PracticeVideosBlogFlashcardsEspañol
All Practice Exams

Free Practice Questions for Korea Police Lieutenant Recruit

Exam-style questions and explanations by OpenExamPrep.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card
100+ Questions
100% Free

Loading practice questions...

Same family resources

Explore More South Korea Police and Coast Guard Examinations (경찰청·해양경찰청·경찰대학)

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.

Korea Coast Guard Lieutenant Open Recruitment Exam (해양경찰 경위 공개경쟁채용시험, South Korea)

Practice Questions

Korea Coast Guard Officer Recruitment Exam (해양경찰 순경 공채, South Korea)

Practice Questions

Korea National Police University Cadet Entrance Exam (경찰대학 신입생 모집 1차 시험, South Korea)

Practice Questions
Exam Review

Key Facts: Korea Police Lieutenant Recruit Exam

200 questions

Official Stage 1 written MCQ count (five subjects × 40 items)

https://www.police.ac.kr/police/police/html/cadet/examway.do

400 points

General-track written scoring scale (형사법 120, 헌법 60, 경찰학 120, 범죄학 60, elective 40)

https://www.police.ac.kr/police/police/html/cadet/examway.do

KRW 7,000

Application fee under Police Officials Appointment Decree Art. 44

https://www.law.go.kr

1 year

Mandatory cadet training period at the Korean National Police University

https://www.police.ac.kr

경찰 경위 공채 is the National Police Agency / KNPU open recruitment examination for Police Lieutenants. The official written test is five MCQ subjects of 40 items each (200 items, 400-point general-track scale). Application fee is KRW 7,000 under Police Officials Appointment Decree Art. 44. This OpenExamPrep resource provides 100 independent English MCQ study questions covering Criminal Law, Constitutional Law, Police Science, and Criminology.

