Career upgrade: Learn practical AI skills for better jobs and higher pay.
Level up
All Practice Exams

100+ Free ABPP School Psychology Practice Questions

Pass your ABPP School Psychology Specialty Examination exam on the first try — instant access, no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
Strong first-attempt pass rate among well-prepared candidates Pass Rate
100+ Questions
100% Free
1 / 100
Question 1
Score: 0/0

Which is the most appropriate intervention for a student with social anxiety affecting school engagement?

A
B
C
D
to track
2026 Statistics

Key Facts: ABPP School Psychology Exam

100

FREE Knowledge-Prep MCQs

OpenExamPrep ABPP School Psychology knowledge-base questions for oral-exam preparation

~3 hr

Oral Examination Length

ABSP half-day oral examination

~25%

Comprehensive Services Weight

Largest content domain across knowledge-prep distribution

~$875

2026 Total Fees Est.

Application + practice-sample review + oral examination per ABPP fee schedule

10 yr

MOC Cycle

ABPP Maintenance of Certification

Oral exam

Primary Delivery

Competency-based oral examination preceded by practice samples

ABPP School Psychology is a competency-based oral examination preceded by credentials and practice-sample review. The 2026 process emphasizes comprehensive school psych services (~25%), evidence-based interventions for school-aged (~20%), special education law including IDEA/Section 504 (~20%), multicultural/equity (~15%), prevention/crisis response (~10%), and ethics (~10%). Candidates must hold a doctoral psychology degree, current licensure, and postdoctoral specialty experience in school psychology — post-licensure advanced credential.

Sample ABPP School Psychology Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your ABPP School Psychology exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Which framework most comprehensively describes the scope of school psychology practice per NASP?
A.Diagnostic testing only
B.NASP Practice Model — comprehensive integrated services including assessment, intervention, consultation, prevention, crisis response, and systems-level practice
C.Counseling alone
D.Clerical record-keeping
Explanation: NASP Practice Model (2020) organizes 10 domains of comprehensive integrated services including data-based decision making, consultation and collaboration, academic interventions, social-emotional interventions, school-wide practices, family-school collaboration, equity, research and EBP, and legal/ethical/professional practice.
2Response to Intervention (RtI) / Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) typically consists of:
A.Single tier of universal instruction
B.Three tiers — Tier 1 universal, Tier 2 targeted small-group, Tier 3 intensive individualized — with progress monitoring and data-based decisions
C.Only special education
D.Only gifted services
Explanation: RtI/MTSS has three tiers: Tier 1 universal core instruction for all (~80%), Tier 2 targeted small-group intervention (~15%), Tier 3 intensive individualized (~5%). Progress monitoring and data-based decision-making drive movement between tiers and special education eligibility considerations.
3Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is best described as:
A.Punishment-focused discipline system
B.School-wide multi-tiered behavioral framework emphasizing prevention, teaching of expected behaviors, positive reinforcement, and data-based decision-making
C.Special-education-only intervention
D.Single-classroom intervention
Explanation: PBIS is a school-wide, multi-tiered behavioral framework (Sugai & Horner) emphasizing prevention, explicit teaching of behavioral expectations, positive reinforcement, consistent consequences for problem behavior, and data-based decision-making. ESSA-aligned and evidence-based.
4Under IDEA 2004, an Individualized Education Program (IEP) must include:
A.Present levels, measurable annual goals, special education and related services, accommodations, participation in general education, assessment participation, transition services, and progress reporting
B.Only diagnostic testing scores
C.Only the student's grade level
D.Only the parent's contact information
Explanation: IDEA 2004 IEP requirements: present levels of academic achievement and functional performance, measurable annual goals, special education and related services, accommodations, justification for participation in general education, statewide assessment participation, transition services starting by age 16, and progress reporting.
5Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) under IDEA 2004 means:
A.Best possible education at any cost
B.Special education and related services designed to meet unique needs and provide educational benefit, at public expense, under public supervision and direction, conforming to IEP
C.Private school placement only
D.Education only for gifted students
Explanation: FAPE under IDEA means special education and related services that (1) are at public expense, (2) meet state standards, (3) provide an appropriate elementary/secondary education, and (4) conform to the IEP. Endrew F. v. Douglas County (2017) clarified FAPE requires an IEP reasonably calculated to enable progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances.
6Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) under IDEA mandates:
A.Special placement is preferred
B.To the maximum extent appropriate, students with disabilities are educated with non-disabled peers, with removal only when nature/severity of disability requires it
C.Always segregated placement
D.Only homeschool
Explanation: IDEA LRE: students with disabilities are educated with non-disabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. Removal to special classes/separate schools occurs only when education in general classes with supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.
7Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 differs from IDEA in that 504:
A.Has higher disability eligibility threshold
B.Is broader civil rights law; eligibility based on substantial limitation of major life activity; no requirement for educational benefit needs analysis; provides accommodations and modifications
C.Provides only special education services
D.Doesn't apply to schools
Explanation: Section 504 is broader civil rights law applying to federally funded entities. Eligibility — physical or mental impairment substantially limiting one or more major life activities. Provides 504 Plan with accommodations and modifications. IDEA is education-specific with categorical eligibility plus need for special education.
8Which is a comprehensive cognitive assessment instrument typically used in school-based psychoeducational evaluations?
A.WISC-V, DAS-II, KABC-II, WJ-IV Cognitive — each grounded in CHC theory and used in special education eligibility decisions
B.MMPI-3
C.Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scales
D.GAD-7
Explanation: School psychologists commonly use WISC-V, WPPSI-IV, DAS-II, KABC-II, WJ-IV Cognitive, Stanford-Binet 5, RIAS-2 — all grounded in CHC (Cattell-Horn-Carroll) theory. Selection considers cultural-linguistic appropriateness and SLD identification needs.
9Which is a comprehensive academic achievement battery used in SLD evaluations?
A.WJ-IV Achievement, WIAT-4, KTEA-3
B.BDI-II
C.ADOS-2
D.Bayley-4
Explanation: School-based academic achievement batteries: Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement, Wechsler Individual Achievement Test 4 (WIAT-4), Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement 3 (KTEA-3). All assess reading (decoding, fluency, comprehension), writing, math, oral language.
10The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing-2 (CTOPP-2) assesses:
A.Phonological awareness, phonological memory, and rapid naming — critical for dyslexia identification
B.Pure motor function
C.Eating behavior
D.Sleep stages
Explanation: CTOPP-2 assesses phonological awareness (elision, blending), phonological memory (digit span, nonword repetition), and rapid naming (RAN) — three core processes related to reading. Deficits predict reading difficulties (dyslexia) and inform intervention.

