All Practice Exams

200+ Free TX Criminal Law Specialist Practice Questions

Pass your Texas Board Certified - Criminal Law exam on the first try — instant access, no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
200+ Questions
100% Free

Loading questions...

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: TX Criminal Law Specialist Exam

~100 MCQ + 3 essays

Exam Format (afternoon MCQ + morning essays)

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

350

Scaled Passing Score

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

5 years

Minimum years in practice required

TBLS Criminal Law Standards

60 hours

Criminal law CLE required to apply

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

PC 6.03

Defines the four culpable mental states

Texas Penal Code

100+

Practice Questions Here

OpenExamPrep question bank

Texas Board Certified - Criminal Law (TBLS) requires an active Texas license, at least 5 years in practice, 25% criminal law practice over the prior 3 years, lead-counsel case requirements, 60 hours of TBLS-approved criminal law CLE, and 5 references (4 attorneys plus 1 Texas judge). The full-day exam combines a 3-hour morning session of 3 essays and a 3-hour afternoon session of about 100 multiple-choice questions, with a scaled passing score of 350. It covers the Texas Penal Code (PC 6.03 culpable mental states, Ch. 19 homicide, Ch. 12 punishment ranges, 31.03 theft ladder), the Code of Criminal Procedure (Art. 38.22 confessions, 38.23 exclusionary rule, 39.14 Michael Morton Act), constitutional procedure (Miranda, Crawford, Brady, Barker v. Wingo), the Texas Rules of Evidence, trial and punishment, and appeals and habeas (Art. 11.07/11.071). Certification lasts 5 years.

