All Practice Exams

100+ Free China Certified Tax Adviser — Tax-Related Service Law Practice Questions

China Certified Tax Adviser Qualification Examination — Tax-Related Service Law (全国税务师职业资格考试 — 涉税服务相关法律) practice questions are available now; exam metadata is being verified.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
100+ Questions
100% Free

Loading practice questions...

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: China Certified Tax Adviser — Tax-Related Service Law Exam

Exam Paper

Administering Body

Exam Duration

Full Marks / Passing Score

Rolling Validity Window

Exam Schedule

Core Subject Areas

The China CTA Tax-Related Service Law examination is the definitive legal benchmark for tax professionals in China. Tested via a 150-minute computer-based format totaling 140 points (84 to pass), the curriculum bridges administrative tax enforcement, civil contract and property disputes, corporate governance under the 2023 Company Law, and criminal tax liability. This 100-question bank delivers rigorous, scenario-based practice with complete legal analyses.

Sample China Certified Tax Adviser — Tax-Related Service Law Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your China Certified Tax Adviser — Tax-Related Service Law exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Under the general principles of PRC Administrative Law, which administrative principle requires that administrative organs must not adopt measures that impose burdens or restrict rights disproportionately when achieving a lawful administrative objective (principle of minimum impairment / 最小侵害原则)?
A.Principle of Legal Administration (合法行政原则)
B.Principle of Proportionality / Reasonableness (合理行政原则中的比例原则)
C.Principle of Procedural Justice (程序正当原则)
D.Principle of Honesty and Trustworthiness (诚实守信原则)
Explanation: The Principle of Proportionality (比例原则) is a core sub-principle of Reasonableness in Administrative Law (合理行政原则). It encompasses three elements: appropriateness (妥当性/适当性), necessity (必要性 / least restrictive means / 最小侵害原则), and proportionality in the narrow sense (狭义比例性 / balance of benefits vs burdens). Under this principle, when multiple means can achieve the administrative goal, the agency must choose the measure causing the least damage to the rights and interests of citizens or enterprises.
2In PRC Administrative Law, what is the fundamental legal distinction between an 'Authorized Organization' (被授权组织) and an 'Entrusted Organization' (受委托组织) regarding legal responsibility and litigation defendant status?
A.An authorized organization exercises administrative powers under contract, whereas an entrusted organization exercises powers directly derived from administrative regulations.
B.An authorized organization exercises administrative powers in its own name pursuant to statutory authorization and bears legal responsibility independently as a defendant, whereas an entrusted organization acts in the name of the entrusting administrative organ, which remains the defendant in litigation.
C.An entrusted organization may independently impose administrative detention, whereas an authorized organization is strictly limited to issuing warnings and fines.
D.An authorized organization must be a formal state organ, whereas an entrusted organization must be a private commercial corporation.
Explanation: Under PRC Administrative Law, an Authorized Organization (被授权组织) obtains administrative power directly from a Law (法律) or Regulation (法规). It exercises powers in its own name and independently assumes legal liability as the defendant in administrative litigation or reconsideration. In contrast, an Entrusted Organization (受委托组织) derives authority from an administrative delegation/entrustment by an administrative organ. It must act in the name of the entrusting organ, and the entrusting organ bears all legal liabilities and serves as the litigation defendant.
3Under the PRC Civil Servant Law (中华人民共和国公务员法) and the Administrative Discipline Law for Public Officials (公职人员政务处分法), which of the following lists the correct statutory duration of disciplinary sanctions in ascending order?
A.Warning (警告, 6 months) < De-merit (记过, 12 months) < Major De-merit (记大过, 18 months) < Demotion (降级, 24 months) = Dismissal from post (撤职, 24 months)
B.Warning (警告, 3 months) < De-merit (记过, 6 months) < Major De-merit (记大过, 12 months) < Demotion (降级, 18 months) < Dismissal from post (撤职, 24 months)
C.Warning (警告, 6 months) < De-merit (记过, 12 months) < Major De-merit (记大过, 18 months) < Demotion (降级, 18 months) < Dismissal from post (撤职, 36 months)
D.Warning (警告, 12 months) < De-merit (记过, 18 months) < Demotion (降级, 24 months) < Dismissal from post (撤职, 36 months)