About the ABPP School Psychology Exam

The ABPP School Psychology Specialty Examination is administered by the American Board of School Psychology under ABPP. The certification process is competency-based — not a stand-alone MCQ exam. It includes (1) credentials review (doctoral degree from APA/CPA-accredited program in school or related psychology with equivalent doctoral preparation, current licensure, postdoctoral specialty experience in school psychology), (2) practice-sample review (de-identified case material demonstrating assessment, intervention, consultation, prevention, and ethics competencies in PreK-12 educational settings), and (3) a half-day oral examination assessing foundational competencies (ethics, individual/cultural diversity, professionalism, EBPP, reflective practice, interdisciplinary systems) and functional competencies (assessment, intervention, consultation, prevention, crisis response, supervision, research, management, advocacy, systems-level practice). Content spans NASP Practice Model (10 domains), evidence-based academic and behavioral/SEL interventions within RtI/MTSS and PBIS frameworks, IDEA 2004/Section 504 special education law, multicultural and equity considerations (disproportionality, EL assessment, LGBTQ+ affirmative care, Plyler v. Doe), prevention and crisis response (PREPaRE, CSTAG threat assessment, suicide prevention/postvention), and ethics (NASP Principles 2020, APA Ethics Code 2017, FERPA, mandated reporting, dual relationships in schools). The 100 practice questions prepare the knowledge base examined throughout the oral exam and practice-sample discussion.

