Biological Bases
10%of exam
Cognitive-Affective Bases
13%of exam
Social-Cultural Bases
11%of exam
Lifespan Development
12%of exam
Assessment + Diagnosis
16%of exam
Intervention + Supervision
15%of exam
Research + Statistics
7%of exam
Ethics + Legal
16%of exam
Scientific Orientation
6%of exam
Skills Assessment
33%of exam
Relational Competence
16%of exam
Professionalism
11%of exam
Ethical Practice
17%of exam
Collaboration + Supervision
17%of exam
Quick Facts
- Exam
- EPPP
- Owner
- ASPPB
- Parts
- Knowledge + Skills
- Part 1
- 225 items
- Part 2
- 170 items
- Scale
- 200-800
- Pass
- 500 recommended
- Vendor
- Pearson VUE
- Retakes
- 4 per 12 months
Part 1 Domains
Big Cognitions Shape Lifespan Assessment Treatment Research Ethics
Biological
- Hypothalamus
- Drives homeostasis
- Hippocampus
- New memory
- Amygdala
- Fear salience
- Cerebellum
- Coordination
- Dopamine
- Reward movement
- Serotonin
- Mood sleep
- GABA
- Inhibitory calming
- Acetylcholine
- Memory muscles
Classical vs Operant
Classical
- Stimulus pairing
- Reflexive response
- Before behavior
Operant
- Consequence learning
- Voluntary behavior
- After behavior
Antecedent versus consequence
Cognitive-Affective
- Classical
- Stimulus pairing
- Operant
- Consequence learning
- Generalization
- Similar stimulus responds
- Discrimination
- Differentiate stimuli
- Extinction
- Response weakens
- Recovery
- Response returns
- Working memory
- Active manipulation
- Executive function
- Planning inhibition
Lifespan
- Sensorimotor
- Object permanence
- Preoperational
- Egocentric symbols
- Concrete
- Logical conservation
- Formal
- Abstract reasoning
- Secure
- Comfort exploration
- Avoidant
- Minimizes distress
- Authoritative
- Warm firm
- Integrity
- Late-life task
Reliability vs Validity
Reliability
- Consistency
- Repeatable scores
- Needed first
Validity
- Accuracy
- Measures construct
- Usefulness claim
Reliable can still miss
Assessment Picker
- Need cognitive ability→WAIS(Adults)
- Need personality pathology→MMPI(Broad screen)
- Need diagnosis→Clinical interview(DSM frame)
- Need comparison→Normed test(Standard scores)
- Need real-world data→Collateral(Context)
- Data conflict→Integrate sources(Explain limits)
Assessment + Diagnosis
- Reliability
- Consistency
- Validity
- Measures target
- Sensitivity
- Finds positives
- Specificity
- Rules out
- WAIS
- Adult intelligence
- MMPI
- Personality pathology
- Structured interview
- Standardized questions
- Differential diagnosis
- Rule alternatives
Sensitivity vs Specificity
Sensitivity
- Finds true cases
- Few false negatives
- Screening strength
Specificity
- Rules out noncases
- Few false positives
- Confirming strength
Sensitive screens; specific confirms
Treatment Picker
- Automatic thoughts→CBT(Cognitive change)
- Avoided fear→Exposure(Extinction)
- Emotion dysregulation→DBT(Skills)
- Low readiness→MI(Ambivalence)
- Family pattern→Systems(Relationships)
- Unfamiliar condition→Consultation(Competence)
Intervention Core
- CBT
- Thought behavior change
- Exposure
- Fear extinction
- DBT
- Emotion regulation
- MI
- Readiness language
- Psychodynamic
- Unconscious conflict
- Humanistic
- Empathic conditions
- Family systems
- Interaction patterns
- Prevention
- Reduce risk
Correlation vs Causation
Correlation
- Variables covary
- No manipulation
- Direction unknown
Causation
- IV manipulated
- Controls threats
- Temporal order
Association is not cause
Research + Stats
- Experiment
- Manipulates IV
- Correlation
- Association only
- Internal validity
- Causal confidence
- External validity
- Generalizes outward
- Type I
- False positive
- Type II
- False negative
- Power
- Detects effect
- Effect size
- Practical magnitude
Ethics Sequence
Facts, risks, code, law, consult, document
Part 1 vs Part 2
Part 1
- Knowledge base
- 225 items
- 175 scored
Part 2
- Applied skills
- 170 items
- 130 scored
Knowledge before skills
Ethics Picker
- Imminent harm→Protect(Law controls)
- Child abuse→Report(Mandated)
- Dual service→Clarify roles(Consent)