Sample TX Criminal Law Specialist Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your TX Criminal Law Specialist exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 200+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Under Texas Penal Code Section 6.03, a defendant fires a gun into a crowd, hoping to scare people but not aiming at anyone, and a bystander is killed. The defendant testifies he never wanted anyone to die but knew people were present. Which culpable mental state most accurately describes his awareness that his conduct was reasonably certain to cause death?
A.Knowingly
B.Intentionally
C.Recklessly
D.Criminal negligence
Explanation: Under Section 6.03(b), a person acts knowingly with respect to a result when he is aware that his conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result. Firing into a crowd while aware people are present and that death is reasonably certain is knowing conduct, even without the conscious desire to kill.
2A Texas prosecutor charges a defendant with criminally negligent homicide under Penal Code Section 19.05. What culpable mental state must the State prove?
A.That the defendant consciously disregarded a known risk of death
B.That the defendant failed to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death that a reasonable person would have perceived
C.That the defendant intended the victim's death
D.That the defendant knew death was reasonably certain to occur
Explanation: Criminally negligent homicide under Section 19.05 requires criminal negligence as defined in Section 6.03(d): the defendant ought to be aware of, but fails to perceive, a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur, where the failure is a gross deviation from the standard of care an ordinary person would exercise.
3A defendant intentionally shoots and kills a uniformed peace officer who is lawfully discharging an official duty, and the defendant knew the victim was a peace officer. Under the Texas Penal Code, what offense level applies?
A.Murder, a first-degree felony
B.Manslaughter, a second-degree felony
C.Capital murder under Section 19.03
D.Aggravated assault, a second-degree felony
Explanation: Section 19.03(a)(1) elevates a murder to capital murder when the person murders a peace officer or fireman who is acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty and the person knows the victim is a peace officer or fireman. Capital murder is a capital felony.
4A defendant steals merchandise from a store. The aggregated value of the property is established at $2,500. Under the theft value ladder in Penal Code Section 31.03(e), what is the offense grade?
A.Class A misdemeanor
B.Third-degree felony
C.Second-degree felony
D.State jail felony
Explanation: Under Section 31.03(e)(4)(A), theft is a state jail felony if the value of the property stolen is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000. A value of exactly $2,500 falls at the bottom of the state jail felony tier.
5What is the punishment range for a first-degree felony in Texas under Penal Code Section 12.32?
A.5 to 99 years or life and a fine up to $10,000
B.2 to 10 years and a fine up to $10,000
C.2 to 20 years and a fine up to $10,000
D.180 days to 2 years in a state jail and a fine up to $10,000
Explanation: Section 12.32 sets the first-degree felony range at imprisonment for life or for any term of not more than 99 years or less than 5 years, plus an optional fine not to exceed $10,000.
6A police officer conducts a custodial interrogation and obtains a written confession. The statement does not show on its face that the accused received the required warnings. Under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.22, what is the result?
A.The statement is admissible if the officer testifies he gave the warnings orally
B.The statement is inadmissible because the warnings and a valid waiver must appear on the face of the written statement
C.The statement is admissible because written statements are exempt from the warning requirement
D.The statement is admissible if the defendant later signed a separate waiver form
Explanation: Article 38.22, Section 2 bars admission of a written statement from custodial interrogation unless the face of the statement shows the accused received the warnings and knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived those rights. Texas courts strictly construe this requirement.
7Which of the following warnings is required by Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.22 but is NOT part of the federal Miranda v. Arizona warnings?
A.The right to remain silent
B.The right to have a lawyer present during questioning
C.The right to terminate the interview at any time
D.The right to an appointed lawyer if the accused cannot afford one
Explanation: Article 38.22's statutory warnings include the right to terminate the interview at any time, a warning that is not among the four warnings federal Miranda requires. The other warnings overlap with Miranda.
8After a timely request from the defendant, the prosecution must, under the Michael Morton Act (Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 39.14), produce which of the following?
A.Only documents the prosecution intends to introduce at trial
B.All offense reports and witness statements, regardless of materiality, on its own motion before indictment
C.Only physical evidence subject to forensic testing
D.Designated documents, papers, written statements, objects, and other tangible things material to any matter in the case that are in the State's possession
Explanation: Article 39.14(a), as amended by the Michael Morton Act, requires the State, after a timely request, to produce and permit inspection of designated documents, papers, written statements, objects, and other tangible things that constitute or contain evidence material to any matter in the action and are in the State's possession, custody, or control.
9A Texas officer conducts a warrantless search that violates the Fourth Amendment and seizes contraband. Under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.23, what must the trial court do with the evidence?
A.Exclude it, because no evidence obtained in violation of law shall be admitted against the accused
B.Admit it if the officer acted in good faith, under the federal Leon doctrine
C.Admit it because Article 38.23 applies only to confessions
D.Admit it because the Texas exclusionary rule reaches only constitutional violations, not statutory ones
Explanation: Article 38.23(a) provides that no evidence obtained by an officer in violation of the U.S. or Texas Constitution or laws shall be admitted against the accused. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has declined to adopt the federal Leon good-faith exception; the only statutory good-faith exception in 38.23(b) is for objective good-faith reliance on a warrant.
10A defendant asserts that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated after a long pretrial delay. Which framework do Texas courts apply to evaluate the claim?
A.The strict deadlines of the Texas Speedy Trial Act in Chapter 32A
B.The four-factor balancing test of Barker v. Wingo
C.A bright-line 180-day rule from arrest to trial
D.The Brady v. Maryland materiality test
Explanation: Texas courts apply the Barker v. Wingo four-factor balancing test (length of delay, reason for the delay, the defendant's assertion of the right, and prejudice). The Texas Speedy Trial Act in Chapter 32A was declared unconstitutional, so no fixed statutory deadline governs.

About the TX Criminal Law Specialist Exam

The Texas Board Certified - Criminal Law examination is administered by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization (TBLS) to attorneys with substantial criminal law experience seeking the Board Certified designation. The full-day exam pairs a three-hour morning session of three essays with a three-hour afternoon session of approximately 100 multiple-choice questions. It tests the Texas Penal Code (culpable mental states, criminal homicide, assault, robbery, and theft), the Code of Criminal Procedure (confessions under Article 38.22, the 38.23 exclusionary rule, and Michael Morton Act discovery under 39.14), constitutional criminal procedure, the Texas Rules of Evidence, trial and punishment, and appeals and post-conviction practice. Certification is valid for five years and must be renewed.

