All Practice Exams

200+ Free TX Labor & Employment Law Specialist Practice Questions

Pass your Texas Board Certified - Labor & Employment Law exam on the first try — instant access, no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
200+ Questions
100% Free

Loading questions...

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: TX Labor & Employment Law Specialist Exam

350 scaled

Passing score for the TBLS Labor & Employment exam

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

~6 hours

Exam length (3-hour essay plus multiple-choice portion)

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

5 years

Minimum Texas Bar membership required to apply

TBLS Attorney Rules

180 / 300 days

TCHRA charge deadline (general / sexual harassment)

Texas Labor Code Sections 21.202, 21.201(g)

Section 15.50

Texas statute governing covenants not to compete

Texas Business & Commerce Code

100+

Free practice questions available here

OpenExamPrep question bank

Texas Board Certification in Labor & Employment Law requires an active Texas Bar license for 5+ years, substantial involvement in labor and employment law for 3 years (in at least 3 statutory areas, one involving the NLRA), at least 24 hours of NLRA-related CLE, peer review, and passing the TBLS exam (approximately 6 hours; a 3-hour essay portion plus roughly 100 multiple-choice questions; 350 scaled passing score; fees set by TBLS). Tested law spans Title VII (McDonnell Douglas, Griggs, Faragher/Ellerth, Groff, Bostock, 1991 damages caps), the ADA (ADAAA, direct threat), the ADEA (Gross but-for causation, OWBPA), the FMLA (12 months/1,250 hours/50 within 75 miles; 12- and 26-week entitlements), the FLSA ($7.25 minimum wage, 1.5x overtime, $684/week salary basis, tip credit, collective actions), the NLRA (Section 7 and 8(a), bargaining, strikes, Weingarten, Gissel, Texas right-to-work), and Texas law (TCHRA Chapter 21 deadlines, Section 451.001 workers' comp retaliation, nonsubscriber liability, Sabine Pilot, and non-competes under 15.50/15.51).

