100+ Free Dominican Public Defender Competition Practice Questions

Prepare for the Concurso para Aspirantes a Defensores Públicos 2024 exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately

100+ Questions

100% Free

Loading practice questions...

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: Dominican Public Defender Competition Exam

80 / 100

Overall Minimum Passing Score

ONDP Competition Bases

40 Points

Written Legal Examination

ONDP Competition Bases

6 Areas

Official Written Blueprint Areas

ONDP Written Assessment Bases

3 Hours

Written Assessment Time Limit

ONDP Competition Bases

12 Months

ENJ Aspirant Training Program

Ley 277-04 & ENJ Regulations

This is an independent English-language MCQ study adaptation covering the six official subject areas of the Dominican Public Defender competition: General Theory of Law, Constitutional Law, International Human Rights, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, and Juvenile Criminal Law. It is not an official translation or format simulation and cannot replace case analysis, oral defense, psychometric, or clinical practice preparation.

Sample Dominican Public Defender Competition Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your Dominican Public Defender Competition exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1In the Dominican legal hierarchy under Article 6 of the Constitution, what is the legal effect of a statutory norm, decree, or administrative act that directly conflicts with the Constitution?

A.It is null and void by operation of law (nulo de pleno derecho)

B.It remains legally effective until the Tribunal Constitucional enters a general invalidation judgment

C.It is merely voidable from the date an ordinary court first declines to apply it

D.It becomes unenforceable only between parties who timely raise a constitutional objection

Explanation: Article 6 of the Dominican Constitution subjects all persons and state organs to the Constitution. Laws, decrees, resolutions, regulations, and acts contrary to it are null and void by operation of law (nulos de pleno derecho).

2Under Article 110 of the Dominican Constitution, when may a newly enacted law be applied retroactively?

A.Whenever a later statute declares itself retroactive, even if it aggravates the accused person's position

B.Only when the new law is favorable to a person sub judice or serving a sentence

C.Whenever the amendment changes procedure, even if applying it would effectively increase punishment

D.Only when the conviction is not yet final; a person already serving sentence cannot invoke the more favorable law

Explanation: Article 110 establishes the general rule that laws govern the future and are not retroactive. It creates a mandatory exception when the new criminal rule favors a person who is sub judice or currently serving a sentence (favor rei / lex mitior).

3What is the primary conceptual distinction between the tacit repeal (derogación tácita) of a statute and its constitutional invalidation (invalidez constitucional)?

A.Repeal and invalidation are equivalent because both necessarily erase the norm retroactively from enactment

B.Repeal arises from a hierarchy defect, whereas constitutional invalidation reflects a later legislature's policy choice

C.Repeal stems from normative succession by a posterior statute, whereas invalidation arises from a structural hierarchy defect

D.Repeal always requires a judicial declaration, whereas invalidation always occurs automatically without adjudication

Explanation: Tacit repeal is a temporal-succession mechanism in which a newer statute of equal or higher rank regulates the same subject inconsistently with an earlier statute (lex posterior derogat priori). Constitutional invalidation instead arises from a hierarchy defect under the supremacy clause.

4In general legal theory and Dominican criminal doctrine, how is the use of analogy (analogía) governed in substantive criminal law?

A.Analogy is barred even when it favors the accused or concerns a non-penal gap

B.Analogy may extend liability if the uncovered conduct is as harmful as the conduct expressly criminalized

C.Analogy may create an aggravating circumstance when the statutory list appears incomplete

D.Analogy in malam partem is strictly prohibited by the legality principle, though analogy in bonam partem may be admissible

Explanation: Strict legality (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege stricta) bars analogy that creates offenses, increases penalties, or otherwise worsens the accused's position. Analogy favorable to the accused (in bonam partem) may be accepted for exculpatory or mitigating circumstances.

5In the general theory of law, how is a subjective right (derecho subjetivo) conceptually defined?

A.A legally recognized faculty or power allowing an individual to act or demand specific conduct from another

B.The objective body of generally applicable legal norms governing the community

C.Any personal interest that a claimant sincerely values, even when the legal order supplies no entitlement

D.A competence assigned to a public organ, which is identical to every private subjective right

Explanation: A subjective right is an individual faculty, power, or authorization conferred by objective law (derecho objetivo) on a legal subject. It entitles that subject to act or to demand specific performance or forbearance from another.

6How does Article 23 of Law 74-25 classify offenses under the current Dominican Penal Code?