Questions

100 scored questions

Time Limit

Half-day oral examination (~3 hours) after credentials and practice-sample review

Passing Score

Competency-based pass standard set by ABSP examiners

Exam Fee

~$875 total (application + practice-sample review + oral examination) (American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP) / American Board of School Psychology (ABSP))

ABPP School Psychology Exam Content Outline

~25%

Comprehensive School Psychology Services

NASP Practice Model (2020) — 10 domains: data-based decision making; consultation and collaboration; academic interventions; mental and behavioral health interventions; school-wide practices to promote learning; preventive and responsive services; family-school collaboration; equity, diversity, and inclusion; research and evidence-based practice; legal, ethical, and professional practice. Cognitive assessment — WISC-V (6-16), WPPSI-IV (2:6-7:7), WAIS-V (16+), DAS-II, KABC-II, WJ-IV Cognitive, Stanford-Binet 5, RIAS-2, NNAT-3 — grounded in CHC theory. Academic achievement — WJ-IV, WIAT-4, KTEA-3. CTOPP-2 (phonological awareness, phonological memory, rapid naming). Behavior rating — BASC-3, ASEBA CBCL/TRF/YSR, Conners-3. Adaptive — Vineland-3 (Communication, Daily Living, Socialization, Motor), ABAS-3. Universal mental health screening — SAEBRS, BIMAS-2, BESS-3. Depression — PHQ-A, CDI-2, MFQ. Consultation — Bergan & Kratochwill behavioral (problem identification, analysis, plan implementation, plan evaluation), Caplan mental-health consultation, Rosenfield instructional consultation, Sheridan & Kratochwill conjoint behavioral. Family-school partnership (Christenson; Sheridan). Twice-exceptional (gifted + disability). Gifted identification (NAGC). Early childhood (Bayley-4, BDI-3, DAYC-2, DP-3; IDEA Part C birth-3 and Section 619 ages 3-5). Supervision per APA/NASP guidelines.

~20%

Evidence-Based Interventions for School-Aged

RtI/MTSS three tiers — Tier 1 universal core instruction (~80% successful), Tier 2 targeted small-group (~15%), Tier 3 intensive individualized (~5%) — with brief repeated CBM probes and data-based decision rules (e.g., 4 data points below aim line). PBIS (Sugai & Horner) — school-wide multi-tiered positive behavioral framework. Check-In/Check-Out (CICO; Crone, Hawken, Horner) Tier 2 intervention with Daily Progress Report. FBA — ABC analysis identifying function (escape, attention, tangible, sensory) → function-based BIP. Curriculum-Based Measurement (Deno). CASEL Social-Emotional Learning five competencies — self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, responsible decision-making. Reading intervention — National Reading Panel/IDA — systematic explicit phonics with phonological awareness, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension (Orton-Gillingham, Wilson, Lindamood-Bell, science of reading). Reciprocal teaching (Palincsar & Brown). Math intervention — explicit instruction with worked examples, CRA (concrete-representational-abstract), fluency. Writing — Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD; Graham & Harris). Universal Design for Learning (UDL; CAST) — multiple means of engagement, representation, action/expression. Restorative practices (Zehr; Pranis). School-based trauma — CBITS (Stein), Bounce Back. Group CBT for anxiety — SASS (Masia Warner) for social anxiety, FRIENDS for Life (Barrett), Coping Cat group. School-based mindfulness — MindUP, Learning to BREATHE, Inner Explorer. Executive function instruction (Meltzer; Dawson & Guare). Pre-referral intervention. Self-efficacy (Bandura, Schunk). DIBELS, AIMSweb Plus, easyCBM, FastBridge early literacy screening.

~20%

Special Education Law

IDEA 2004 — IEP required components (present levels of academic achievement and functional performance, measurable annual goals, special education and related services, accommodations, justification for general education participation, statewide assessment participation, transition services by age 16, progress reporting). FAPE per Endrew F. v. Douglas County (2017) — IEP reasonably calculated to enable progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances. LRE — to the maximum extent appropriate, students with disabilities educated with non-disabled peers. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (1973) — broader civil rights law; substantial limitation of major life activity; 504 Plan with accommodations. SLD identification options — severe discrepancy, RtI, or pattern of strengths and weaknesses (PSW; Flanagan, Hale, Naglieri). 60-day federal evaluation timeline (state may set shorter). Reevaluation every 3 years. Manifestation Determination Review (MDR) — required for disciplinary removal beyond 10 cumulative days; if behavior is manifestation of disability, FBA/BIP follows. Transition services by age 16 — measurable postsecondary goals, transition activities, coordinated agency referrals. Alternate assessments (AA-AAAS) reserved for <1% with significant cognitive disabilities (Dynamic Learning Maps). Plyler v. Doe (1982) — undocumented children's constitutional right to public K-12 education. Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense when parents disagree with school's evaluation. Procedural safeguards including prior written notice, mediation, and due process hearing. Eligibility for ID requires cognitive + adaptive deficits + developmental-period onset. ED criteria — at least one of five characteristics (inability to learn unexplained by other factors, relationship difficulties, inappropriate behaviors/feelings, pervasive unhappiness/depression, physical symptoms/fears) over time and to marked degree with adverse educational impact. Per 34 CFR 300.304, no single measure determines eligibility.