Explanation: Under Article 64 of the PRC Civil Servant Law and Article 7 of the Administrative Discipline Law for Public Officials, the statutory disciplinary sanctions and their respective periods are: (1) Warning (警告) — 6 months; (2) De-merit (记过) — 12 months; (3) Major De-merit (记大过) — 18 months; (4) Demotion (降级) — 24 months; (5) Dismissal from post (撤职) — 24 months; and (6) Expulsion (开除) — permanent termination of public employment.
4Under the PRC Administrative Licensing Law (中华人民共和国行政许可法), which level of legal enactments is permitted to establish TEMPORARY administrative licenses (临时性行政许可), and what is the statutory maximum validity period if no local regulation is subsequently enacted?
A.State Council Department Rules (部门规章); valid for a maximum of 6 months.
B.Provincial, Autonomous Regional, and Municipal People's Government Rules (省、自治区、直辖市人民政府规章); valid for a maximum of 1 year.
C.Municipal People's Congress Local Regulations (设区的市地方性法规); valid for a maximum of 2 years.
D.County-level People's Government Regulatory Documents (规范性文件); valid for a maximum of 3 years.
Explanation: Under Article 15 of the PRC Administrative Licensing Law, where a law or administrative regulation has not been formulated, Provincial, Autonomous Regional, and Municipal People's Government Rules (省、自治区、直辖市人民政府规章) may establish temporary administrative licenses. If it is necessary to continue implementing the administrative license after 1 year, the provincial government must propose to the provincial People's Congress or its Standing Committee to enact a local regulation (地方性法规). Otherwise, the temporary licensing expires after 1 year.
5Unless a specific law or administrative regulation provides otherwise, what is the statutory time limit under the PRC Administrative Licensing Law for an administrative organ to render a written licensing decision when it cannot make a decision on the spot?
A.Within 10 working days from the date of accepting the application, extendable by 5 working days.
B.Within 20 working days from the date of accepting the application, extendable by 10 working days upon approval by the head of the administrative organ.
C.Within 30 calendar days from the date of accepting the application, extendable by 15 calendar days.
D.Within 60 working days from the date of accepting the application, non-extendable.
Explanation: Under Article 42 of the PRC Administrative Licensing Law, an administrative organ shall render a decision on an administrative license within 20 working days from the date of accepting the application (excluding statutory hearing, bidding, auction, and expert evaluation periods). If a decision cannot be made within 20 working days, it may be extended by up to 10 working days upon approval by the person in charge of the administrative organ, and the applicant must be notified in writing of the reasons for extension.
6An enterprise obtained a dangerous chemical tax-handling license by submitting falsified environmental safety reports and bribing licensing officials. Two years later, the tax and environmental authorities uncovered the fraud. How should the administrative organ legally handle this license under the Administrative Licensing Law?
A.Withdraw the license (撤回行政许可) and pay reasonable economic compensation to the enterprise.
B.Revoke the license (撤销行政许可); the enterprise shall not receive any compensation, and the applicant shall not apply for the same license within 3 years (or 1 year for non-safety matters).
C.Declare the license naturally invalid (注销行政许可) without any further administrative restrictions.
D.Issue a retroactive modification (变更行政许可) and require supplementary documents without revoking the existing qualification.
Explanation: Under Article 69 and Article 79 of the PRC Administrative Licensing Law, where a licensee obtains an administrative license through fraudulent means such as deception, bribery, or providing false materials, the license must be Revoked (撤销). Because the defect was caused entirely by the applicant's fraudulent conduct, no compensation is payable. Furthermore, under Article 79, an applicant who obtains a license by fraud shall not apply for the same license within 3 years (and where it involves public security, human health, or ecological safety, criminal liability may be pursued).
7Under the 2021 Revised PRC Administrative Punishment Law (中华人民共和国行政处罚法), which of the following administrative penalties can ONLY be created by a National Law (法律) and executed exclusively by Public Security Organs?
A.Order to suspend production and business operations (责令停产停业)
B.Administrative detention (行政拘留)
C.Confiscation of illegal gains and unlawful property (没收违法所得、没收非法财物)
D.Imposition of high-amount administrative fines (较大数额罚款)