- Competence gap→Refer consult(Training)
- Law-ethics conflict→Resolve conflict(Document)
- Court order→Check scope(Disclose minimum)
Exam Logistics
- Part 1
- 175 scored
- Part 1 pretest
- 50 unscored
- Part 1 time
- 4h15 item time
- Part 2
- 130 scored
- Part 2 pretest
- 40 unscored
- Part 2 time
- 4h10 item time
- Tutorials
- 5 and 9 minutes
- Arrival
- 30 minutes early
Confidentiality vs Privilege
Confidentiality
- Ethical duty
- Protect information
- Clinical relationship
Privilege
- Legal right
- Blocks testimony
- Court context
Ethics differs from evidence
Fees + Scoring
- Part 1 fee
- $600
- Part 2 fee
- $450
- Seat fee
- $91.88
- Late change
- $87.50 plus tax
- No-show
- All fees forfeited
- Scale
- 200-800
- Independent pass
- 500 recommended
- Supervised pass
- 450 recommended
Ethics + Legal
- Consent
- Informed agreement
- Assent
- Minor agreement
- Confidentiality
- Protect information
- Privilege
- Legal protection
- Tarasoff
- Duty protect
- Mandated reporting
- Required disclosure
- Competence
- Practice within training
- Multiple roles
- Risk impairment
Part 2 Domains
Science Assesses Relationships Professionally Ethically Collaboratively
Assessment Sequence
Question, method, norms, data, integrate, communicate
Part 2 Picker
- Research question→Evaluate evidence(Science)
- Assessment question→Match method(Psychometrics)
- Cultural mismatch→Adapt approach(Context)
- Interpersonal rupture→Clarify repair(Relationship)
- Own limits→Seek feedback(Professionalism)
- Supervisee risk→Direct supervision(Plan)
Skills Assessment Core
- Referral question
- Assessment anchor
- Norms
- Comparison group
- Collateral
- Outside source
- Integration
- Multiple data sources
- Context
- Interpretation boundary
- Feedback
- Useful communication
- Diagnosis
- Taxonomy formulation
- Recommendation
- Actionable next step
Relational + Professional
- Empathy
- Accurate understanding
- Respect
- Value differences
- Clarification
- Seek meaning
- Conflict
- Address directly
- Scope
- Competence boundary
- Consultation
- When uncertain
- Feedback
- Accept and integrate
- Correction
- Repair errors
Competence vs Confidence
Competence
- Training based
- Evidence supported
- Documented limits
Confidence
- Subjective comfort
- Insufficient alone
- Bias vulnerable
Confidence never expands scope
Ethical Practice Core
- Records
- Complete accurate
- Billing
- Truthful compliant
- Law conflict
- Clarify obligations
- Ethics conflict
- Resolve proactively
- Credit
- Assign fairly
- Bias
- Monitor impact
- Consult
- Document rationale
- Standards
- Guide conduct
Consultation vs Supervision
Consultation
- Advice seeking
- Consultee decides
- Often episodic
Supervision
- Oversight role
- Supervisor responsibility
- Ongoing evaluation
Authority changes responsibility
Collaboration + Supervision
- Systems
- Organizational factors
- Interdisciplinary
- Shared client goals
- Consultation request
- Tailored question
- Program evaluation
- Outcome monitoring
- Supervision plan
- Roles procedures
- High risk
- Specific procedures
- Anchored feedback
- Behavior examples
- Supervisee scope
- Within competence
Common Traps
Pretest Items
Unscored invisible ≠ Answer every item
Score Scale
Scaled score ≠ Not percent correct
Jurisdiction Rules
Board controls licensure ≠ ASPPB administers exam
Part 2 Eligibility
Part 1 first ≠ Separate approval needed
Name Match
Registration name ≠ ID name exactly
Assessment Reports
Data limitations ≠ Not overclaims
Duty To Protect
Confidentiality limited ≠ Reasonable protection steps
Supervision Boundaries
Supervisee status disclosed ≠ Scope monitored
Last Minute
- 1.Part 1: 175 scored
- 2.Part 2: 130 scored
- 3.Pretest items are invisible
- 4.Scaled score, not percentage
- 5.500 is independent recommendation
- 6.Board controls final licensure
- 7.Bring two matching IDs
- 8.Arrive 30 minutes early
- 9.Reliability before validity
- 10.Sensitivity screens; specificity confirms
- 11.Consult when competence uncertain
- 12.Document ethics reasoning

Social + Cultural
SO