Cheat sheet

ACDIS CCDS Cheat Sheet

IPPS Regulations & Reimbursement

12.5%of exam

A&P, Pathophysiology & Pharmacology

19.2%of exam

Medical Record Documentation

19.2%of exam

CDI Program Analysis

8.3%of exam

CDI Program MetricsResponse Rate vs Agreement RateCMI Change vs CDI CreditPEPPER Report

Communication Skills

9.2%of exam

CDI Communication ConceptsWorking DRG vs Final DRGNonconfrontational EducationDRG Reconciliation

Official Coding Guidelines

14.2%of exam

UHDDS & Sequencing RulesDiagnosis Sequencing PickerPrincipal Diagnosis RulesUncertain Diagnosis Exceptions

Professionalism, Ethics & Compliance

9.2%of exam

Ethics & Compliance TermsLeading vs Compliant QueryDRG CreepQuery Count vs Query Pattern

Quality Impact of Diagnoses

8.3%of exam

Quick Facts

Exam
CCDS
Credential
Clinical Documentation Specialist
Items
140 (120 scored)
Time
3 hours
Pass
88 of 120
Retake wait
90 days
Recert
2 yrs / 30 CEUs
Handbook
May 2024

CC vs MCC

CC

  • Complication or comorbidity
  • Standard severity add-on
  • Lower MS-DRG payment bump

MCC

  • Major complication or comorbidity
  • Highest severity add-on
  • Bigger MS-DRG payment bump

MCC outweighs CC

IPPS & MS-DRG Basics

MS-DRG
Fixed payment per DRG
CC
Complication or comorbidity add-on
MCC
Major CC, higher severity tier
CMI
Average MS-DRG relative weight
IPPS Update
Annual rule, effective Oct 1
Two-Midnight Rule
CFR 412.3(d) inpatient test
Grouper
Software assigning the MS-DRG
Relative Weight
DRG's payment multiplier value

Medicare Program-Integrity Contractors

RA
Recovery Auditor finds overpayments
MAC
Medicare Administrative Contractor
CERT
Error-rate testing contractor
OIG
Office of Inspector General

AKI Stage 1 Triggers

0.3 up, 1.5x baseline, or low output

Cr +0.3 mg/dL in 48hCr 1.5-1.9x baseline in 7dUrine <0.5 mL/kg/hr, 6-12h

Sepsis-2 vs Sepsis-3

Sepsis-2

  • SIRS-based definition
  • Two or more criteria
  • Older, still-used standard

Sepsis-3

  • SOFA-based definition
  • Organ dysfunction focus
  • Increasingly payer-preferred

SIRS vs organ dysfunction

Clinical Validation Trigger Picker

  1. Infection, SOFA up 2+→Sepsis-3 criteria met(Organ dysfunction, SIRS not required)
  2. SIRS present, no infection→SIRS only, not sepsis(Check trauma or pancreatitis)
  3. Creatinine up 0.3 in 48h→AKI Stage 1(KDIGO criterion)
  4. PaO2 under 60→Hypoxemic respiratory failure(Room air reading)
  5. PaCO2 over 50, pH low→Hypercapnic respiratory failure(Acute respiratory acidosis)
  6. Two of six ASPEN traits→Malnutrition diagnosis supported(Any severity context applies)

Sepsis Criteria

SIRS
2+ abnormal vitals or labs
Sepsis-2
SIRS plus infection source
Sepsis-3
Infection plus rising SOFA
SOFA
Organ-dysfunction severity score
Septic Shock
Sepsis with persistent hypotension

HFrEF vs HFpEF

HFrEF

  • EF 40% or less
  • Reduced pumping function
  • Classic 'weak heart'

HFpEF

  • EF 50% or more
  • Stiff, poorly relaxing ventricle
  • Near-normal ejection fraction

Low EF vs normal EF

AKI Staging (KDIGO Stage 1)

Cr Trigger
Up 0.3 mg/dL in 48h
Baseline Trigger
1.5-1.9x baseline within 7 days
Urine Trigger
Under 0.5 mL/kg/hr, 6-12h
Any One
Single criterion alone is enough

Respiratory Failure Criteria

Hypoxemic
PaO2 under 60, room air
P/F Ratio
Under 300 on oxygen support
Hypercapnic
PaCO2 over 50, pH low
Support Signs
Oxygen or ventilator assistance used

Other Clinical Indicators

Malnutrition
2 of 6 ASPEN traits
HFrEF
EF 40% or less
HFpEF
EF 50% or more
Metabolic encephalopathy
Systemic cause, diffuse dysfunction
Medication Clue
Drug order prompts a query

Concurrent vs Retrospective Query

Concurrent

  • During the admission
  • Provider can still answer
  • Real-time chart review

Retrospective

  • After discharge occurs
  • Works from closed record
  • Needs a response window

Before discharge vs after

Query Format Picker

  1. New diagnosis suspected→Open-ended or multiple-choice(Never yes/no)
  2. Confirm POA status→Yes/no query(Offer unable to determine)
  3. Confirm existing finding→Yes/no query(e.g., pathology report)
  4. Link two conditions→Yes/no query(Cause-and-effect only)
  5. Several valid diagnoses fit→Multiple-choice query(Add 'other' and 'undetermined')
  6. Urgent, time-sensitive question→Verbal query(Still log and chart)
  7. Complex or disputed issue→Written query(Preserves clear record trail)
  8. Prior encounter finding only→Query only with current trigger(Else record mining)

Query Formats

Open-Ended
Free-text provider explanation
Multiple-Choice
Reasonable options plus 'other'
Yes/No
Confirms one existing fact
Verbal
Spoken, but still logged
Written
Formal, preserves the record trail