A.As crimes, misdemeanors, and contraventions under the classifications of the former code

B.As very serious, serious, and minor offenses according to the personal and social harm involved

C.As public, public dependent on private instance, and private according to the prosecution mechanism

D.As imprisonable, fine-only, and non-punishable according solely to the sanction type

Explanation: Article 23 of Law 74-25 classifies Penal Code offenses as infracciones muy graves, graves, and leves. The classification turns on the degree of personal, material, and social harm caused by the punishable act or omission.

7Which hermeneutic method interprets a statutory provision by examining the underlying purpose, objective, and social rationale intended by the rule (ratio legis)?

A.Grammatical or literal interpretation

B.Historical or drafting-record interpretation

C.Teleological interpretation

D.Authentic legislative interpretation

Explanation: Teleological interpretation searches for the end, objective, and practical purpose of the norm (ratio legis). It seeks an application that gives effect to the values and social outcomes pursued by the legal order.

8In general legal theory, what distinguishes the formal validity (validez) of a legal norm from its social efficacy (eficacia)?

A.Validity concerns actual obedience to the norm, while efficacy concerns whether the competent authority enacted it

B.Validity and efficacy are equivalent whenever a norm has been officially published

C.Validity concerns moral acceptance by the public, while efficacy concerns judicial agreement with the norm

D.Validity concerns legitimate enactment following proper authority and procedures, while efficacy concerns actual compliance

Explanation: A norm has validity when a competent organ creates it through the required constitutional procedures and consistently with higher-ranking norms. Efficacy is the separate sociological question whether citizens actually obey it and authorities apply it.

9Under Article 150 of Law 97-25, what is the ordinary maximum duration of a criminal proceeding and when does the period begin?

A.Four years, counted from a coercive-measure request, citation as an accused person, advance taking of evidence, or freezing of funds

B.Three years, counted only from the formal filing of the prosecution's indictment

C.Five years, counted from arrest in every case whether or not complex-proceeding rules apply

D.There is no overall limit if the accused has never been placed in pre-trial detention

Explanation: Article 150 of Law 97-25 sets an ordinary four-year maximum measured from any of four initial procedural acts: a request for a coercive measure, citation as an accused person, advance taking of evidence, or immobilization of funds. A conviction permits a separate twelve-month extension for processing appeals, and authorized complex matters follow Article 377's special five-year period.

10When an antinomy arises between a prior special statutory rule and a subsequent general statutory rule of identical legislative hierarchy, which principle generally resolves the conflict?

A.The subsequent general law always extinguishes the prior special law without exception

B.The specialty principle dictates that the special law prevails over the general law (lex specialis derogat legi generali)

C.The earlier law is automatically voided under the principle of hierarchical superiority

D.The later general law prevails under chronology unless a court first declares the earlier special law unconstitutional

Explanation: Under the specialty rule (lex specialis derogat legi generali), a statute tailored to a specific category or subject ordinarily governs over a general enactment. A later general statute displaces that special regime only when it manifests an unequivocal intent to repeal or absorb it.

About the Dominican Public Defender Competition Exam

The Concurso para Aspirantes a Defensores Públicos 2024 is the ONDP's public merit-and-opposition selection process for entry into the Dominican Public Defender Career, followed by mandatory initial training delivered by the Escuela Nacional de la Judicatura under Ley 277-04.

Assessment

Documentary and academic merit review (5 points); psychometric assessment (eliminatory, unweighted); behavioral-competencies interview (20 points); written examination featuring eight drawn legal topics and a case analysis over 3 hours (40 points); and an oral examination before the examining board, with 15 minutes of preparation and up to 1 hour 36 minutes of presentation (35 points). The overall minimum passing score is 80/100. Successful aspirants enter a 12-month initial training program administered by the Escuela Nacional de la Judicatura (ENJ) before career appointment.

Time Limit

3 hours for the written assessment; 15 minutes of preparation plus up to 1 hour 36 minutes for the oral assessment

Passing Score

80/100 overall minimum (5 points academic merits, 20 points behavioral interview, 40 points written assessment, 35 points oral examination, and satisfactory eliminatory psychometric evaluation)

Exam Fee

RD$1,000 non-refundable cash application payment (Oficina Nacional de Defensa Pública (ONDP) as the competition authority, with subsequent aspirant training delivered by the Escuela Nacional de la Judicatura (ENJ))

Dominican Public Defender Competition Exam Content Outline

3/40 written-assessment points

Teoría General del Derecho

General legal theory, sources of law, normative hierarchy, statutory interpretation, subjective rights, validity, and retroactivity principles.

5/40 written-assessment points

Derecho Constitucional

Constitutional supremacy, the block of constitutionality, due process guarantees, personal liberty, habeas corpus, amparo, and constitutional review.

