PracticeVideosBlogFlashcards
Cheat sheet

EPSO AD5 Cheat Sheet

Final ranking: Verbal Reasoning (Language 1)

35%of exam

Competition Structure & ThresholdsVerbal Reasoning Deduction RulesClosed-World Hermetic BoxQuantifiers & Modal Verbs

Final ranking: EU Knowledge (Language 2)

25%of exam

Final ranking: Digital Skills (DigComp 2.2)

25%of exam

DigComp 2.2 Five AreasCybersecurity & 3-2-1 BackupsRegulation 2018/1725 & EDPSEU AI Act Risk Tiers

Final ranking: Written Test — EUFTE (Language 2)

15%of exam

Five Official EUFTE Anchors40-Minute Pacing ProtocolBLUF Briefing StructurePreliminary 1.5x Marking Cutoff

Numerical & Abstract: Mandatory, Unranked

0%of exam

Combined 10/20 Pass HurdleNumerical Reasoning Core FormulasAbstract Reasoning SCOPO ScanBoolean Overlap & Chirality

Quick Facts

Competition
EPSO/AD/427/26 (AD5)
Administrator
EPSO via TAO platform
MCQ Total
110 MCQs across 5 tests
Part 1 (L1)
Verbal, Numerical, Abstract (65m)
Part 2 (L2)
EU, Digital, EUFTE (110m)
Language Rule
Different languages: C1 and B2
Ranking Ribbon
Final-score weights, not content shares
Reserve List
1,490 places sought (2026)

Preliminary vs Final Ranking Weights

Preliminary Ranking

  • Verbal Reasoning weighted 40%
  • EU Knowledge weighted 30%
  • Digital Skills weighted 30%

Final Ranking

  • Verbal 35%, EU 25%
  • Digital Skills weighted 25%
  • EUFTE essay weighted 15%

Numerical/abstract: mandatory combined qualifying threshold

Verbal Reasoning Option Triage

  1. Conclusion requires unsupported outside evidence→Reject as unproved by passage(Hermetic box)
  2. Only premise says most, option all→Reject unjustified universal conclusion
  3. Option reverses 'If P then Q'→Check contrapositive (~Q then ~P)
  4. Passage says 'associated with'→Reject direct causation claims
  5. Passage has 'save where' clause→Verify exception is respected

Competition Structure & Thresholds

Verbal Reasoning
20 Q, 35m, pass 1035% final
Numerical + Abstract
10+10 Q, 30m, pass 10Pass-fail
EU Knowledge
30 Q, 40m, pass 1525% final
Digital Skills
40 Q, 30m, pass 2025% final
Written Test (EUFTE)
40m essay, pass 5 of 1015% final
Preliminary Ranking
40% Verbal, 30% EU, 30% DigitalMarking limit; increase possible for ties

Verbal Reasoning Deduction Rules

Hermetic Box Rule
Use passage evidence and valid inferences105 seconds average, not cutoff
Contrapositive Equivalence
If P then Q = ~Q->~P
Affirming the Consequent
Q occurred, so P: invalid
Denying the Antecedent
Not P, so not Q: invalid
Degree Inflation Trap
Turning 'most/may' into 'all/must'
Causal Inversion Trap
Reversing X->Y into Y->X

Council QMV Double Majority

All 27: 55% states, 65% population; proposal-dependent

Commission/HR proposal: 15/27 statesPopulation threshold: 65%Population block: ≥4 states, >35%No Commission/HR proposal: 20/27

Regulation vs Directive (Art. 288 TFEU)

Regulation

  • Binding in its entirety
  • General application across EU
  • Directly applicable without transposition

Directive

  • Binding as to result
  • Addressed to Member States
  • Requires national transposition law

Direct law vs transposed result

EU Legal Instrument & Procedure Picker

  1. Directly applicable uniform law needed→Adopt Regulation (Art. 288 TFEU)(No transposition)
  2. Binding result, national form choice→Adopt Directive (Art. 288 TFEU)(Needs transposition)
  3. Supplement non-essential legislative elements→Delegated Act (Art. 290 TFEU)(EP/Council objection)
  4. Uniform execution conditions required→Implementing Act (Art. 291 TFEU)(Commission usually; Council exceptions)
  5. Standard co-decision lawmaking triggered→Ordinary Legislative Procedure (Art. 294)(EP + Council)