~15%

Multicultural & Equity Considerations

NASP and APA Multicultural Guidelines. Culturally and linguistically appropriate measures, qualified bilingual evaluators (per IDEA), integration of cultural framework into interpretation. Disproportionality in special education identification (particularly ID, EBD), placement (more restrictive settings), and discipline (Black, Latinx, Native American students disproportionately affected) — IDEA 2004 and ESSA require monitoring/intervention. English Learner (EL) assessment — assess language proficiency (WIDA ACCESS, WMLS-III), distinguish language difference from disability, use native-language assessment when feasible, use nonverbal cognitive measures with newcomer/limited-prior-schooling ELs (UNIT-2, Leiter-3, KABC-II nonverbal index, NNAT-3). Bilingual school psychologists or qualified interpreters trained for testing. Plyler v. Doe — undocumented students have constitutional right to public education; protect immigration status privacy. Twice-exceptional (2e) — identify both giftedness and disability without masking. Culturally informed gifted identification with ELs — nonverbal measures, portfolios, performance assessments to reduce underidentification. LGBTQ+ affirmative care per NASP/APA — chosen name/pronouns, anti-bullying protection, family acceptance (Ryan et al.), facilities consistent with gender identity per applicable policy, affirming counseling, prohibition of conversion practices. Cultural humility (Tervalon & Murray-García). Intersectionality (Crenshaw). Systemic equity work — disaggregated data analysis, implicit bias training, culturally responsive PBIS (CR-PBIS), restorative practices, family/community engagement. ESSA accommodations for ELs.

~10%

Prevention & Crisis Response

NASP PREPaRE Crisis Prevention and Intervention Model — Prevent and PREpare, Reaffirm physical health/safety, Evaluate trauma risk, Provide interventions/Respond, Examine effectiveness. Established crisis team with defined roles (commander, mental health lead, communications), pre-developed plan, ICS-aligned. Suicide prevention — universal mental health literacy, gatekeeper training (QPR, Signs of Suicide), validated screening (C-SSRS, ASQ), means restriction counseling, safety planning (Stanley-Brown), crisis response, postvention (After a Suicide toolkit, safe messaging per Reporting on Suicide guidelines — avoid method/location details, romanticization). Threat assessment — Virginia Comprehensive School Threat Assessment Guidelines (CSTAG; Cornell) distinguishing transient (no intent) vs substantive (intent + capability); Salem-Keizer Threat Assessment System. Olweus Bullying Prevention Program — multi-tiered. SBIRT for substance use with CRAFFT 2.1+N (Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Family-Friends, Trouble, Nicotine — 2+ positive). Trauma-informed schools (SAMHSA framework). Mental health stigma reduction (Mental Health First Aid for Youth, Teen MHFA). Chronic absenteeism — Attendance Works framework (10%+ school days). School refusal — Kearney functional assessment (anxiety, escape, attention, tangible). Acute crisis response — ASQ/C-SSRS, de-escalation, supervision, family notification, safety plan, emergency services if needed.