Questions

100 scored questions

Time Limit

Full day: 3-hour morning essay session + 3-hour afternoon multiple-choice session

Passing Score

350 (scaled)

Exam Fee

Confirm on tbls.org (Texas Board of Legal Specialization (TBLS))

TX Criminal Law Specialist Exam Content Outline

20%

Texas Penal Code Substantive Offenses

Culpable mental states (PC 6.03: intentional, knowing, reckless, criminal negligence), default culpability (6.02), offense classification, criminal homicide (Ch. 19 - murder 19.02 first-degree, capital murder 19.03, manslaughter 19.04 second-degree, criminally negligent homicide 19.05 state jail), felony murder, assault (22.01-22.04), robbery (29.02-29.03), theft value ladder (31.03(e)) and aggregation (31.09), inchoate offenses (15.01-15.02), parties (7.02), and justifications (9.31-9.32)

18%

Code of Criminal Procedure

Confession warnings and waiver on the face of a written statement plus electronic-recording requirements for oral custodial statements (Art. 38.22), the Texas exclusionary rule barring evidence obtained in violation of law with only a narrow warrant-based good-faith exception (38.23), Michael Morton Act discovery and the 39.14(h) Brady-type duty, search warrants (Ch. 18), magistration within 48 hours (15.17), indictment/grand jury and Art. 1.14 defect waiver, bail, plea admonishments (26.13), and limitations (Ch. 12)

18%

Constitutional Criminal Procedure

Fourth Amendment search and seizure (Terry stops, Chimel search incident to arrest, the automobile exception, and independent source/inevitable discovery), Fifth Amendment Miranda/Edwards and double jeopardy (Blockburger), Sixth Amendment right to counsel (Massiah) and confrontation (Crawford testimonial hearsay), Brady v. Maryland disclosure, eyewitness identification (Manson v. Brathwaite), and the Barker v. Wingo speedy-trial balancing test (the Texas Speedy Trial Act was held unconstitutional)

16%

Evidence

Texas Rules of Evidence: the hearsay exclusion (802) and exceptions (803 excited utterance/business records; 804 former testimony, statement against interest, dying declaration; 38.072 outcry), relevance and Rule 403 balancing, character and extraneous offenses under 404(b), impeachment by conviction (609), expert reliability under Kelly/Daubert (702), authentication and chain of custody (901), refreshing recollection (612), the accomplice-witness corroboration rule (Art. 38.14), and the corpus delicti rule

16%

Trial & Punishment

Bifurcated felony trial and punishment-phase evidence (Art. 37.07), 12-member felony jury and unanimity (Art. 36.29 disabled-juror rule), voir dire and Batson, the written jury charge on applicable law (36.14), proof beyond a reasonable doubt, punishment ranges (PC Ch. 12: 12.31-12.35), repeat/habitual enhancements (12.42/12.425) and 12.44 reduction, deferred adjudication and community supervision (Ch. 42A), sudden passion (19.02(d)), and capital sentencing (12.31, Roper v. Simmons)

12%

Appeals & Post-Conviction

Motion for new trial within 30 days (TRAP 21.4), notice of appeal (30 days, or 90 days with a timely motion for new trial - TRAP 26.2), limited appeal after a negotiated plea (TRAP 25.2), direct appeal to the courts of appeals with discretionary review (PDR) by the Court of Criminal Appeals, legal sufficiency under Jackson v. Virginia (Brooks), harm analysis under TRAP 44.2(a)/(b), ineffective assistance under Strickland, and habeas corpus (Art. 11.07 felony confinement, 11.071 capital, 11.072 probation)

How to Pass the TX Criminal Law Specialist Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: 350 (scaled)
  • Exam length: 100 questions
  • Time limit: Full day: 3-hour morning essay session + 3-hour afternoon multiple-choice session
  • Exam fee: Confirm on tbls.org

Keys to Passing

  • Complete 500+ practice questions
  • Score 80%+ consistently before scheduling
  • Focus on highest-weighted sections
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