Sample Korea Police Lieutenant Recruit Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to review concepts for the Korea Police Lieutenant Recruit exam. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1In Korean criminal jurisprudence, which of the following scenarios violates the principle of legality (죄형법정주의), specifically the prohibition of adverse analogy (유추해석금지의 원칙)?
A.Applying a statutory mitigation clause for voluntary surrender by analogy to an unlisted but functionally equivalent act of cooperation
B.Expanding the statutory definition of 'dangerous weapon' in aggravated bodily injury to encompass an ordinary digital smartphone transmitting radio signals
C.Interpreting an ambiguous penal provision in favor of the accused in accordance with the principle of in dubio pro reo
D.Applying a lighter amended penal provision enacted subsequent to the criminal act under Article 1, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Act
Explanation: Under the principle of legality (죄형법정주의), interpreting criminal statutes beyond their clear statutory meaning to the disadvantage of the defendant constitutes an unconstitutional adverse analogy (유추해석금지). Analogizing a smartphone transmitting radio waves to a dangerous weapon (위험한 물건) impermissibly expands penal liability. Favorable analogy and applying lighter retroactive laws are constitutionally permissible.
2Under Article 1 of the Korean Criminal Act (형법 제1조), which rule governs the temporal application of criminal law when a statutory amendment abolishes the criminality of an act after its commission?
A.The law in effect at the time of commission always governs without exception under the principle of non-retroactivity
B.If the criminal act no longer constitutes a crime under the new statute, the subsequent law shall apply, barring punishment
C.The court has absolute administrative discretion to choose between the old and new statutes regardless of legal changes
D.The offender must still be sentenced under the old statute, but the president must issue an immediate individual pardon
Explanation: Under Article 1, Paragraph 2 of the Korean Criminal Act, when a statute is amended after the commission of an act such that the conduct no longer constitutes a crime, or the statutory penalty is reduced, the new law applies. This provides a retroactive favorability exception to the general lex loci delicti rule of Paragraph 1.
3In Korean criminal law, which of the following elements is required to establish criminal liability for an improper crime of omission (부진정부작위범) such as homicide by omission (부작위에 의한 살인)?
A.The statutory text must exclusively and explicitly define the offense solely in passive omission terminology
B.The perpetrator must possess a legal duty to act (guarantor duty, 보증인지위) and the omission must be functionally equivalent to commission by affirmative act (동가치성)
C.The perpetrator must have caused the dangerous condition through prior unlawful intent (dolus directus) in every instance
D.The legal duty to act can only arise from written statutory enactments and never from contract, voluntary assumption, or prior acts
Explanation: An improper crime of omission (부진정부작위범) occurs when an offense formally defined as an affirmative act is committed through failure to act. Criminal liability requires both a guarantor status/duty (보증인지위 및 보증인의무) grounded in law, contract, or prior conduct, and functional equivalence (동가치성) between the omission and affirmative action.
4Which legal doctrine does the Supreme Court of Korea (대법원) primarily apply to determine causation (인과관계) between a defendant's act and the resulting criminal harm?
A.The adequate causation theory (상당인과관계설), examining whether the act substantially increased the objective likelihood of the result according to ordinary life experience
B.The absolute conditional theory (조건설), where any factor without which the result would not have occurred imposes full penal liability
C.The proximate cause doctrine of Anglo-American common law based solely on temporal proximity
D.The subjective guilt theory, which finds causation whenever the perpetrator possessed evil motives regardless of physical trajectory
Explanation: Korean Supreme Court jurisprudence consistently adheres to the adequate causation theory (상당인과관계설) in determining criminal liability under Article 17 of the Criminal Act. Causation is affirmed when the act creates an objective and substantial likelihood of bringing about the harmful result according to empirical norms and general human experience.
5What is the defining legal boundary between willful negligence / dolus eventualis (미필적 고의) and conscious negligence (인식 있는 과실) in Korean criminal jurisprudence?
A.Whether the actor foresaw the possibility of the harmful result occurring
B.Whether the actor possessed a positive emotional desire for the harmful consequence to occur
C.Whether the actor accepted or reconciled themselves to the occurrence of the result (용인 / 인용), rather than genuinely trusting that it would not happen
D.Whether the statutory offense is categorized as an infraction or a major felony
Explanation: Both dolus eventualis (미필적 고의) and conscious negligence (인식 있는 과실) involve cognitive awareness of the possibility of harm. The decisive distinguishing element under Korean precedent is the volitional component: in dolus eventualis, the actor accepts or approves the consequence if it occurs (인용/용인설), whereas in conscious negligence, the actor carelessly trusts that the harm will not materialize.
6Defendant aims a firearm intending to shoot victim A, but due to poor marksmanship, the bullet misses A and strikes and kills bystander B. Under the statutory conformity theory (법정적 부합설) adopted by the Korean Supreme Court, how is the defendant held criminally liable?
A.Attempted murder of A and negligent homicide of B in concurrent crimes (경합범)
B.Consummated murder of B (살인죄의 기수), because the intent to kill a human being materialized in the death of a human being within the same statutory offense
C.Exoneration from murder due to complete mistake of fact (사실의 착오), punishable only for negligent firearm discharge
D.Aggravated intentional homicide of both A and B under double jeopardy principles
Explanation: Under the statutory conformity theory (법정적 부합설), which represents the dominant Korean Supreme Court precedent, an aberrationis ictus (타격의 착오) between objects of equal statutory value results in intentional consummation. Because A and B both fall under the statutory protection of human life under Article 250(1), the intent to kill transfers, establishing completed murder regarding B.
7Under Article 21 of the Korean Criminal Act, which of the following is an indispensable requirement for an act to be justified as legitimate self-defense (정당방위)?
A.The unlawful infringement against the legal interest of oneself or another must be present or imminent (현재의 위난/부당한 침해)
B.The defensive action must involve state law enforcement officers acting in a designated emergency
C.The defender must have exhausted all available retreat avenues before offering any resistance
D.The harm inflicted on the aggressor must always be strictly lesser than the legal interest defended
Explanation: Article 21, Paragraph 1 of the Korean Criminal Act requires that self-defense be directed against a present, unlawful infringement (현재의 부당한 침해) of one's own or another person's legal interest. Defending against past or future potential threats does not qualify for justification. Korean law does not impose a duty to retreat in self-defense, and equal balance of legal interests is not strictly required unlike in necessity.
8Under Article 22 of the Korean Criminal Act (긴급피난), how does the defense of necessity differ fundamentally from self-defense (정당방위)?
A.Necessity may be directed against an innocent third party's legal interests to avoid an imminent danger, whereas self-defense is exclusively directed against an unlawful aggressor
B.Self-defense requires a balancing of competing legal interests, while necessity permits any degree of force
C.Necessity cannot be invoked if the imminent danger was caused by natural forces such as floods or earthquakes
D.Self-defense excuses culpability but does not justify the act, whereas necessity completely eliminates illegality
Explanation: Self-defense (정당방위) represents 'right versus wrong' and must be directed solely against an unlawful attacker. In contrast, necessity (긴급피난) involves 'right versus right' where a person averts an imminent danger by sacrificing the legitimate interests of an innocent third party, which demands a strict proportionality and balancing of interests (법익균형성).
9Under Article 20 of the Korean Criminal Act (정당행위), which criterion is NOT part of the Supreme Court's five-factor test to determine whether an act is justified as socially acceptable (사회상규에 위배되지 아니하는 행위)?
A.Legitimacy of the motive or purpose (동기나 목적의 정당성)
B.Reasonable balance between the protected and infringed legal interests (법익의 균형성)
C.Unconditional prior authorization by a public prosecutor (검사의 사전 서면 승인)
D.Complementarity, meaning no other lighter means or remedies were available (보충성)
Explanation: The Korean Supreme Court established a five-prong test for acts not violating social norms under Article 20: (1) legitimacy of purpose/motive, (2) reasonableness of means/methods, (3) balance of legal interests, (4) urgency, and (5) complementarity (보충성). Prior prosecutorial approval is not a legal requirement for socially acceptable justifiable acts.
10A defendant voluntarily consumes large quantities of alcohol with the premeditated intent to murder a rival while in an intoxicated state of diminished capacity. Under Article 10, Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Act (원인에 있어서 자유로운 행위), how does the court treat the defendant's mental state?
A.The defendant must receive a mandatory reduction in sentence due to diminished mental capacity at the exact moment of killing
B.The provisions on reduced responsibility or non-punishability do not apply, and the defendant is punished as having full criminal culpability
C.The defendant is completely acquitted because mens rea must coincide simultaneously with actus reus at the scene
D.The defendant can only be convicted of negligent homicide because intoxication destroys premeditation
Explanation: Article 10, Paragraph 3 of the Korean Criminal Act codifies the doctrine of actio libera in causa (원인에 있어서 자유로운 행위). It provides that the mitigation rules for mental illness or diminished capacity under Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to an act committed by a person who foresaw the occurrence of danger and intentionally or negligently induced mental disorder.