3/40 written-assessment points

Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos

American Convention on Human Rights, Inter-American Court jurisprudence, effective defense standards, pre-trial detention limits, and conventionality control.

10/40 written-assessment points (two drawn topics)

Derecho Penal

Current substantive criminal law under Ley 74-25 as amended by Ley 44-26, including legality, punishable conduct, typicality, unlawfulness, culpability, justification grounds, attempt, participation, and penalties.

10/40 written-assessment points (two drawn topics)

Derecho Procesal Penal

Current criminal procedure under Ley 97-25, including adversarial principles, defense rights, coercive measures, preliminary hearings, trial procedure, evidence rules, and appeals.

4/40 written-assessment points

Derecho Penal Juvenil

Specialized juvenile justice under Ley 136-03, age of criminal responsibility, specialized procedural rights, socio-educational sanctions, and liberty deprivation limits.

5/40 written-assessment points

Análisis de Caso

Applied written analysis of a supplied case. The local MCQs reinforce issue spotting and rule application but do not simulate or replace this written performance task.

How to Pass the Dominican Public Defender Competition Exam

What You Need to Know

Passing score: 80/100 overall minimum (5 points academic merits, 20 points behavioral interview, 40 points written assessment, 35 points oral examination, and satisfactory eliminatory psychometric evaluation)
Assessment: Documentary and academic merit review (5 points); psychometric assessment (eliminatory, unweighted); behavioral-competencies interview (20 points); written examination featuring eight drawn legal topics and a case analysis over 3 hours (40 points); and an oral examination before the examining board, with 15 minutes of preparation and up to 1 hour 36 minutes of presentation (35 points). The overall minimum passing score is 80/100. Successful aspirants enter a 12-month initial training program administered by the Escuela Nacional de la Judicatura (ENJ) before career appointment.
Time limit: 3 hours for the written assessment; 15 minutes of preparation plus up to 1 hour 36 minutes for the oral assessment
Exam fee: RD$1,000 non-refundable cash application payment

Keys to Passing

Work through all 100 available questions
Review every answer and explanation
Track weak areas and revisit them
Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

Dominican Public Defender Competition Study Tips from Top Performers

1Allocate study time in line with the official written-assessment weights: Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure carry 10 points each, followed by Constitutional Law at 5, Juvenile Criminal Law at 4, and General Theory and International Human Rights at 3 each; separately practice the 5-point written case analysis.

2Study current Dominican legislation directly: the 2024 Constitution, Ley 277-04, the Código Penal instituted by Ley 74-25 and amended by Ley 44-26, the Código Procesal Penal instituted by Ley 97-25, and Ley 136-03 as amended.

3Review key Inter-American Court of Human Rights decisions regarding the right to effective legal defense and standards on pre-trial detention.

4Practice applying abstract legal principles to realistic factual scenarios, as the written exam features case analysis alongside theoretical questions.

5Prepare oral explanations of complex legal issues, as the oral evaluation constitutes 35 points of the final evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this practice bank an official translation or simulation of the ONDP competition?

No. This practice bank is an independent English-language MCQ study adaptation. The reviewed official materials do not publish an assessment-language field, and the actual written assessment uses drawn legal topics and case analysis rather than a published multiple-choice format. This bank is designed for conceptual mastery and cannot replace case analysis, oral examination, behavioral interview, psychometric assessment, or practical training preparation.

What are the stages and scoring breakdown of the competition?

The selection process evaluates academic merits (5 points), a behavioral-competencies interview (20 points), a written legal examination and case analysis (40 points), and an oral examination (35 points). Psychometric testing is eliminatory but unweighted. Candidates must achieve an overall minimum score of 80 out of 100 points to qualify for training.

Which legal subject areas are included in the official written assessment?

The official bases allocate the 40-point written assessment as follows: General Theory of Law 3 points, Constitutional Law 5, International Human Rights 3, Criminal Law 10 across two drawn topics, Criminal Procedure 10 across two drawn topics, Juvenile Criminal Law 4, and case analysis 5.

What training follows successful completion of the competition?

Aspirants who pass the competition enter a mandatory 12-month initial training program delivered by the Escuela Nacional de la Judicatura (ENJ). Successful completion of the ENJ program is legally required under Ley 277-04 before formal swearing-in and incorporation into the Public Defender Career.

Who is eligible to participate in the ONDP Public Defender competition?

Applicants must hold Dominican nationality (by birth, origin, or naturalization), possess a recognized law degree (licenciatura or doctorado in law), hold an active legal exequatur with at least two years of professional practice with exequatur, demonstrate moral and psychological fitness, and have no disqualifying criminal or disciplinary records.