~10%

Ethics

NASP Principles for Professional Ethics 2020 — four broad principles: I. Respecting the Dignity and Rights of All Persons; II. Professional Competence and Responsibility; III. Honesty and Integrity in Professional Relationships; IV. Responsibility to Schools, Families, Communities, the Profession, and Society. APA Ethics Code (2017) — Standard 2.01 Boundaries of Competence; 3.05 Multiple Relationships; 3.10 Informed Consent; 4.02 Confidentiality Limits; 4.05 Disclosures; 9.02 Use of Assessments. FERPA (1974) — educational records at federally funded schools; parental access rights until student turns 18 or attends postsecondary; sole-possession notes exempt if not shared. HIPAA vs FERPA boundaries — generally FERPA covers school records, HIPAA covers healthcare records (with exceptions). Mandated reporting to CPS — prompt (typically same day), individual responsibility (cannot delegate to principal), reason-to-suspect standard. Dual relationships — Standard 3.05; manage in small communities with disclosure, role-clarity, supervision, documentation. Confidentiality with minors — discuss limits up front with student and parents; safety exceptions; mandated reporting; certain threats. Predetermination of eligibility outcomes prohibited. Response to confidentiality breach by colleague — address directly, report per district policy, document, advocate. Documentation per APA Record Keeping Guidelines. Technology — FERPA, HIPAA, COPPA (Children's Online Privacy Protection Act for under-13). Plyler v. Doe protection of immigration status. Cultural humility. Independent Educational Evaluation rights.

How to Pass the ABPP School Psychology Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: Competency-based pass standard set by ABSP examiners
  • Exam length: 100 questions
  • Time limit: Half-day oral examination (~3 hours) after credentials and practice-sample review
  • Exam fee: ~$875 total (application + practice-sample review + oral examination)

Keys to Passing

  • Complete 500+ practice questions
  • Score 80%+ consistently before scheduling
  • Focus on highest-weighted sections
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

ABPP School Psychology Study Tips from Top Performers

1ABPP uses CREDENTIALS + PRACTICE SAMPLES + ORAL EXAM — these MCQs prep the knowledge base. The bulk of preparation is the practice-sample portfolio and oral case formulation. Use this bank to identify weak content areas, then read primary sources (NASP Best Practices in School Psychology; NASP Practice Model documents; IDEA 2004 and Section 504 regulations; Endrew F. v. Douglas County; APA Ethics Code 2017; NASP Principles for Professional Ethics 2020).
2Master the NASP Practice Model (2020) 10 domains. Be ready to articulate how each domain shows up in your practice samples — data-based decision making, consultation, academic interventions, mental/behavioral health interventions, school-wide practices, preventive services, family-school collaboration, equity/diversity/inclusion, research/EBP, legal/ethical/professional practice.
3Know IDEA 2004 and Section 504 cold. IEP components, FAPE per Endrew F. (reasonably calculated for progress appropriate to the child's circumstances), LRE (max extent appropriate with non-disabled peers), SLD identification options (severe discrepancy, RtI, or PSW), Manifestation Determination Review (>10 cumulative days), 60-day federal evaluation timeline, transition services by age 16, alternate assessments <1%. Section 504 — substantial limitation of major life activity. Plyler v. Doe — undocumented children's constitutional right to public education.
4Internalize RtI/MTSS, PBIS, and crisis-response frameworks. Three-tier RtI with CBM progress monitoring and decision rules. PBIS school-wide multi-tier behavioral framework. CICO Tier 2. FBA → function-based BIP. CASEL 5 SEL competencies. PREPaRE crisis model (P-R-E-P-aR-E). Virginia CSTAG threat assessment (transient vs substantive). Postvention with safe messaging.
5Prepare ethics scenarios cold. NASP Principles 2020 four broad principles. APA Ethics Code (2017) — Standard 2.01 competence, 3.05 multiple relationships, 4.02 confidentiality limits, 9.02 use of assessments. FERPA (educational records, parental access until 18) vs HIPAA. Mandated reporting (prompt, individual, reason-to-suspect). Confidentiality with minors (limits up front). Predetermination prohibition. Documentation per APA Record Keeping. COPPA for technology under 13. Independent Educational Evaluation rights.
6Be ready to discuss equity and multicultural practice at depth. Disproportionality (Black, Latinx, Native American students), EL assessment (language proficiency, nonverbal measures with newcomers, qualified bilingual evaluators), twice-exceptional identification, LGBTQ+ affirmative care (chosen name/pronouns, no conversion practices), cultural humility (Tervalon & Murray-García), intersectionality (Crenshaw), Plyler v. Doe protection of immigration status, ESSA accommodations for ELs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ABPP School Psychology Specialty Examination?

The ABPP School Psychology Specialty Examination is administered by the American Board of School Psychology under the American Board of Professional Psychology. It is a post-licensure competency-based credential — distinct from initial state licensure or NASP NCSP certification — not a stand-alone MCQ exam. The process includes credentials review (doctoral training in school or related psychology with equivalent doctoral preparation, current licensure, postdoctoral specialty experience), practice-sample review (de-identified case material), and a half-day oral examination assessing foundational competencies (ethics, diversity, EBPP) and functional competencies (assessment, intervention, consultation, prevention, crisis, supervision, research, advocacy, systems-level practice) in PreK-12 settings.