Sample TX Labor & Employment Law Specialist Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your TX Labor & Employment Law Specialist exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 200+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1An employee sues her private employer for race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The company employed 12 people during the year of the alleged discrimination and the prior year. What is the most likely outcome on a motion to dismiss for lack of coverage?
A.The claim survives because Title VII covers all private employers regardless of size
B.The claim survives because the threshold for Title VII is 8 employees
C.The claim is dismissed because Title VII applies only to employers with 15 or more employees
D.The claim is dismissed because Title VII covers only public employers
Explanation: Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year. With only 12 employees, the employer is not covered and the claim is properly dismissed for lack of coverage.
2A plaintiff alleging disparate treatment under Title VII has only circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent. Which analytical framework governs the order and allocation of proof?
A.The Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense framework
B.The Cat's Paw imputation framework
C.The Griggs business-necessity framework
D.The McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework
Explanation: McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green established the burden-shifting framework for circumstantial-evidence disparate-treatment claims: the plaintiff makes a prima facie case, the employer articulates a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason, and the plaintiff must then show that reason is pretext for discrimination.
3An employer uses a facially neutral physical-strength test for a clerical job. The test screens out a statistically disproportionate number of women, and it is not job-related for the position. Under Title VII, what theory best describes the employee's claim?
A.Disparate impact under Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
B.Disparate treatment requiring proof of intent
C.Quid pro quo harassment
D.Constructive discharge
Explanation: Disparate impact, recognized in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. and codified in the 1991 Civil Rights Act, targets facially neutral practices that disproportionately harm a protected group and are not justified by business necessity. No proof of discriminatory intent is required.
4A supervisor conditions a subordinate's promotion on submitting to sexual demands. The subordinate refuses and is denied the promotion. What category of sexual harassment does this present under Title VII?
A.Hostile work environment harassment
B.Disparate impact
C.Quid pro quo harassment
D.Retaliation
Explanation: Quid pro quo harassment occurs when a tangible employment benefit is conditioned on submission to unwelcome sexual conduct. Because the supervisor conditioned a promotion on sexual demands and a tangible action (denial of promotion) followed, this is quid pro quo harassment for which the employer is strictly liable.
5An employee is subjected to a co-worker's severe and pervasive racial slurs. The employer wants to assert the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense. Which fact would DEFEAT availability of that defense?
A.The harassment culminated in a tangible employment action such as termination
B.The employer published an anti-harassment policy with a complaint procedure
C.The employee unreasonably failed to use the complaint procedure
D.The harasser was a co-worker rather than a supervisor
Explanation: Under Faragher v. Boca Raton and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, the affirmative defense is unavailable when the supervisor's harassment culminates in a tangible employment action (e.g., discharge, demotion). When a tangible action occurs, the employer is vicariously and strictly liable.
6An employee files an internal complaint alleging sex discrimination. Two weeks later, she is demoted. She lacks direct evidence the demotion was discriminatory but has strong evidence it was a response to her complaint. What Title VII claim is best supported?
A.Disparate impact
B.Constructive discharge
C.Failure to accommodate
D.Retaliation for engaging in protected activity
Explanation: Title VII's anti-retaliation provision prohibits adverse action against an employee for opposing discrimination or participating in proceedings. Filing an internal complaint is protected opposition activity, and a materially adverse action (demotion) causally linked to it supports a retaliation claim under Burlington Northern v. White.
7An applicant in Texas wants to pursue a Title VII race-discrimination claim in federal court. What procedural step must she complete before filing suit?
A.File a timely charge with the EEOC and receive a right-to-sue notice
B.Obtain a jury demand from the state court
C.Win a workers' compensation hearing first
D.Demand arbitration under the FAA
Explanation: Title VII requires exhaustion of administrative remedies: a charge must be filed with the EEOC (or a deferral agency) and a right-to-sue notice obtained before bringing suit. In a deferral state like Texas, the charge generally must be filed within 300 days of the unlawful practice.
8An employer refuses to hire a qualified applicant because of a sincerely held religious practice that would require a minor schedule adjustment. The employer offers no accommodation and claims any accommodation is automatically an undue hardship. After Groff v. DeJoy (2023), what standard applies to the religious-accommodation defense?
A.The employer need only show a more-than-de-minimis cost
B.Religious accommodation is not required under Title VII
C.The employer must show the accommodation would result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of its business
D.The employer may refuse any accommodation that affects scheduling
Explanation: In Groff v. DeJoy (2023), the Supreme Court clarified that 'undue hardship' for Title VII religious accommodation means substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of the employer's business, rejecting the prior more-than-de-minimis reading of Hardison. A minor schedule change is unlikely to meet that heightened standard.
9An employer terminates an employee for being gay. The employee sues under Title VII. After Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), is sexual-orientation discrimination actionable?
A.No, Title VII does not reach sexual orientation
B.Only for public employers
C.Only if a state statute separately prohibits it
D.Yes, discrimination because of sexual orientation is discrimination 'because of sex' under Title VII
Explanation: In Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), the Supreme Court held that firing an individual for being homosexual or transgender is discrimination 'because of sex' under Title VII, because it necessarily takes the employee's sex into account. The claim is actionable.
10A jury finds an employer terminated an employee partly because of her sex and partly for a legitimate performance reason. The employer proves it would have made the same decision absent the sex consideration. Under Title VII's mixed-motive framework, what is the result?
A.Liability is established, but remedies are limited to declaratory/injunctive relief and attorney's fees, with no damages or reinstatement
B.The plaintiff recovers full back pay and reinstatement
C.The employer is not liable at all
D.The case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Explanation: Under the mixed-motive provisions added by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(g)(2)(B)), if the employer proves it would have taken the same action absent the impermissible motive, the plaintiff still establishes a Title VII violation but the court may grant only declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees and costs, not damages or reinstatement.

About the TX Labor & Employment Law Specialist Exam

The Texas Board Certified - Labor & Employment Law examination is administered by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization (TBLS) to attorneys with substantial experience in labor and employment law who seek the Board Certified designation. The exam is a roughly six-hour written test combining a three-hour essay portion with an approximately 100-question multiple-choice portion. It tests federal employment statutes (Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA, the FMLA, the FLSA, and the NLRA) together with Texas-specific law, including the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (Labor Code Chapter 21), workers' compensation retaliation under Labor Code Section 451.001, Sabine Pilot wrongful discharge, and covenants not to compete under Business & Commerce Code Section 15.50.

Questions

100 scored questions

Time Limit

Approximately 6 hours (3-hour essay portion plus multiple-choice)

Passing Score

350 (scaled)

Exam Fee

Confirm on tbls.org (Texas Board of Legal Specialization (TBLS))

TX Labor & Employment Law Specialist Exam Content Outline

18%

Title VII & Discrimination

Disparate treatment under McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting; disparate impact under Griggs and business necessity; quid pro quo and hostile-work-environment harassment with the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense; retaliation (Burlington Northern v. White); religious accommodation under Groff v. DeJoy; Bostock sexual-orientation/gender-identity coverage; mixed-motive and the same-decision defense; PDA and Young v. UPS; Equal Pay Act defenses; Ledbetter paycheck-accrual rule; and the 1991 Act tiered damages caps. Employer coverage requires 15+ employees; EEOC charge within 300 days in Texas.

