PracticeVideosBlogFlashcardsEspañol
All Practice Exams

100+ Free Bocconi Law Test Practice Questions

Prepare for the Online Bocconi Test - Law (Integrated Master of Arts in Law & Global Law) exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
100+ Questions
100% Free

Loading practice questions...

Same family resources

Explore More International University Entrance Tests

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.

Bocconi Admission Test (Italy)

Practice Questions

Luiss Admission Test for Master's Degree Courses (Italy)

Practice Questions

Online Bocconi Test - International Graduate Applicants (Italy)

Practice Questions

Online Bocconi Test for Specialized Master Programs (Italy)

Practice Questions
2026 Statistics

Key Facts: Bocconi Law Test Exam

50 questions

Items on the official test

Bocconi University

75 minutes

Total test duration

Bocconi University

18 of 50

Logics and critical thinking items

Bocconi University

€60

Fee per test attempt

Bocconi University

17 / 50

Minimum total score to be considered

Bocconi University

55%

Weight of the test in the admission evaluation

Bocconi University

4 attempts

Maximum per test type per academic year

Bocconi University

The Online Bocconi Test - Law is a 75-minute, 50-question online proctored admission test for Bocconi's Law and Global Law programs. Wrong answers are penalised (-0.2, or -0.33 on three-option critical-thinking items), unanswered questions score zero, and a total below 17/50 disqualifies the application.

Sample Bocconi Law Test Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your Bocconi Law Test exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1All legal scholars are analytical thinkers. Some analytical thinkers are certified arbitrators. Which of the following conclusions CANNOT be logically deduced from these statements alone?
A.Some legal scholars might be certified arbitrators.
B.All certified arbitrators are legal scholars.
C.It is logically possible that no certified arbitrator is a legal scholar.
D.Some analytical thinkers are legal scholars.
Explanation: The premises establish that the set of legal scholars is entirely contained within analytical thinkers, and there is an overlap between analytical thinkers and certified arbitrators. However, this does not require all arbitrators to be legal scholars; arbitrators could be analytical thinkers who are not legal scholars. Therefore, the assertion that all certified arbitrators are legal scholars cannot be logically deduced.
2If a contract contains an explicit arbitration clause, any dispute arising under it must be submitted to arbitration. Contract X contains an explicit arbitration clause. A dispute has arisen under Contract X. What logical conclusion must follow?
A.The dispute must be submitted to arbitration.
B.The dispute must be adjudicated in a court of general jurisdiction.
C.Contract X is automatically voidable by either party.
D.Arbitration can only be invoked if both parties sign a post-dispute agreement.
Explanation: This follows a standard Modus Ponens structure: If P (arbitration clause present and dispute arises), then Q (dispute must be arbitrated). Since P is given as true, Q necessarily follows.
3If a corporate officer breaches their fiduciary duty, the board of directors is legally obligated to initiate an internal audit. The board of directors was not legally obligated to initiate an internal audit. What can be validly inferred?
A.The corporate officer conducted an external audit instead.
B.The board of directors breached its fiduciary duty.
C.The corporate officer did not breach their fiduciary duty.
D.The internal audit was completed ahead of schedule.
Explanation: This argument applies Modus Tollens (If P then Q; Not Q; therefore Not P). Since the obligation to audit (Q) did not arise, the condition triggering it—the breach of fiduciary duty (P)—did not occur.
4Passing the bar examination is a necessary condition for practicing law as a licensed attorney. Which of the following statements is logically equivalent to this rule?
A.Everyone who passes the bar examination is licensed to practice law.
B.If someone practices law as a licensed attorney, they have not passed the bar examination.
C.Passing the bar examination guarantees immediate admission to the judicial bench.
D.If a person has not passed the bar examination, they cannot practice law as a licensed attorney.
Explanation: A necessary condition N for outcome O means that without N, O cannot occur (If not N, then not O). Thus, failing to pass the bar exam means one cannot practice law as a licensed attorney.
5Signing a written release agreement is sufficient to discharge all pending tort claims between the parties. Which statement must be true based on this rule?
A.Pending tort claims can only be discharged by signing a written release agreement.
B.If the parties sign a written release agreement, their pending tort claims are discharged.
C.Signing a written release agreement discharges contractual claims as well as tort claims.
D.If tort claims are discharged, a written release agreement was signed.
Explanation: A sufficient condition S guarantees outcome O (If S, then O). Therefore, signing the release agreement guarantees the discharge of pending tort claims.
6Consider the following argument: 'Recent data shows that countries with strict environmental disclosure requirements attract higher levels of sustainable foreign direct investment. Furthermore, corporate transparency reduces capital costs. Therefore, implementing mandatory ESG reporting will boost national economic competitiveness.' What is the primary conclusion of the argument?
A.Implementing mandatory ESG reporting will boost national economic competitiveness.
B.Corporate transparency reduces capital costs.
C.Countries with strict disclosure rules attract more sustainable investment.
D.Foreign direct investment is decreasing globally.
Explanation: The primary conclusion is the central claim supported by the premises, signaled by the indicator word 'Therefore.' The premises regarding foreign investment and capital costs support this ultimate prediction.
7An analyst argues: 'The new data privacy regulation should be repealed because compliance costs have reduced profit margins for small software startups.' Which unstated assumption underpins this argument?
A.Large technology firms do not incur compliance costs under the new regulation.
B.Small software startups generate the majority of national tax revenue.
C.Regulations that reduce profit margins for small software startups should not be maintained.
D.Data privacy is less important than consumer cybersecurity.
Explanation: The argument moves from a premise (costs reduce startup profit margins) to a recommendation (repeal the regulation). For this conclusion to hold, the author must assume that harm to startup profit margins is a sufficient ground for repeal.
8'We should reject Professor Vance’s proposed reform of administrative procedure rules. After all, Vance was once censured for a minor ethics violation twenty years ago.' Which logical fallacy is committed in this passage?
A.Straw man
B.Slippery slope
C.False analogy
D.Ad hominem
Explanation: An ad hominem fallacy occurs when an argument attacks the personal character or past conduct of the proponent rather than addressing the substance of the proposal.
9'Immediately after the city installed automated traffic speed cameras, local retail sales fell by 4%. Therefore, speed cameras caused the decline in retail sales.' Which logical fallacy is illustrated here?
A.Appeal to authority
B.Post hoc ergo propter hoc (False cause)
C.Circular reasoning
D.Equivocation
Explanation: The post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy assumes that because Event B occurred after Event A, Event A must have caused Event B, ignoring temporal coincidence or alternative contributing factors.
10Premise 1: All torts are civil wrongs. Premise 2: No breach of contract is a tort. Which of the following statements MUST be true based on these premises?
A.Some civil wrongs are not breaches of contract.
B.All civil wrongs are torts.
C.No breach of contract is a civil wrong.
D.Every civil wrong is either a tort or a breach of contract.
Explanation: Since all torts are civil wrongs, there exists a subset of civil wrongs that are torts. Because no breach of contract is a tort, those civil wrongs that are torts cannot be breaches of contract. Hence, some civil wrongs are not breaches of contract.