About the Korea Police Lieutenant Recruit Exam

The Korea National Police Lieutenant Open Recruitment Exam (경찰 경위 공개경쟁채용시험, formerly known as the Police Officer Cadet Selection Exam / 경찰간부후보생) is the premier open competition for aspiring executive officers in South Korea's police force. Administered by the National Police University, it tests advanced legal principles, constitutional due process, police administrative law, and modern criminology.

Exam sponsor: Korea National Police Agency (경찰청) / Korean National Police University (경찰대학). The requirements and fees below concern the certification or admission exam, separate from our free practice resources.

Assessment

Five-stage officer recruitment on the KNPU examway: Stage 1 written MCQ (five subjects; English and Korean History via certification); Stage 2 physical examination; Stage 3 aptitude testing; Stage 4 physical fitness (50 m sprint, shuttle run, push-ups, sit-ups, grip strength); Stage 5 interview. Successful candidates complete cadet training at the National Police University before appointment as Lieutenant (경위).

Time Limit

Official written-session durations are published in each KNPU annual notice; later stages are scheduled separately

Passing Score

Minimum 40% per subject on the written paper and competitive ranking on the 400-point general-track scale; final appointment after physical, aptitude, fitness, interview, and cadet training

Exam / Certification Fees

KRW 7,000 (Police Officials Appointment Decree Art. 44 응시수수료)

Exam sponsor website

Fees, eligibility, and exam policies can change. Confirm them with the exam sponsor before applying or paying.

Our practice resources: topics covered

We aim to reflect publicly available exam outlines and topic information in our study resources. Coverage, format, and difficulty may differ from the actual exam, and we cannot guarantee that every detail is accurate or current. Confirm exam requirements, fees, and policies with the official exam sponsor.

30% of bank (30 questions)

Criminal Law & Procedure (형사법)

Substantive criminal liability, justification defenses, criminal procedure, search and seizure, and evidentiary rules.

25% of bank (25 questions)

Korean Constitutional Law (대한민국 헌법)

Due process, search warrant clauses, fundamental rights restrictions, and institutional police accountability.

25% of bank (25 questions)

Police Science & Administration (경찰학)

Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers, police administrative law, public safety management, and community policing.

20% of bank (20 questions)

Criminology (범죄학)

Classical and modern criminological theories, sociological crime models, victimology, and crime prevention strategies.

Preparing for the Korea Police Lieutenant Recruit Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: Minimum 40% per subject on the written paper and competitive ranking on the 400-point general-track scale; final appointment after physical, aptitude, fitness, interview, and cadet training
  • Assessment: Five-stage officer recruitment on the KNPU examway: Stage 1 written MCQ (five subjects; English and Korean History via certification); Stage 2 physical examination; Stage 3 aptitude testing; Stage 4 physical fitness (50 m sprint, shuttle run, push-ups, sit-ups, grip strength); Stage 5 interview. Successful candidates complete cadet training at the National Police University before appointment as Lieutenant (경위).
  • Time limit: Official written-session durations are published in each KNPU annual notice; later stages are scheduled separately
  • Exam / certification fees: KRW 7,000 (Police Officials Appointment Decree Art. 44 응시수수료) Official sources

Using Our Practice Resources

  • Work through all 100 available questions
  • Review every answer and explanation
  • Track weak areas and revisit them
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

Korea Police Lieutenant Recruit: Suggested Study Strategy

1Thoroughly memorize provisions and case law interpreting the Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers (경찰관직무집행법).
2Pay special attention to Constitutional Court precedents regarding bodily freedom, wiretapping, and compulsory investigations.
3Understand the theoretical divergences among differential association, strain theory, and social control theories in Criminology.
4Maintain strict physical conditioning alongside academic studies, as physical fitness scoring directly impacts candidate ranking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What rank do successful candidates receive upon completing training?

Graduates of the 1-year officer cadet training course at the Korean National Police University are commissioned directly as Police Lieutenants (경위), the primary field executive rank.

Is this the same exam as the patrol officer exam (순경 공채)?

No. The patrol officer exam (korea-police-exam) recruits entry-level officers at the Sungyeong rank. The Lieutenant exam is an executive officer competition with an expanded legal curriculum including Criminology and higher passing thresholds.

What is the application fee?

The application fee is KRW 7,000 under Article 44 of the Police Officials Appointment Decree (경찰공무원 임용령). From the 제76기 cycle, KNPU directs application through the national civil-service system (gongmuwon.gosi.kr); confirm the live sitting notice.