Explanation: Under Article 10 and Article 18 of the PRC Administrative Punishment Law (2021 Revision), administrative penalties restricting personal freedom (限制人身自由的行政处罚, specifically Administrative Detention / 行政拘留) can ONLY be established by a National Law (法律 enacted by the NPC or its Standing Committee) and can only be enforced by Public Security Organs (公安机关) or other organs specifically authorized by national law.
8Under the 2021 Revised PRC Administrative Punishment Law, what is the maximum authority of State Council Departmental Rules (部门规章) regarding the establishment of administrative penalties where no higher law or administrative regulation exists?
A.Departmental rules may establish administrative detention and property confiscation up to RMB 50,000.
B.Departmental rules may only establish Warnings (警告), Notices of Criticism (通报批评), and Fines within limits prescribed by the State Council.
C.Departmental rules may establish revocation of business licenses and qualification certificates.
D.Departmental rules may freely establish any administrative penalty except the death penalty.
Explanation: Under Article 13 of the 2021 Revised PRC Administrative Punishment Law, where laws or administrative regulations have not been enacted, State Council Departmental Rules (部门规章) may only establish Warnings (警告), Notices of Criticism (通报批评), and Fines (罚款) within the limits prescribed by the State Council. They have NO authority to establish penalties restricting personal freedom, revoking business licenses, or ordering suspension of production/business.
9Company X committed a single act of illegal invoice trading. The local Market Regulation Bureau investigated and imposed an administrative fine of RMB 50,000. Subsequently, the District Tax Bureau investigated the exact same transaction and attempted to impose an additional fine of RMB 80,000 for the same act. How does the 'Non Bis In Idem' rule (一事不再罚原则) under Article 29 of the PRC Administrative Punishment Law apply?
A.The Tax Bureau cannot impose an additional fine for the exact same illegal act, but may still order supplementary payment of taxes, confiscate illegal invoices, or suspend tax-invoice issuance.
B.The Tax Bureau may impose the full RMB 80,000 fine because tax authorities possess superior administrative status over market regulation authorities.
C.The Tax Bureau can fine the company again as long as the second fine exceeds the first fine by more than 50%.
D.The prior fine by the Market Regulation Bureau is automatically nullified, and only the Tax Bureau fine remains enforceable.
Explanation: Under Article 29 of the PRC Administrative Punishment Law, for the exact same illegal act committed by a party, more than one Administrative Fine (罚款) shall NOT be imposed by administrative organs (一事不再罚款原则). However, this prohibition applies strictly to duplicate fines; other distinct types of penalties (e.g., confiscation of illegal proceeds, revocation of permits) or non-punitive tax recovery measures (demanding back taxes and late surcharges) may still be applied concurrently.
10Under the 2021 Revised PRC Administrative Punishment Law, what are the maximum monetary thresholds for administrative law enforcement officers to impose and collect administrative fines on the spot under the Summary Procedure (简易程序 / 当场处罚)?
A.Fines not exceeding RMB 50 for natural persons; fines not exceeding RMB 1,000 for legal persons or other organizations.
B.Fines not exceeding RMB 200 for natural persons; fines not exceeding RMB 3,000 for legal persons or other organizations.
C.Fines not exceeding RMB 500 for natural persons; fines not exceeding RMB 5,000 for legal persons or other organizations.
D.Fines not exceeding RMB 1,000 for natural persons; fines not exceeding RMB 10,000 for legal persons or other organizations.
Explanation: Under Article 51 of the 2021 Revised PRC Administrative Punishment Law, where facts of an illegal act are clear, evidence is conclusive, and the statutory basis is well-founded, law enforcement officers may render an on-the-spot administrative penalty decision (Summary Procedure) for warnings or fines not exceeding RMB 200 for citizens (natural persons) and not exceeding RMB 3,000 for legal persons or other organizations (increased from RMB 50 and RMB 1,000 in the pre-2021 law).

About the China Certified Tax Adviser — Tax-Related Service Law Practice Questions

Verified exam format metadata for China Certified Tax Adviser Qualification Examination — Tax-Related Service Law (全国税务师职业资格考试 — 涉税服务相关法律) is pending. The practice questions above remain available while official exam length, timing, passing score, fee, and administrator details are reviewed.