Do these 100 MCQs replace the ABPP oral exam?

No. ABPP School Psychology uses CREDENTIALS REVIEW + PRACTICE SAMPLES + ORAL EXAM — these MCQs prep the knowledge base. The bulk of preparation is your portfolio of practice samples (demonstrating competencies in assessment, intervention, consultation, ethics, equity) and oral case formulation. Use this 100-question bank to deepen and verify knowledge across the six content areas.

Who is eligible for ABPP School Psychology certification?

Candidates must hold a doctoral degree (PhD, PsyD, EdD) in school or related psychology from an APA- or CPA-accredited program (or NASP-approved program with equivalent doctoral preparation), current independent licensure as a psychologist, and postdoctoral specialty experience in school psychology. ABPP SP is an ADVANCED post-licensure credential. Verify current eligibility on the ABPP School Psychology specialty board page.

What does the oral examination cover?

The half-day oral examination assesses foundational competencies (ethics and legal standards, individual and cultural diversity, professional values, reflective practice, EBPP, interdisciplinary systems) and functional competencies (assessment, intervention, consultation, prevention, crisis response, supervision, research, management, advocacy, systems-level practice) applied to PreK-12 settings. Examiners use submitted practice samples and present additional vignettes covering NASP Practice Model 10 domains, RtI/MTSS/PBIS, IDEA 2004/Section 504 law, multicultural/equity, crisis response (PREPaRE, CSTAG), and ethics (NASP, APA, FERPA).

How much does ABPP School Psychology certification cost?

Application, practice-sample review, and oral examination fees total approximately $875 in current ABPP fee schedules (verify on abpp.org). MOC is required every 10 years. Practice-sample resubmission or oral re-examination, if needed, incurs additional fees per ABPP policy.

How is the exam scored?

ABPP School Psychology uses a competency-based pass standard, not a numeric cut score. Examiners evaluate responses, integration of evidence, ethical reasoning, and case formulation against ABSP rubrics. Outcomes are pass or non-pass; if non-pass, examiners typically provide developmental feedback identifying competency areas for further preparation.

What are the highest-yield topics?

Highest-yield: NASP Practice Model 10 domains; RtI/MTSS three tiers and progress monitoring; PBIS and Check-In/Check-Out (CICO); FBA → BIP; IDEA 2004 (IEP, FAPE Endrew F., LRE, SLD identification options, Manifestation Determination, 60-day timeline, transition by 16, alternate assessments); Section 504 vs IDEA; Plyler v. Doe; Independent Educational Evaluation; evidence-based reading (Orton-Gillingham, science of reading) and math (CRA, explicit) and writing (SRSD); CASEL SEL; Universal Design for Learning; CBITS for school trauma; SASS/FRIENDS group CBT for anxiety; PREPaRE crisis model; CSTAG threat assessment; suicide prevention/postvention with safe messaging; CRAFFT for substance use; disproportionality and equity; EL assessment with nonverbal measures; LGBTQ+ affirmative care; NASP Principles 2020 four broad principles; APA Ethics Standards 2.01/3.05/4.02; FERPA vs HIPAA; mandated reporting; predetermination prohibition; COPPA for technology.

How should I prepare?

Use a 12-18 month plan: (1) develop credentials and practice samples demonstrating competencies across assessment, intervention, consultation, prevention/crisis, ethics, and equity; (2) build knowledge across the six content areas via NASP Best Practices in School Psychology (Thomas & Grimes), NASP Practice Model documents, IDEA and Section 504 regulations, Endrew F. and Plyler decisions, ACRM/CASEL/IES Practice Guides, NASP PREPaRE and CSTAG resources, APA Ethics Code (2017), and NASP Principles for Professional Ethics 2020; (3) drill MCQs from this bank; (4) complete several mock oral exams with experienced ABPP-SP colleagues; (5) finalize practice samples (allow 2-3 months for editing and review); (6) refine case-formulation language for the oral exam, emphasizing systems-level practice and equity-informed approaches.