4.4 Radiographic Testing (RT) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

Key Takeaways

  • RT uses X-rays or gamma rays to image internal discontinuities — excellent for volumetric (porosity, slag)
  • UT uses high-frequency sound waves — excellent for planar (cracks, lack of fusion)
  • RT provides a permanent record; UT provides depth information and needs only one-side access
  • RT has radiation hazards; UT has no radiation hazard
  • Both require ASNT-certified personnel (Level II or III) for interpretation
  • PAUT and TOFD are advanced UT techniques providing electronic records and accurate sizing
Last updated: March 2026

4.4 Radiographic Testing (RT) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

RT and UT are volumetric NDE methods — they can detect discontinuities inside the weld (subsurface) as well as on the surface. They complement each other: RT excels at detecting volumetric discontinuities (porosity, slag), while UT excels at detecting planar discontinuities (cracks, lack of fusion).

Radiographic Testing (RT)

RT uses X-rays (from an X-ray tube) or gamma rays (from a radioactive isotope such as Ir-192 or Co-60) to create an image of the internal structure of a weld on film or a digital detector.

How RT Works:

  1. Radiation passes through the weld
  2. Discontinuities absorb or transmit radiation differently than sound metal
  3. A film or digital detector on the opposite side records the image
  4. Discontinuities appear as darker areas on film (more radiation passed through the thinner/less dense discontinuity)

RT Terminology:

TermDefinition
SourceX-ray tube or radioactive isotope
FilmLight-sensitive medium that records the image
IQI (Image Quality Indicator)Standardized device placed on the weld to verify radiographic quality (also called penetrameter)
DensityDarkness of the film (measured with a densitometer)
SensitivityAbility to detect small discontinuities (determined by IQI visibility)
Geometric unsharpnessBlurring due to source size, source-to-film distance, and object-to-film distance

RT Advantages:

  • Permanent record (film or digital image) for future review
  • Excellent for volumetric discontinuities (porosity, slag)
  • Detects internal discontinuities through full thickness
  • Widely accepted by codes for groove weld inspection

RT Limitations:

  • Radiation hazard — requires safety protocols, restricted areas, trained personnel
  • Poor at detecting planar discontinuities oriented parallel to the beam (cracks parallel to beam may be missed)
  • Not effective on thick materials (limited by source energy and exposure time)
  • Requires access to both sides of the weld
  • Interpretation requires trained, certified personnel (ASNT Level II or III)

Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

UT uses high-frequency sound waves (typically 1–6 MHz) to detect internal and surface discontinuities. A transducer sends sound pulses into the material; discontinuities reflect the sound back to the transducer, producing an echo on the display.

How UT Works:

  1. A transducer generates sound waves and sends them into the material through a couplant (gel or liquid)
  2. Sound travels through the material until it hits a reflector (discontinuity or back wall)
  3. The reflected sound returns to the transducer and appears as a signal on the display
  4. The time of the signal indicates the depth; the amplitude indicates the size of the reflector

UT Techniques for Welds:

TechniqueDescriptionApplication
Straight beam (0°)Sound enters perpendicular to surfaceMeasuring thickness, lamination detection
Angle beamSound enters at an angle (45°, 60°, 70°)Weld inspection — beam refracts into weld from the side
Phased array (PAUT)Multiple elements steered electronicallyAdvanced scanning — sector, linear, or compound scans
TOFD (Time of Flight Diffraction)Measures diffracted signals from crack tipsAccurate sizing of planar discontinuities

UT Advantages:

  • Excellent for detecting planar discontinuities (cracks, lack of fusion)
  • Immediate results — no processing time
  • Can determine depth and size of discontinuities
  • Requires access to only one side of the weld
  • Portable and fast
  • No radiation hazard

UT Limitations:

  • No permanent record (unless PAUT or TOFD with electronic data storage)
  • Requires skilled, trained operators (ASNT Level II or III)
  • Less effective on thin materials (< 1/4")
  • Surface must be reasonably smooth (couplant contact)
  • Difficult on complex geometries
  • Less effective for volumetric discontinuities (scattered porosity) than RT

RT vs. UT Comparison

FeatureRTUT
Best forVolumetric (porosity, slag)Planar (cracks, LOF)
RecordPermanent (film/digital)No inherent record (PAUT provides electronic record)
AccessBoth sides requiredOne side only
SafetyRadiation hazardNo radiation
Thickness rangeLimited by source energyWide range (1/4" to several feet)
Depth informationNo (2D projection)Yes (time = depth)
Skill requiredHighVery high
SpeedSlow (exposure + processing)Fast (real-time)

For the Exam: Know that RT is best for volumetric discontinuities and UT is best for planar discontinuities. RT provides a permanent record but has radiation hazards. UT provides depth information and needs only one-side access but traditionally lacks a permanent record (PAUT addresses this).

Test Your Knowledge

Which NDE method is BEST suited for detecting planar discontinuities like cracks and lack of fusion?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Which NDE method provides a permanent record of the inspection and is excellent for detecting volumetric discontinuities?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

A major limitation of radiographic testing compared to ultrasonic testing is:

A
B
C
D