2.2 Claude Code Workflows
Key Takeaways
- Project memory should capture durable conventions, not one-off task notes.
- Permissions should match the risk of tools and shell actions.
- Slash commands package repeatable workflows for consistent execution.
- Hooks and headless usage require validation because less human steering is present.
Configure for Repeatability
Claude Code is most useful when the project gives it durable context and clear boundaries. A good setup tells Claude what conventions matter, which tools may run, how to validate work, and when human approval is required.
Configuration Concepts
| Concept | Purpose |
|---|---|
| CLAUDE.md | Durable project memory |
| Settings | Local workflow configuration |
| Permissions | Control risky actions |
| Slash commands | Reusable task recipes |
| Hooks | Run validation or policy checks |
| Subagents | Narrow specialist roles |
| MCP servers | Tool and context integrations |
Production Mindset
For headless or CI-style work, outputs must be predictable. Require explicit success criteria, scoped permissions, and automated validation. A workflow that depends on a human noticing every bad intermediate step is not ready for unattended use.
Review Questions
When reviewing a Claude Code setup, ask whether project memory is stable, whether commands are repeatable, whether risky shell actions are gated, whether hooks run useful checks, and whether MCP servers expose only the tools and resources needed for the task.
Validation Habit
Pair each automation path with a concrete command or review step that proves the requested change actually worked.
What belongs in durable project memory for Claude Code?