TX Criminal Law Specialist Study Tips from Top Performers

1Memorize the culpable mental states in PC 6.03 cold and be able to distinguish intentional, knowing, reckless, and criminally negligent conduct on a fact pattern. The homicide chapter (murder 19.02, manslaughter 19.04, criminally negligent homicide 19.05) and many MCQ items turn on the mental-state distinction
2Drill the punishment ranges in Chapter 12 until automatic: capital (death or life without parole, 12.31), first degree (5-99 or life, 12.32), second degree (2-20, 12.33), third degree (2-10, 12.34), and state jail (180 days-2 years, 12.35). Tie each offense to its grade, then layer 12.42 habitual enhancement (25-99 or life)
3Know the theft value ladder in 31.03(e) by dollar tier - Class C under $100; Class B $100 to under $750; Class A $750 to under $2,500; state jail $2,500 to under $30,000; third degree $30,000 to under $150,000; second degree $150,000 to under $300,000; first degree $300,000 or more - and the 31.09 aggregation rule for a single scheme
4Master the Texas-specific procedure that diverges from federal practice: the Article 38.22 warning (including the right to terminate the interview), the 38.23 exclusionary rule with its warrant-only good-faith exception (Texas rejected Leon), the Article 38.14 accomplice-witness corroboration rule, and that the Texas Speedy Trial Act was struck down so Barker v. Wingo governs
5Practice the Michael Morton Act (39.14) and the 39.14(h) affirmative disclosure duty alongside federal Brady. Many essays test a discovery or disclosure violation, so be ready to analyze materiality and the remedy
6For the appeals module, lock in the deadlines: motion for new trial within 30 days (TRAP 21.4), notice of appeal within 30 days or 90 days with a timely motion for new trial (TRAP 26.2), Jackson v. Virginia sufficiency review, and the TRAP 44.2(a)/(b) split between constitutional and non-constitutional harm

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it take to become Texas Board Certified in Criminal Law?

You must hold an active Texas law license, have at least 5 years in the practice of law, devote at least 25% of your practice to criminal law in Texas during the 3 years preceding application, meet the lead-counsel case requirements (a required number and combination of felony, misdemeanor, federal, and appellate matters), complete at least 60 hours of TBLS-approved criminal law CLE, provide at least 5 references (4 from attorneys you tried a case with or against and 1 Texas judge you appeared before), and pass the TBLS Criminal Law examination. Certification lasts 5 years and must be renewed.

How is the TBLS Criminal Law specialist exam structured?

The exam is a full day. The morning is a three-hour session of three essay questions, and the afternoon is a three-hour session of approximately 100 multiple-choice questions. The passing standard is a 350 scaled score. The exam tests the Texas Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure, constitutional criminal procedure, the Texas Rules of Evidence, trial and punishment, and appeals and post-conviction practice.

What are the four culpable mental states under Texas Penal Code 6.03?

Texas Penal Code Section 6.03 defines four culpable mental states. A person acts intentionally when it is his conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result. He acts knowingly when he is aware his conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result. He acts recklessly when he is aware of but consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk. He acts with criminal negligence when he ought to be aware of, but fails to perceive, a substantial and unjustifiable risk, where the failure is a gross deviation from the ordinary standard of care.

What warnings does Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.22 require?

Before a custodial statement is admissible, the accused must be warned that he has the right to remain silent and that any statement may be used against him, the right to a lawyer present before and during questioning, the right to appointed counsel if he cannot afford one, and the right to terminate the interview at any time. The right to terminate the interview is a distinctly Texas warning not required by federal Miranda. A written statement must show these warnings and a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver on its face, and an oral custodial statement generally must be electronically recorded.

What is the Michael Morton Act and what does Article 39.14 require?

The Michael Morton Act, codified at Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 39.14, broadened criminal discovery after Michael Morton's wrongful conviction. After a timely defense request, the State must produce and permit inspection of documents, written statements, objects, and other tangible things material to any matter in the case that are in the State's possession. Separately, Article 39.14(h) imposes an affirmative, request-independent duty to disclose exculpatory, impeachment, or mitigating evidence as soon as practicable, codifying a Brady-type obligation.

How does the Texas exclusionary rule in Article 38.23 differ from federal law?

Article 38.23(a) provides that no evidence obtained by an officer in violation of the U.S. or Texas Constitution or laws may be admitted against the accused, reaching both constitutional and statutory violations. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has declined to adopt the broad federal Leon good-faith exception. The only statutory good-faith exception, in 38.23(b), is narrow: it applies when an officer acts in objective good-faith reliance on a warrant issued by a neutral magistrate based on probable cause.