16%

ADA, ADEA & FMLA

ADA reasonable accommodation and the interactive process; broad ADAAA construction; record-of and regarded-as prongs; direct-threat defense; pre-offer medical-inquiry limits. ADEA protects workers 40+ at employers with 20+ employees, requires but-for causation under Gross v. FBL, and governs OWBPA waiver requirements (45-day consideration, 7-day revocation). FMLA eligibility (12 months, 1,250 hours, 50 employees within 75 miles), serious health condition, 12-week and 26-week military-caregiver entitlements, intermittent leave, reinstatement, interference/retaliation, and ADA overlap after FMLA exhaustion.

16%

FLSA Wage & Hour

Federal minimum wage of $7.25 (Texas adopts the federal rate); overtime at one and one-half times the regular rate over 40 hours; the white-collar exemptions (salary-basis test at $684/week after the 2024 DOL increase was vacated by a Texas federal court, plus duties tests); tip credit; nondiscretionary vs. discretionary bonuses in the regular rate; independent-contractor misclassification under the economic-realities test; hours worked, meal breaks, and off-the-clock work; the Portal-to-Portal Act (Integrity Staffing v. Busk); opt-in collective actions under 29 U.S.C. 216(b); two/three-year limitations and liquidated damages; and Kasten oral-complaint retaliation.

16%

NLRA & Traditional Labor

Section 7 protected concerted activity (including in non-union workplaces and wage discussions); Section 8(a) unfair labor practices and the duty to bargain in good faith over mandatory subjects (wages, hours, terms and conditions); appropriate bargaining units and the community-of-interest test; economic vs. unfair-labor-practice strikes and striker replacement (Fleetwood/Laidlaw); impasse and lawful unilateral implementation; Weingarten representation rights; Gissel and Exchange Parts campaign limits; the Section 10(b) six-month charge period; statutory employee exclusions (supervisors, independent contractors, agricultural laborers); NLRB enforcement; and Texas right-to-work under Section 14(b).

18%

Texas Labor Code, Workers' Comp Retaliation & TCHRA

TCHRA (Labor Code Chapter 21): protected classes (race, color, disability, religion, sex, national origin, age 40+); the 180-day general and 300-day sexual-harassment administrative deadlines; the 60-day right-to-sue window (and two-year outer limit); SB 45 expanded sexual-harassment coverage to employers with one or more employees; correlation with federal law. Workers' compensation retaliation under Section 451.001 (good-faith claim, but-for causation, reinstatement and reasonable damages under 451.002, two-year limitations); nonsubscriber loss of common-law defenses (406.033); exclusive remedy (408.001); the Texas Payday Law (Chapter 61); and the Texas Whistleblower Act (Government Code Chapter 554) for public employees.

16%

Non-Competes, Contracts & Wrongful Discharge

Employment at will and its Texas exceptions; the narrow Sabine Pilot sole-cause wrongful-discharge claim for refusing to perform a criminally illegal act; covenants not to compete under Business & Commerce Code Section 15.50 (ancillary to an otherwise enforceable agreement, reasonable time/area/scope, Marsh USA and Sheshunoff consideration giving rise to a protectable interest); judicial reformation under Section 15.51(c); physician-specific criteria in Section 15.50(b) and the 2025 SB1318 health-care amendments; non-solicitation covenants; the Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Civil Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 134A); employee handbooks and at-will disclaimers; promissory estoppel; definite-term contracts; and statutory jury-service protection.

