4.4 Radiographic Testing (RT) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
Key Takeaways
- RT uses X-rays or gamma rays to image internal discontinuities — excellent for volumetric (porosity, slag)
- UT uses high-frequency sound waves — excellent for planar (cracks, lack of fusion)
- RT provides a permanent record; UT provides depth information and needs only one-side access
- RT has radiation hazards; UT has no radiation hazard
- Both require ASNT-certified personnel (Level II or III) for interpretation
- PAUT and TOFD are advanced UT techniques providing electronic records and accurate sizing
4.4 Radiographic Testing (RT) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
RT and UT are volumetric NDE methods — they can detect discontinuities inside the weld (subsurface) as well as on the surface. They complement each other: RT excels at detecting volumetric discontinuities (porosity, slag), while UT excels at detecting planar discontinuities (cracks, lack of fusion).
Radiographic Testing (RT)
RT uses X-rays (from an X-ray tube) or gamma rays (from a radioactive isotope such as Ir-192 or Co-60) to create an image of the internal structure of a weld on film or a digital detector.
How RT Works:
- Radiation passes through the weld
- Discontinuities absorb or transmit radiation differently than sound metal
- A film or digital detector on the opposite side records the image
- Discontinuities appear as darker areas on film (more radiation passed through the thinner/less dense discontinuity)
RT Terminology:
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Source | X-ray tube or radioactive isotope |
| Film | Light-sensitive medium that records the image |
| IQI (Image Quality Indicator) | Standardized device placed on the weld to verify radiographic quality (also called penetrameter) |
| Density | Darkness of the film (measured with a densitometer) |
| Sensitivity | Ability to detect small discontinuities (determined by IQI visibility) |
| Geometric unsharpness | Blurring due to source size, source-to-film distance, and object-to-film distance |
RT Advantages:
- Permanent record (film or digital image) for future review
- Excellent for volumetric discontinuities (porosity, slag)
- Detects internal discontinuities through full thickness
- Widely accepted by codes for groove weld inspection
RT Limitations:
- Radiation hazard — requires safety protocols, restricted areas, trained personnel
- Poor at detecting planar discontinuities oriented parallel to the beam (cracks parallel to beam may be missed)
- Not effective on thick materials (limited by source energy and exposure time)
- Requires access to both sides of the weld
- Interpretation requires trained, certified personnel (ASNT Level II or III)
Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
UT uses high-frequency sound waves (typically 1–6 MHz) to detect internal and surface discontinuities. A transducer sends sound pulses into the material; discontinuities reflect the sound back to the transducer, producing an echo on the display.
How UT Works:
- A transducer generates sound waves and sends them into the material through a couplant (gel or liquid)
- Sound travels through the material until it hits a reflector (discontinuity or back wall)
- The reflected sound returns to the transducer and appears as a signal on the display
- The time of the signal indicates the depth; the amplitude indicates the size of the reflector
UT Techniques for Welds:
| Technique | Description | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Straight beam (0°) | Sound enters perpendicular to surface | Measuring thickness, lamination detection |
| Angle beam | Sound enters at an angle (45°, 60°, 70°) | Weld inspection — beam refracts into weld from the side |
| Phased array (PAUT) | Multiple elements steered electronically | Advanced scanning — sector, linear, or compound scans |
| TOFD (Time of Flight Diffraction) | Measures diffracted signals from crack tips | Accurate sizing of planar discontinuities |
UT Advantages:
- Excellent for detecting planar discontinuities (cracks, lack of fusion)
- Immediate results — no processing time
- Can determine depth and size of discontinuities
- Requires access to only one side of the weld
- Portable and fast
- No radiation hazard
UT Limitations:
- No permanent record (unless PAUT or TOFD with electronic data storage)
- Requires skilled, trained operators (ASNT Level II or III)
- Less effective on thin materials (< 1/4")
- Surface must be reasonably smooth (couplant contact)
- Difficult on complex geometries
- Less effective for volumetric discontinuities (scattered porosity) than RT
RT vs. UT Comparison
| Feature | RT | UT |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Volumetric (porosity, slag) | Planar (cracks, LOF) |
| Record | Permanent (film/digital) | No inherent record (PAUT provides electronic record) |
| Access | Both sides required | One side only |
| Safety | Radiation hazard | No radiation |
| Thickness range | Limited by source energy | Wide range (1/4" to several feet) |
| Depth information | No (2D projection) | Yes (time = depth) |
| Skill required | High | Very high |
| Speed | Slow (exposure + processing) | Fast (real-time) |
For the Exam: Know that RT is best for volumetric discontinuities and UT is best for planar discontinuities. RT provides a permanent record but has radiation hazards. UT provides depth information and needs only one-side access but traditionally lacks a permanent record (PAUT addresses this).
Which NDE method is BEST suited for detecting planar discontinuities like cracks and lack of fusion?
Which NDE method provides a permanent record of the inspection and is excellent for detecting volumetric discontinuities?
A major limitation of radiographic testing compared to ultrasonic testing is: