PracticeVideosBlogFlashcards

Question

On 31 December 2025, a chemical manufacturing company operating in an industrial zone in Yangon faces an environmental claim. Legal counsel advises that there is a 75% probability that the company will be found liable and required to pay 40,000,000 MMK in remediation costs within one year. There is a 25% chance of successful defense with zero payment. The risk-adjusted discount rate is negligible. Under IAS 37 (Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets), how should the company treat this matter?

Financial Accounting Reporting

Question · Medium

Question

An entity acquires an investment property in Yangon on 1 January 2024 for 100,000,000 MMK and adopts the fair value model under IAS 40 / MFRS 40. At 31 December 2024, an independent professional valuation determines the property's fair value to be 115,000,000 MMK. At 31 December 2025, due to local commercial property fluctuations, the fair value is determined to be 108,000,000 MMK. How should the change in fair value for the year ended 31 December 2025 be recognized?

Financial Accounting Reporting

Question · Medium

Question

An auditor sets planning materiality at 50,000,000 MMK and performance materiality at 37,500,000 MMK (75% of planning materiality). During testing of trade payables, the auditor discovers an unrecorded liability of 10,000,000 MMK. The auditor also projects sampling misstatements of 15,000,000 MMK across other operational expenses. What does performance materiality represent under ISA 320?

Practical Auditing

Question · Hard

Question

An auditor evaluating an enterprise under ISA 570 (Going Concern) identifies significant financial distress, including consecutive operating losses, loan covenant breaches, and reliance on short-term borrowings. Management has formulated a realistic restructuring plan and adequately disclosed the material uncertainty in Note 24 of the financial statements. How should the auditor report on going concern?

Practical Auditing

Question · Medium

Question

A manufacturing company in Bago begins operations in 2025. It produces 10,000 units and sells 8,000 units at 5,000 MMK per unit. Variable manufacturing cost is 2,000 MMK per unit. Fixed manufacturing overhead for the year is 15,000,000 MMK (budgeted and actual). Fixed selling and administrative expenses total 6,000,000 MMK. There is no opening inventory. What is the difference between operating profit calculated under absorption costing and operating profit calculated under marginal (variable) costing?

Performance Management

Question · Hard

Question

A company in Mawlamyine is deciding whether to accept a special one-off order for 1,000 units of custom packaging. The customer offers a price of 4,500 MMK per unit. The normal cost card shows: Direct materials 2,000 MMK, Direct labor 1,500 MMK, Variable overhead 500 MMK, Fixed overhead absorbed 1,200 MMK (Total cost = 5,200 MMK). The company currently has spare factory capacity, and fixed overheads will not increase if the order is accepted. Direct labor is currently underutilized and workers are paid a guaranteed weekly wage with available idle time to complete the order at no additional cost. Direct materials must be purchased specifically for the order. What is the minimum relevant cost per unit to accept the special order?

Performance Management

Question · Hard

Question

A textile enterprise in Myanmar faces a shortage of skilled machine hours. It manufactures two products, Product X and Product Y. Data is as follows: - Product X: Selling price = 15,000 MMK; Variable cost = 9,000 MMK; Machine hours required = 2 hours - Product Y: Selling price = 22,000 MMK; Variable cost = 12,000 MMK; Machine hours required = 4 hours If machine hours are the sole binding limiting factor, which product should be prioritized in the production schedule?

Performance Management

Question · Medium

Loading more…