Founding & Reform Treaties

Paris (1951 / 1952)
Created ECSC; expired July 200250-yr sunset
Rome (1957 / 1958)
Created EEC and EuratomUnlimited
Single European Act (1986)
1992 Single Market; QMV expansion
Maastricht (1992 / 1993)
Three pillars, EMU, EU citizenship
Amsterdam (1997) & Nice (2001)
Schengen integration; enlargement voting prep
Lisbon (2007 / 2009)
Abolished pillars; binding Rights CharterTEU & TFEU

Five Exclusive Competences (Art. 3 TFEU)

Customs, Competition, Euro Monetary, Marine Fish, Common Trade

Customs unionInternal market competitionEuro monetary; marine biological conservationCommon commercial policy

Delegated vs Implementing Acts

Delegated (Art. 290)

  • Supplements non-essential legislative elements
  • No Comitology committee vote
  • Ex-post EP or Council objection

Implementing (Art. 291)

  • Uniform implementation conditions
  • Commission usually; Council exceptionally
  • Commission powers: Member State committee controls

Supplement law vs uniform execution

EU Competences & Legal Acts

Exclusive Competence (Art. 3)
Customs, competition, euro, marine-conservation, tradeArticle 3 scope conditions apply
Shared Competence (Art. 4)
Internal market, environment, cohesion, AFSJ
Supporting Competence (Art. 6)
Health, industry, culture, education, civil-protection, administrationAlso tourism, youth and sport
Subsidiarity Yellow Card
8 weeks; at least one-third votesArticle 76 proposals: one-quarter
Regulation (Art. 288 TFEU)
General, binding, directly applicable throughout EU
Directive (Art. 288 TFEU)
Binds result; requires national transposition

European Council vs Council of the EU

European Council

  • 27 Heads of State/Government
  • 2.5-year elected President
  • Zero legislative power (Art. 15)

Council of the EU

  • 27 national portfolio ministers
  • Rotating presidency; Foreign Affairs exception
  • Co-legislator with EP (Art. 16)

Political strategy vs co-legislation

Seven EU Institutions (Art. 13 TEU)

European Parliament (Art. 14)
720 MEPs; 6-96 seats per state
European Council (Art. 15)
Heads of state/government; no lawmaking
Council of the EU (Art. 16)
10 configurations; six-month presidency; 18-month trios
European Commission (Art. 17)
27 Commissioners; main legislative initiatorTreaty exceptions exist
CJEU in Luxembourg (Art. 19)
27 ECJ judges + 54 GC judges
ECB in Frankfurt
2% inflation target; 8-yr Board
Court of Auditors (ECA)
27 members; annual DAS assurance

QMV, Council & Legislative Rules

Standard QMV Double Majority
55% states (15); 65% populationAll 27; Commission/HR proposal
Blocking Population Threshold
At least four states; >35% populationState-count threshold also matters
Reinforced QMV
72% states (20); 65% populationAll 27; no Commission/HR proposal
Foreign Affairs Council
High Representative; trade: rotating presidency
Motion of Censure (Art. 234)
Two-thirds cast + majority of MEPs
EP Political Group Minimum
23 MEPs across 7+ Member States

EU Budget, MFF & Core Policies

MFF Adoption (Art. 312)
Council unanimity + EP majority consent
Own Resources (Art. 311)
Customs, VAT, plastic-waste, and GNI
RRF Green & Digital Targets
Climate ≥37%; digital ≥20%Digital excludes REPowerEU chapter
Climate Law (Reg. 2021/1119)
2030: net −55% versus 19902050: climate neutrality
Delegated Acts (Art. 290)
Amend/supplement non-essential elements; legislative controls
Implementing Acts (Art. 291)
Uniform implementation; usually Commission, exceptionally Council

DigComp Security & Tech Picker

  1. IP works; hostname resolution returns error→Investigate DNS response and queried name(Not proof all routing works)
  2. Need legally handwritten-equivalent signature→Use eIDAS Qualified Signature (QES)
  3. EU institution processes personal data→Check 2018/1725 scope and bases(No legitimate-interests basis listed)
  4. LLM cites CJEU case law→Verify citation on EUR-Lex(Hallucination risk)
  5. Redistributing copyleft-covered modified software→Check source, notice and compatibility duties

