., 60% or 0.75 NEX) and mathematically calculates the remaining lines.
- Tradeoff: Scan time is reduced proportionally. However, because less total signal is collected, the SNR decreases by $\sqrt{\text{fraction collected}}$.
2. Parallel Imaging (SENSE / GRAPPA)
- The Physics: Uses spatial sensitivity profiles of multi-channel phased-array receiver coils to reconstruct the spatial origin of signals.
- The Method: The scanner skips lines of phase encoding during acquisition, reducing the number of phase lines by the acceleration factor ($R$).
- Tradeoffs:
- Scan time is reduced by a factor of $R$.
- SNR is reduced due to the reduction in data collection, calculated as: where $g$ is the geometry factor of the receiver coil array.
- If the acceleration factor ($R$) is set too high, unfolding artifacts (aliasing) can occur.
Clinical Optimization Strategies
Technologists must select parameters based on the patient's clinical situation:
- Motion-Prone Patients (Pediatric, Claustrophobic): Prioritize scan speed. Increase parallel imaging acceleration ($R$), increase ETL on FSE sequences, use rectangular FOV, and reduce NEX.
- High-Resolution Needs (IACs, Pituitary): Prioritize spatial resolution. Use a small FOV, high matrix, and thin slices. Compensate for the low SNR by increasing the NEX (accepting longer scan times), using dedicated local coils, or scanning at a higher field strength ($3.0\text{ T}$).
Resolution and Scan Time Summary Table
| Parameter Change | Spatial Resolution | Scan Time | Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increase FOV | Decrease | No Effect | Increase |
| Increase Phase Matrix | Increase | Increase | Decrease |
| Increase Frequency Matrix | Increase | No Effect | Decrease |
| Increase Slice Thickness | Decrease | No Effect | Increase |
| Increase NEX | No Effect | Increase | Increase ($\sqrt{\text{NEX}}$) |
| Increase ETL | Decrease (Blurring) | Decrease | Decrease |
| Enable Parallel Imaging | No Effect | Decrease | Decrease |
A fast spin echo (FSE) sequence is programmed with a TR of 3000 ms, a phase matrix of 256, a NEX of 2, and an echo train length (ETL) of 12. What is the total acquisition time?
Which of the following adjustments will increase spatial resolution without increasing the overall acquisition time?
When applying parallel imaging with an acceleration factor of 2 (R = 2) to a sequence, how are scan time and SNR affected?