How to Pass the TX Labor & Employment Law Specialist Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: 350 (scaled)
  • Exam length: 100 questions
  • Time limit: Approximately 6 hours (3-hour essay portion plus multiple-choice)
  • Exam fee: Confirm on tbls.org

Keys to Passing

  • Complete 500+ practice questions
  • Score 80%+ consistently before scheduling
  • Focus on highest-weighted sections
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

TX Labor & Employment Law Specialist Study Tips from Top Performers

1Memorize the employer-coverage thresholds and charge deadlines cold: Title VII and the ADA cover employers with 15+ employees; the ADEA covers 20+; the EEOC charge period in Texas is 300 days; the TCHRA administrative deadline is 180 days (300 for sexual harassment) with a 60-day right-to-sue window. These numbers drive both essay and multiple-choice questions.
2Know the causation standards because they differ by statute: Title VII allows mixed-motive 'motivating factor' analysis (with a same-decision remedy limitation), the ADEA requires but-for causation under Gross v. FBL, Section 451.001 workers' comp retaliation uses a but-for standard, and Sabine Pilot requires the refusal to be the sole cause of discharge.
3Master FLSA mechanics: the $7.25 minimum wage, time-and-one-half overtime over 40 hours, the $684/week white-collar salary-basis test (remember the 2024 DOL increase was vacated by a Texas federal court), tip-credit rules, and the difference between nondiscretionary bonuses (included in the regular rate) and truly discretionary bonuses (excludable).
4Drill the Texas non-compete framework: ancillary to an otherwise enforceable agreement under Section 15.50, reasonable time/geography/scope, Marsh USA and Sheshunoff consideration giving rise to a protectable interest, mandatory reformation under Section 15.51(c), the physician-specific criteria in 15.50(b), and the 2025 SB1318 health-care amendments.
5For traditional labor, be ready to spot Section 8(a)(1) violations in fact patterns: banning wage discussions, overbroad social-media rules, Gissel plant-closing threats, and Exchange Parts timed benefits. Remember Texas is a right-to-work state under NLRA Section 14(b), so compulsory union membership or dues cannot be a condition of employment.
6Understand how the FMLA and ADA interact: an employee who exhausts 12 weeks of FMLA leave may still be entitled to a finite period of additional leave as an ADA reasonable accommodation absent undue hardship, and protected FMLA absences cannot be counted against an employee under a no-fault attendance policy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Texas Board Certified - Labor & Employment Law credential?

It is a specialty certification issued by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization (TBLS) recognizing Texas attorneys with substantial expertise in labor and employment law. Certified attorneys may advertise as Board Certified in Labor and Employment Law and must satisfy ongoing experience, CLE, and recertification requirements.

How is the TBLS Labor & Employment Law exam structured?

The exam is an approximately six-hour written test that combines a three-hour essay portion with an approximately 100-question multiple-choice portion. The passing standard is a 350 scaled score. Application and exam fees are set by TBLS; confirm current amounts on tbls.org. The exam tests federal employment statutes and Texas-specific law.

What federal employment statutes does the exam cover?

The exam covers Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (discrimination, harassment, retaliation, religious accommodation), the Americans with Disabilities Act (reasonable accommodation, direct threat), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (but-for causation under Gross, OWBPA waivers), the Family and Medical Leave Act (eligibility and leave entitlements), the Fair Labor Standards Act (minimum wage, overtime, exemptions), and the National Labor Relations Act (protected concerted activity, collective bargaining, strikes).

What is the Sabine Pilot wrongful-discharge exception in Texas?

Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. Hauck (Tex. 1985) created a narrow public-policy exception to employment at will: an employee may not be discharged solely for refusing to perform an act that the employee reasonably believes is illegal and that carries criminal penalties. Texas applies a strict sole-cause standard, so the refusal must be the only reason for the discharge.

How does Texas law treat covenants not to compete?

Under Texas Business & Commerce Code Section 15.50, a non-compete is enforceable only if it is ancillary to or part of an otherwise enforceable agreement at the time the agreement is made and contains reasonable limitations on time, geographic area, and scope of activity. If a covenant is overbroad, Section 15.51(c) requires the court to reform it to reasonable limits and enforce it as reformed. Special rules apply to physicians, and 2025 amendments (SB1318) tightened restrictions for health care practitioners.

What protections does Texas Labor Code Section 451.001 provide?

Section 451.001 prohibits an employer from discharging or discriminating against an employee because the employee filed a workers' compensation claim in good faith, hired a lawyer to pursue it, instituted a proceeding, or testified. The employee must prove that but for the claim the discharge would not have occurred when it did. Remedies include reasonable damages and reinstatement under Section 451.002, with possible exemplary damages for actual malice.

What are the TCHRA filing deadlines under Labor Code Chapter 21?

A typical discrimination complaint must be filed with the Texas Workforce Commission Civil Rights Division within 180 days of the alleged unlawful employment practice. Sexual harassment complaints have an extended 300-day deadline under Section 21.201(g). After receiving a right-to-sue notice, the employee generally must file suit within 60 days, subject to a two-year outer limit from filing the complaint.