DigComp 2.2, Security & EU AI Act

Five DigComp 2.2 Areas
Info, Comm, Content, Safety, Problem-solving45s / item
Phishing-Resistant MFA
FIDO2 hardware key beats SMS
3-2-1 Backup Rule
3 copies, 2 media, 1 off-site
Reg. (EU) 2018/1725
EU institution data protection (EDPS)
Creative Commons BY-NC-ND
Attribution; noncommercial; no sharing adaptations
EU AI Act (2024/1689)
Prohibitions, high-risk and transparency obligationsCheck scope and application dates

Five EUFTE Grading Anchors

Flow, Concise, Clear, Audience-Tailored, Use Provided Dossier

Flow: logical structureConcise & Clear proseTailored to target audienceUse supplied dossier facts

EUFTE: Editorial 40-Minute Pacing Example

  1. Pre-exam background dossier published→Study facts and structure ahead(Save test time)
  2. Minutes 0-8 of EUFTE start→Fix role, audience, section headings
  3. Minutes 8-35 active drafting→Write BLUF + balanced options(Own words only)
  4. Minutes 35-40 final check→Verify all tasks and conciseness

SCOPO Abstract Scan Order

Shape, Count, Orientation, Position, Overlap in 60 seconds

Shape: polygon contoursCount: sides and pipsOrientation: rotation vs flipPosition & Overlap: grid/XOR

Relative Percentage vs Percentage Points

Relative % Change

  • Divide change by old base
  • 20% to 25% is +25%
  • Proportional growth rate

Percentage Points

  • Simple arithmetic difference
  • 20% to 25% is +5 pp
  • Absolute rate gap

Ratio to base vs subtraction

Numerical Reasoning Core Formulas

Relative Percentage Change
(New − Old) / Old×100%; nonzero reference base
Reverse Percentage Base
Final / nonzero change multiplier
Compound +x% then -x%
Net change = −x²/100 percentPositive base; 0<x<100
Weighted Average
Σ(weight × value) / ΣweightsPositive total weight
Non-Base Index Change
(I2 − I1) / I1×100%; I1 nonzero
Decimal Time Conversion
0.4 hours equals 24 minutes

Rigid Rotation vs Axial Reflection

Rigid Rotation

  • Turns around a center point
  • Preserves clockwise feature chirality
  • 180-deg equals two perpendicular flips

Axial Reflection

  • Flips across mirror axis
  • Reverses clockwise feature chirality
  • Creates mirror-image orientation

Same handedness vs mirror flip

Abstract Reasoning SCOPO & Boolean

SCOPO Scan Hierarchy
Shape, Count, Orientation, Position, OverlapEditorial mnemonic; 60s average
Rigid Rotation
Preserves clockwise perimeter feature order
Axial Reflection
Flips chirality to mirror image
Boolean XOR Superposition
Shared overlapping elements cancel out
Conservation Sum Rule
Test candidate invariant across every frame
Option Comparison
Options suggest hypotheses; verify against sequence

Common Traps

Language Choice vs Same Language

L2: another official EU language ≠ L2 identical to L1

Qualifying Scores vs Ranking Contributions

Numerical/abstract: mandatory combined pass threshold ≠ Verbal: pass threshold plus ranking contribution

External Truth vs Passage Entailment

Real-world plausibility alone ≠ Conclusion supported by passage premises

Different Council Institutions

Council of Europe: separate international organization ≠ European Council: EU political-direction institution

Different Data-Protection Lawful Bases

2018/1725 Article5: no legitimate-interests basis ≠ GDPR Article6(f): conditional legitimate-interests basis

Passing vs Reserve-List Selection

Meeting each qualifying threshold ≠ Reaching final-ranked places and passing eligibility

Last Minute

  1. 1.L1 (C1): Verbal, Numerical, Abstract
  2. 2.L2 (B2): EU, Digital, EUFTE
  3. 3.MCQ pass marks: 50% per hurdle
  4. 4.Final weights: verbal 35%; EU 25%
  5. 5.Final weights: digital 25%; EUFTE 15%
  6. 6.EUFTE: 15% weight, pass 5/10
  7. 7.QMV (27 states): 15; 65% population
  8. 8.Population blocking: ≥4 states and >35%
  9. 9.Regulations apply directly; Directives transpose
  10. 10.Verbal: contrapositive valid; outside facts fail
  11. 11.Numerical: identify reference base and units
  12. 12.SCOPO: Shape, Count, Orientation, Position, Overlap
  13. 13.SCOPO is an editorial mnemonic
  14. 14.Rotation preserves handedness; reflection reverses it
  15. 15.Follow marking instructions; manage remaining time
Same family resources

Explore More EU & European Civil Service Exams

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.