Compliant Query Rules

Nonleading
No hint toward one answer
Clinical Indicators
Must be cited and sourced
No Reimbursement Talk
Excluded from query wording
UTD Option
Required in POA yes/no queries
Record Mining
Querying without current trigger
Multiple Queries
Pattern matters, not raw count

Query Recipients & Timing

Provider
Legally accountable diagnosing clinician
Consulting Specialist
Valid within their own findings
Concurrent Query
Sent before patient discharge
Retrospective Query
Sent from the closed record

Response Rate vs Agreement Rate

Response Rate

  • Provider answers at all
  • Engagement measure
  • Low value: unresponsive providers

Agreement Rate

  • Answer supports the diagnosis
  • Accuracy measure
  • Low value: frequent disagreement

Answered vs agreed

CDI Program Metrics

Response Rate
Provider answers query at all
Agreement Rate
Answer supports the suspected diagnosis
CMI Trend
Watch case-mix shifts too
CC/MCC Capture
Documentation completeness metric
PEPPER
CMS payment-pattern percentile report
High-Frequency DRG
Small error, large total exposure

CDI Communication Concepts

Working DRG
CDI's concurrent, in-progress estimate
Final Coded DRG
Coder's closed-record assignment
Reconciliation
Compares working DRG to final
Nonconfrontational Education
Frames queries around data quality
CDI vs Coder
Concurrent versus post-discharge review

UHDDS Sequencing Rule

Principal = reason found after study

Not the admitting diagnosisComplication of care outranks itTies: either may lead

Diagnosis Sequencing Picker

  1. Chiefly responsible after study→Principal diagnosis(Not the admitting diagnosis)
  2. Admission caused by complication→Complication as principal(Outranks underlying condition)
  3. Two diagnoses equally qualify→Either may sequence first(Unless index or tabular directs)
  4. Affects treatment, stay, or monitoring→Code as secondary diagnosis(UHDDS other diagnoses rule)
  5. Still uncertain at discharge→Code as if established(Except HIV, COVID-19, Zika, J09/J10)
  6. Outpatient, still uncertain→Code to highest certainty(Signs and symptoms only)

UHDDS & Sequencing Rules

Principal Diagnosis
Chief reason, found after study
Other Diagnoses
Affect treatment, stay, or monitoring
Uncertain Diagnosis
Coded as if established, inpatient
UD Exceptions
HIV, COVID-19, Zika, J09/J10 flu
Complication of Care
Sequences as the principal diagnosis
Equal Diagnoses
Either may sequence first
Coding Clinic
AHA's official coding advice

Ethics & Compliance Terms

Leading Query
Implies the desired diagnosis
DRG Creep
Unsupported drift to higher DRGs
Code of Ethics
Puts accuracy over reimbursement
Confidentiality
Only access assigned records
Denial Defense
Validate indicators before appealing

POA Payment Logic

Y and W pay; N and U don't

Y: present on admissionW: undetermined, still paysN: not present, no payU: insufficient documentation, no pay

HAC-POA vs HAC Reduction Program

HAC-POA Provision

  • Per-condition CC/MCC hit
  • Triggered by POA N or U
  • Payment-level, case-specific rule

HAC Reduction Program

  • Hospital-level 1% payment cut
  • Worst quartile, PSI 90 plus NHSN
  • Program-level, hospital-wide rule

Condition-level vs hospital-level

POA Indicator Picker

  1. Condition present at admission→Y(CC/MCC payment allowed)
  2. Not present at admission→N(No CC/MCC payment)
  3. Documentation is insufficient→U(Treated like N)
  4. Provider clinically undetermined→W(Treated like Y)

Quality & Risk Measures

PSI 90
PSIs 03, 06, and 08-15
HAC-POA Provision
Blocks CC/MCC for N/U
HAC Reduction Program
1% cut, worst total-score quartile
SOI
Severity of illness, now
ROM
Risk of mortality, 1-4 scale
Readmission/Mortality
Risk-adjusted using coded data

SOI ROM Scale

1 is minor, 4 is extreme

SOI: how sick nowROM: risk of deathScores can diverge by case

SOI vs ROM

SOI

  • Severity of illness
  • How sick right now
  • Scored 1 to 4

ROM

  • Risk of mortality
  • Chance of dying
  • Also scored 1 to 4

Sick now vs death risk

Common Traps

Leading vs Compliant Query

States a conclusion ≠ Compliant cites clinical indicators

SIRS vs Sepsis

SIRS is vitals plus WBC ≠ Sepsis needs infection source too

Working DRG vs Final DRG

Working is CDI's estimate ≠ Final is coder's closed-record DRG

Query Count vs Query Pattern

Multiple queries aren't automatically wrong ≠ Repeated pressure toward one answer is

CMI Change vs CDI Credit

CMI can shift from case mix ≠ Check CC/MCC capture, then credit

Unable to Determine vs Uncertain

UTD means data are insufficient ≠ Differs from possible or probable

Last Minute

  1. 1.140 items: 120 scored, 20 pretest
  2. 2.3-hour exam; pass 88 of 120
  3. 3.90-day wait after any failed attempt
  4. 4.Recert every 2 years, 30 CEUs
  5. 5.Y or W pays CC/MCC
  6. 6.N or U blocks CC/MCC
  7. 7.Never yes/no for new diagnosis
  8. 8.Compliant query cites indicators, not conclusions
  9. 9.Principal diagnosis set after study
  10. 10.PSI 90 = PSIs 03, 06, 08-15
  11. 11.Sepsis-3 needs rising SOFA score
  12. 12.Record mining needs a current trigger
  13. 13.Unsupported upcoding draws OIG audits
  14. 14.Multiple queries: pattern matters, not count
Same family resources

Explore More ACDIS Clinical Documentation Integrity

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.