About the Bocconi Law Test Exam

The Online Bocconi Test - Law is the selection test used by Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi for its Law School programs (the five-year integrated Master of Arts in Law and the Bachelor in Global Law). It is an online proctored exam of 50 multiple-choice questions in 75 minutes, split into logics and critical thinking (18 items), reading comprehension (11), verbal reasoning (10), numerical reasoning (6) and mathematics (5). Candidates choose Italian or English for the test regardless of the language of the program they apply to; this free practice bank is an English-language study adaptation, not an official Bocconi test or simulation.

Assessment

50 multiple-choice questions delivered in a single 75-minute online proctored session, mixed by topic and difficulty: 18 logics and critical thinking, 11 reading comprehension, 10 verbal reasoning, 6 numerical reasoning, 5 mathematics.

Time Limit

75 minutes

Passing Score

+1 correct, 0 unanswered, -0.2 wrong (-0.33 on three-option critical-thinking items). Applicants scoring below 17 out of 50 are excluded from the selection; there is no fixed pass mark above that, because admission is by competitive ranking.

Exam Fee

€60 per test attempt (Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi)

Bocconi Law Test Exam Content Outline

36%

Logics and Critical Thinking

Deductive reasoning, syllogisms, argument evaluation, assumptions, and logical fallacies

22%

Reading Comprehension

Analyzing passages, explicit and implicit inference, author purpose, tone, and text structure

20%

Verbal Reasoning

Vocabulary, analogies, sentence completion, antonyms/synonyms, and logical concept connections

12%

Numerical Reasoning

Chart and table interpretation, percentages, ratios, data trends, and data relevance

10%

Mathematics

Basic algebra, linear equations, plane geometry, probability, and sets

How to Pass the Bocconi Law Test Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: +1 correct, 0 unanswered, -0.2 wrong (-0.33 on three-option critical-thinking items). Applicants scoring below 17 out of 50 are excluded from the selection; there is no fixed pass mark above that, because admission is by competitive ranking.
  • Assessment: 50 multiple-choice questions delivered in a single 75-minute online proctored session, mixed by topic and difficulty: 18 logics and critical thinking, 11 reading comprehension, 10 verbal reasoning, 6 numerical reasoning, 5 mathematics.
  • Time limit: 75 minutes
  • Exam fee: €60 per test attempt

Keys to Passing

  • Work through all 100 available questions
  • Review every answer and explanation
  • Track weak areas and revisit them
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

Bocconi Law Test Study Tips from Top Performers

1Logics and critical thinking is 18 of 50 items - the single largest block - so drill data-proposition items and deductive-condition puzzles first
2Budget roughly 90 seconds per item; the questions are mixed by topic and difficulty, so practise switching between passage reading and calculation without losing pace
3Do not guess blindly: a wrong answer costs -0.2 (or -0.33 on three-option items) while leaving it blank costs nothing
4Law-track reading passages are humanistic (pedagogy, history, philosophy, geography), unlike the economics passages in the general Bocconi test
5Mathematics is only 5 items and is limited to plane and analytic geometry, sets, real-number ordering, percentages and unit conversions

Frequently Asked Questions

How many questions are on the Online Bocconi Test - Law?

50 multiple-choice questions in 75 minutes: 18 logics and critical thinking, 11 reading comprehension, 10 verbal reasoning, 6 numerical reasoning and 5 mathematics.

Is there negative marking on the Bocconi Law Test?

Yes. A correct answer scores +1, an unanswered question scores 0, and a wrong answer costs -0.2 points, rising to -0.33 on critical-thinking items that offer only three answer options.

What score do I need on the Bocconi Law Test?

Bocconi publishes one hard floor: applicants whose total score (penalties included) is below 17 out of 50 are not considered. Above that, admission is competitive - the test counts for 55% of the evaluation and secondary-school GPA for the other 45%.

Can I take the Bocconi Law Test in English?

Yes. When purchasing a test attempt you choose Italian or English, and the choice is independent of the teaching language of the degree program you apply to.

Are these practice questions the official Bocconi test?

No. This is a free English-language multiple-choice study bank built from Bocconi's published subject areas. Bocconi publishes its own official simulation, and there are no official Bocconi preparation textbooks.